Beyond Hours Worked and Dollars Earned: Multidimensional EQ, Retirement Trajectories and Health in Later Life.

IF 2.7 2区 经济学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Work Aging and Retirement Pub Date : 2021-06-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/workar/waab012
Sarah B Andrea, Jerzy Eisenberg-Guyot, Vanessa M Oddo, Trevor Peckham, Daniel Jacoby, Anjum Hajat
{"title":"Beyond Hours Worked and Dollars Earned: Multidimensional EQ, Retirement Trajectories and Health in Later Life.","authors":"Sarah B Andrea, Jerzy Eisenberg-Guyot, Vanessa M Oddo, Trevor Peckham, Daniel Jacoby, Anjum Hajat","doi":"10.1093/workar/waab012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The working lives of Americans have become less stable over the past several decades and older adults may be particularly vulnerable to these changes in employment quality (EQ). We aimed to develop a multidimensional indicator of EQ among older adults and identify EQ and retirement trajectories in the United States. Using longitudinal data on employment stability, material rewards, workers' rights, working-time arrangements, unionization, and interpersonal power relations from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we used principal component analysis to construct an EQ score. Then, we used sequence analysis to identify late-career EQ trajectories (age 50-70 years; <i>N</i> = 11,958 respondents), overall and by sociodemographics (race, gender, educational attainment, marital status). We subsequently examined the sociodemographic, employment, and health profiles of these trajectories. We identified 10 EQ trajectories; the most prevalent trajectories were Minimally Attached and Wealthy (13.9%) and Good EQ to Well-off Retirement (13.7%), however, 42% of respondents were classified into suboptimal trajectories. Those in suboptimal trajectories were disproportionately women, people of color, and less-educated. Individuals in the Poor EQ to Delayed and Poor Retirement and Unattached and Poor clusters self-reported the greatest prevalence of poor health and depression, while individuals in the Wealthy Business Owners and Great EQ to Well-off Retirement clusters self-reported the lowest prevalence of poor health and depression at baseline. Trajectories were substantially constrained for women of color. Although our study demonstrates EQ is inequitably distributed in later life, labor organizing and policy change may afford opportunities to improve EQ and retirement among marginalized populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46486,"journal":{"name":"Work Aging and Retirement","volume":"8 1","pages":"51-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742984/pdf/waab012.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Aging and Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The working lives of Americans have become less stable over the past several decades and older adults may be particularly vulnerable to these changes in employment quality (EQ). We aimed to develop a multidimensional indicator of EQ among older adults and identify EQ and retirement trajectories in the United States. Using longitudinal data on employment stability, material rewards, workers' rights, working-time arrangements, unionization, and interpersonal power relations from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we used principal component analysis to construct an EQ score. Then, we used sequence analysis to identify late-career EQ trajectories (age 50-70 years; N = 11,958 respondents), overall and by sociodemographics (race, gender, educational attainment, marital status). We subsequently examined the sociodemographic, employment, and health profiles of these trajectories. We identified 10 EQ trajectories; the most prevalent trajectories were Minimally Attached and Wealthy (13.9%) and Good EQ to Well-off Retirement (13.7%), however, 42% of respondents were classified into suboptimal trajectories. Those in suboptimal trajectories were disproportionately women, people of color, and less-educated. Individuals in the Poor EQ to Delayed and Poor Retirement and Unattached and Poor clusters self-reported the greatest prevalence of poor health and depression, while individuals in the Wealthy Business Owners and Great EQ to Well-off Retirement clusters self-reported the lowest prevalence of poor health and depression at baseline. Trajectories were substantially constrained for women of color. Although our study demonstrates EQ is inequitably distributed in later life, labor organizing and policy change may afford opportunities to improve EQ and retirement among marginalized populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超越工时和收入:多维情商、退休轨迹和晚年健康。
在过去的几十年里,美国人的工作生活变得越来越不稳定,而老年人可能特别容易受到就业质量(EQ)变化的影响。我们的目标是在美国老年人中开发一个多维度的就业质量指标,并确定就业质量和退休轨迹。利用《健康与退休研究》(HRS)中有关就业稳定性、物质回报、工人权利、工作时间安排、工会化和人际权力关系的纵向数据,我们使用主成分分析法构建了一个 EQ 分数。然后,我们使用序列分析来确定职业生涯后期的情商轨迹(50-70 岁;N = 11,958 名受访者),包括总体轨迹和按社会人口统计(种族、性别、教育程度、婚姻状况)划分的轨迹。我们随后研究了这些轨迹的社会人口、就业和健康状况。我们确定了 10 种情商轨迹;最普遍的轨迹是最低依恋和富裕(13.9%)以及良好情商到富裕退休(13.7%),然而,42% 的受访者被归入次优轨迹。处于次优轨迹的受访者中,女性、有色人种和受教育程度较低的人占很大比例。自我报告健康状况差和抑郁发生率最高的是 "情商差到延迟退休和贫穷 "群组以及 "无牵无挂和贫穷 "群组,而 "富裕企业主 "和 "情商高到富裕退休 "群组中的个人自我报告基线健康状况差和抑郁发生率最低。有色人种女性的轨迹受到很大限制。尽管我们的研究表明,晚年生活中的情商分布并不公平,但劳动组织和政策变革可能为改善边缘化人群的情商和退休生活提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
21.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信