Benefits and interval training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A thematic review.

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2021.2002020
David R Dolbow, Glen M Davis, Michael Welsch, Ashraf S Gorgey
{"title":"Benefits and interval training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A thematic review.","authors":"David R Dolbow,&nbsp;Glen M Davis,&nbsp;Michael Welsch,&nbsp;Ashraf S Gorgey","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2021.2002020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arm crank ergometry (ACE), functional electrical stimulation leg cycling exercise (FES-LCE), and the combination of the two (FES hybrid exercise) have all been used as activities to help improve the fitness-related health of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). More recently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has become popular in the non-disabled community due to its ability to produce greater aerobic fitness benefits or equivalent benefits with reduced time commitment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This thematic review of the literature sought to determine the potential benefits and practicality of using ACE, FES-LCE, and FES hybrid exercise in an interval training format for individuals with SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic literature searches were conducted in May 2020 and March 2021 focusing on interval training in individuals with SCI. Pre-defined nested search terms were used to narrow the available literature from 4273 citations to 1362 articles. The titles and abstracts were then reviewed to determine the appropriateness of the articles ending with fifteen articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature was limited to fifteen articles with low participant numbers (n = 1-20). However, in each article, HIIT protocols either demonstrated a greater improvement in cardiovascular, metabolic, or practicality scores compared to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) protocols, or improvement during relatively brief time commitments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The available literature lacked sufficient numbers of randomized control trials. However, the available evidence is encouraging concerning the potential benefits and practicality of using HIIT (ACE, FES-LCE, or FES hybrid exercise) to improve aerobic and anaerobic capacity and decrease cardiometabolic risk after SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":501560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"327-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135438/pdf/YSCM_45_2002020.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2021.2002020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arm crank ergometry (ACE), functional electrical stimulation leg cycling exercise (FES-LCE), and the combination of the two (FES hybrid exercise) have all been used as activities to help improve the fitness-related health of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). More recently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has become popular in the non-disabled community due to its ability to produce greater aerobic fitness benefits or equivalent benefits with reduced time commitment.

Objective: This thematic review of the literature sought to determine the potential benefits and practicality of using ACE, FES-LCE, and FES hybrid exercise in an interval training format for individuals with SCI.

Methods: Systematic literature searches were conducted in May 2020 and March 2021 focusing on interval training in individuals with SCI. Pre-defined nested search terms were used to narrow the available literature from 4273 citations to 1362 articles. The titles and abstracts were then reviewed to determine the appropriateness of the articles ending with fifteen articles.

Results: The literature was limited to fifteen articles with low participant numbers (n = 1-20). However, in each article, HIIT protocols either demonstrated a greater improvement in cardiovascular, metabolic, or practicality scores compared to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) protocols, or improvement during relatively brief time commitments.

Conclusion: The available literature lacked sufficient numbers of randomized control trials. However, the available evidence is encouraging concerning the potential benefits and practicality of using HIIT (ACE, FES-LCE, or FES hybrid exercise) to improve aerobic and anaerobic capacity and decrease cardiometabolic risk after SCI.

Abstract Image

对脊髓损伤个体的益处和间歇训练:专题综述。
背景:臂曲柄运动(ACE)、功能性电刺激腿部循环运动(FES- lce)以及两者的结合(FES混合运动)都被用作有助于改善脊髓损伤(SCI)患者健身相关健康的活动。最近,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)在非残疾人群体中变得流行起来,因为它能够在减少时间的情况下产生更大的有氧健身益处或同等的益处。目的:本专题文献综述旨在确定ACE、FES- lce和FES混合运动作为间歇训练形式对脊髓损伤患者的潜在益处和实用性。方法:在2020年5月和2021年3月进行了系统的文献检索,重点是SCI患者的间歇训练。使用预定义的嵌套搜索词将可用文献从4273条引文缩小到1362篇文章。然后审查标题和摘要,以确定以15篇文章结尾的文章的适当性。结果:文献限制为15篇,受试者人数较少(n = 1-20)。然而,在每篇文章中,与中等强度连续训练(MICT)方案相比,HIIT方案要么在心血管、代谢或实用性得分方面表现出更大的改善,要么在相对较短的时间内得到改善。结论:现有文献缺乏足够数量的随机对照试验。然而,关于使用HIIT (ACE、FES- lce或FES混合运动)改善脊髓损伤后有氧和无氧能力并降低心脏代谢风险的潜在益处和实用性,现有证据令人鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信