Which Septic Shock Patients With Non-Overt DIC Progress to DIC After Admission? Point-of-Care Thromboelastography Testing.

Sang-Min Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Gina Yu, Youn-Jung Kim, Won Young Kim
{"title":"Which Septic Shock Patients With Non-Overt DIC Progress to DIC After Admission? Point-of-Care Thromboelastography Testing.","authors":"Sang-Min Kim,&nbsp;Sang-Il Kim,&nbsp;Gina Yu,&nbsp;Youn-Jung Kim,&nbsp;Won Young Kim","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000001847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a life-threatening complication of septic shock; however, risk factors for its development after admission are unknown. Thromboelastography (TEG) can reflect coagulation disturbances in early non-overt DIC that are not detected by standard coagulation tests. This study investigated the risk factors including TEG findings as early predictors for DIC development after admission in septic shock patients with non-overt DIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observation study included 295 consecutive septic shock patients with non-overt DIC at admission between January 2016 and December 2019. DIC was defined as an International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) score ≥ 5. The primary outcome was non-overt DIC at admission that met the ISTH DIC criteria within 3 days after admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 295 patients with non-overt DIC, 89 (30.2%) developed DIC after admission. The DIC group showed a higher ISTH score and 28-day mortality rate than the non-DIC group (2 vs. 3, P < 0.001; 13.6% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.008, respectively). The DIC rate increased with the ISTH score (7.7%, 13.3%, 15.8%, 36.5%, and 61.4% for scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Among TEG values, the maximum amplitude (MA) was higher in the non-DIC group (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, an MA < 64 mm was independently associated with DIC development (odds ratio, 2.311; 95% confidence interval, 1.298-4.115).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DIC more often developed among those with admission ISTH scores ≥ 3 and was associated with higher mortality rates. An MA < 64 mm was independently associated with DIC development in septic shock patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":238832,"journal":{"name":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","volume":" ","pages":"168-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a life-threatening complication of septic shock; however, risk factors for its development after admission are unknown. Thromboelastography (TEG) can reflect coagulation disturbances in early non-overt DIC that are not detected by standard coagulation tests. This study investigated the risk factors including TEG findings as early predictors for DIC development after admission in septic shock patients with non-overt DIC.

Methods: This retrospective observation study included 295 consecutive septic shock patients with non-overt DIC at admission between January 2016 and December 2019. DIC was defined as an International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) score ≥ 5. The primary outcome was non-overt DIC at admission that met the ISTH DIC criteria within 3 days after admission.

Results: Of the 295 patients with non-overt DIC, 89 (30.2%) developed DIC after admission. The DIC group showed a higher ISTH score and 28-day mortality rate than the non-DIC group (2 vs. 3, P < 0.001; 13.6% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.008, respectively). The DIC rate increased with the ISTH score (7.7%, 13.3%, 15.8%, 36.5%, and 61.4% for scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Among TEG values, the maximum amplitude (MA) was higher in the non-DIC group (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, an MA < 64 mm was independently associated with DIC development (odds ratio, 2.311; 95% confidence interval, 1.298-4.115).

Conclusions: DIC more often developed among those with admission ISTH scores ≥ 3 and was associated with higher mortality rates. An MA < 64 mm was independently associated with DIC development in septic shock patients.

非显性DIC的感染性休克患者入院后哪些进展为DIC ?即时血栓弹性成像试验。
背景:弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)是感染性休克的一种危及生命的并发症;然而,入院后发展的危险因素尚不清楚。血栓弹性成像(TEG)可以反映早期非显性DIC的凝血障碍,这些障碍是标准凝血试验检测不到的。本研究探讨了感染性休克合并非显性DIC患者入院后发生DIC的早期预测因素,包括TEG结果。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入了295例2016年1月至2019年12月入院时伴有非显性DIC的感染性休克患者。DIC定义为国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)评分≥5分。主要结局为入院时非显性DIC,入院后3天内符合ISTH DIC标准。结果:295例非显性DIC患者中,89例(30.2%)在入院后发生DIC。与非DIC组相比,DIC组的ISTH评分和28天死亡率更高(2 vs. 3, P)。结论:入院时ISTH评分≥3的患者更容易发生DIC,且与较高的死亡率相关。一个马
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书