Sex Differences in Long-Term Mortality of Patients with Hypertensive Crisis Visiting the Emergency Department.

Journal of women's health (2002) Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2021.0430
Byung Sik Kim, Hyun-Jin Kim, Jeong-Hun Shin, Jun Hyeok Lee, Woohyeun Kim, Jin-Kyu Park, Jinho Shin
{"title":"Sex Differences in Long-Term Mortality of Patients with Hypertensive Crisis Visiting the Emergency Department.","authors":"Byung Sik Kim,&nbsp;Hyun-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Jeong-Hun Shin,&nbsp;Jun Hyeok Lee,&nbsp;Woohyeun Kim,&nbsp;Jin-Kyu Park,&nbsp;Jinho Shin","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2021.0430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> There are limited data on sex difference in patients with hypertensive crisis. We investigated sex differences in characteristics and long-term mortality in patients with hypertensive crisis visiting the emergency department (ED). <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study at a tertiary referral center included patients ≥18 years of age who were admitted to the ED between 2016 and 2019 with hypertensive crisis, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 6,467 patients who visited the ED with hypertensive crisis, 3,131(48.4%) were women. Women were older and less likely to have acute hypertension-mediated organ damage than men. The 3-year all-cause mortality did not differ between women and men (16.9% in women and 17.2% in men, <i>p</i> = 0.738). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, the 3-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in men than in women (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.29; <i>p</i> = 0.031). In particular, among patients ≥50 years of age, the 3-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in men than in women (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29; <i>p</i> = 0.038); however, it was not different according to sex among patients 18-49 years of age. Moreover, the 3-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in men than in women among patients with hypertensive urgency (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.34-1.90; <i>p</i> < 0.001), which was reversed in patients with hypertensive emergency (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Men ≥50 years of age with hypertensive crisis, men with hypertensive urgencies, and women with hypertensive emergencies have a high risk of all-cause mortality. Thus, it is necessary to consider sex differences when predicting subsequent prognosis and determining the appropriate treatment for patients with hypertensive crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":"1137-1144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2021.0430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on sex difference in patients with hypertensive crisis. We investigated sex differences in characteristics and long-term mortality in patients with hypertensive crisis visiting the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study at a tertiary referral center included patients ≥18 years of age who were admitted to the ED between 2016 and 2019 with hypertensive crisis, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg. Results: Among the 6,467 patients who visited the ED with hypertensive crisis, 3,131(48.4%) were women. Women were older and less likely to have acute hypertension-mediated organ damage than men. The 3-year all-cause mortality did not differ between women and men (16.9% in women and 17.2% in men, p = 0.738). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, the 3-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in men than in women (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.29; p = 0.031). In particular, among patients ≥50 years of age, the 3-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in men than in women (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29; p = 0.038); however, it was not different according to sex among patients 18-49 years of age. Moreover, the 3-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in men than in women among patients with hypertensive urgency (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.34-1.90; p < 0.001), which was reversed in patients with hypertensive emergency (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Men ≥50 years of age with hypertensive crisis, men with hypertensive urgencies, and women with hypertensive emergencies have a high risk of all-cause mortality. Thus, it is necessary to consider sex differences when predicting subsequent prognosis and determining the appropriate treatment for patients with hypertensive crisis.

急诊科高血压危重患者长期死亡率的性别差异
背景:关于高血压危象患者性别差异的资料有限。我们调查了急诊科(ED)高血压危象患者的特征和长期死亡率的性别差异。材料和方法:这项在三级转诊中心进行的横断面研究纳入了2016年至2019年期间入住ED的高血压危像患者,年龄≥18岁,定义为收缩压≥180 mmHg和/或舒张压≥110 mmHg。结果:6467例就诊急诊科的高血压危象患者中,女性3131例(48.4%)。与男性相比,女性年龄较大,发生急性高血压介导的器官损伤的可能性较小。3年全因死亡率男女无差异(女性为16.9%,男性为17.2%,p = 0.738)。在调整年龄和合并症后,男性3年全因死亡率明显高于女性(风险比[HR], 1.14;95%置信区间[CI], 1.01-1.29;p = 0.031)。特别是,在年龄≥50岁的患者中,男性3年全因死亡率显著高于女性(HR, 1.14;95% ci, 1.01-1.29;p = 0.038);而在18-49岁的患者中,无性别差异。此外,男性高血压急症患者的3年全因死亡率明显高于女性(HR, 1.59;95% ci, 1.34-1.90;结论:≥50岁的男性高血压危象患者、男性高血压急症患者和女性高血压急症患者的全因死亡率较高。因此,在预测高血压危重症患者的后续预后和确定适当的治疗方法时,有必要考虑性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信