Adherence to protective measures among healthcare workers in the UK: a cross-sectional study.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-30 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2021-211454
Louise E Smith, Danai Serfioti, Dale Weston, Neil Greenberg, G James Rubin
{"title":"Adherence to protective measures among healthcare workers in the UK: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Louise E Smith,&nbsp;Danai Serfioti,&nbsp;Dale Weston,&nbsp;Neil Greenberg,&nbsp;G James Rubin","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2021-211454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare workers (HCWs) are frontline responders to emergency infectious disease outbreaks such as COVID-19. To avoid the rapid spread of disease, adherence to protective measures is paramount. We investigated rates of correct use of personal protective equipment (PPE), hand hygiene and physical distancing in UK HCWs who had been to their workplace at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and factors associated with adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an online cross-sectional survey of 1035 UK healthcare professionals (data collected 12-16 June 2020). We excluded those who had not been to their workplace in the previous 6 weeks, leaving us with a sample size of 831. Respondents were asked about their use of PPE, hand hygiene and physical distancing in the workplace. Frequency of uptake was reported descriptively; adjusted logistic regressions were used to separately investigate factors associated with adherence to use of PPE, maintaining good hand hygiene and physical distancing from colleagues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adherence to personal protective measures was suboptimal (PPE use: 80.0%, 95% CI 77.3 to 82.8; hand hygiene: 67.8%, 95% CI 64.6 to 71.0; coming into close contact with colleagues: 74.7%, 95% CI 71.7 to 77.7). Adherence to PPE use was associated with having received training about health and safety in the workplace for COVID-19, greater perceived social pressure to adopt the behaviour and availability of PPE. Non-adherence was associated with fatalism about COVID-19 and greater perceived difficulty of adopting protective measures. Workplace design using markings to facilitate distancing was associated with adherence to physical distancing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uptake of personal protective behaviours among UK HCWs at the start of the pandemic was variable. Factors associated with adherence provide insight into ways to support HCWs to adopt personal protective behaviours, such as ensuring that adequate PPE is available and designing workplaces to facilitate physical distancing.</p>","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":" ","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788253/pdf/","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are frontline responders to emergency infectious disease outbreaks such as COVID-19. To avoid the rapid spread of disease, adherence to protective measures is paramount. We investigated rates of correct use of personal protective equipment (PPE), hand hygiene and physical distancing in UK HCWs who had been to their workplace at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and factors associated with adherence.

Methods: We used an online cross-sectional survey of 1035 UK healthcare professionals (data collected 12-16 June 2020). We excluded those who had not been to their workplace in the previous 6 weeks, leaving us with a sample size of 831. Respondents were asked about their use of PPE, hand hygiene and physical distancing in the workplace. Frequency of uptake was reported descriptively; adjusted logistic regressions were used to separately investigate factors associated with adherence to use of PPE, maintaining good hand hygiene and physical distancing from colleagues.

Results: Adherence to personal protective measures was suboptimal (PPE use: 80.0%, 95% CI 77.3 to 82.8; hand hygiene: 67.8%, 95% CI 64.6 to 71.0; coming into close contact with colleagues: 74.7%, 95% CI 71.7 to 77.7). Adherence to PPE use was associated with having received training about health and safety in the workplace for COVID-19, greater perceived social pressure to adopt the behaviour and availability of PPE. Non-adherence was associated with fatalism about COVID-19 and greater perceived difficulty of adopting protective measures. Workplace design using markings to facilitate distancing was associated with adherence to physical distancing.

Conclusions: Uptake of personal protective behaviours among UK HCWs at the start of the pandemic was variable. Factors associated with adherence provide insight into ways to support HCWs to adopt personal protective behaviours, such as ensuring that adequate PPE is available and designing workplaces to facilitate physical distancing.

Abstract Image

英国医护人员对保护措施的依从性:一项横断面研究。
背景:卫生保健工作者(HCWs)是COVID-19等紧急传染病暴发的一线响应者。为避免疾病迅速传播,遵守保护措施至关重要。我们调查了在COVID-19大流行开始时去过工作场所的英国医护人员正确使用个人防护装备(PPE)、手部卫生和保持身体距离的比例以及与依从性相关的因素。方法:我们对1035名英国医疗保健专业人员进行了在线横断面调查(数据收集于2020年6月12日至16日)。我们排除了那些在过去6周内没有去过工作场所的人,留下了831个样本。受访者被问及他们在工作场所使用个人防护装备、手卫生和保持身体距离的情况。描述性地报告摄取频率;采用调整后的logistic回归分别调查与坚持使用个人防护装备、保持良好的手卫生和与同事保持身体距离相关的因素。结果:个人防护措施的依从性不理想(PPE使用:80.0%,95% CI 77.3至82.8;手卫生:67.8%,95%可信区间64.6 ~ 71.0;与同事密切接触:74.7%,95%可信区间为71.7 ~ 77.7)。坚持使用个人防护装备与接受过有关COVID-19工作场所健康和安全的培训、接受这种行为的更大社会压力以及个人防护装备的可获得性有关。不遵医嘱与对COVID-19的宿命论和采取保护措施的更大困难有关。使用标记来促进距离的工作场所设计与遵守物理距离有关。结论:在大流行开始时,英国卫生保健工作者的个人保护行为是不同的。与依从性相关的因素为支持卫生保健工作者采取个人保护行为的方法提供了见解,例如确保提供足够的个人防护装备和设计工作场所以促进身体距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信