Using machine learning to classify patients on opioid use.

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Pub Date : 2021-10-19 eCollection Date: 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1093/jphsr/rmab055
Shirong Zhao, Jamie Browning, Yan Cui, Junling Wang
{"title":"Using machine learning to classify patients on opioid use.","authors":"Shirong Zhao,&nbsp;Jamie Browning,&nbsp;Yan Cui,&nbsp;Junling Wang","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmab055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>High-frequent opioid use tends to increase an individual's risk of opioid use disorder, overdose and death. Thus, it is important to predict an individuals' opioid use frequency to improve opioid prescription utilization outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals receiving at least one opioid prescription from 2016 to 2018 in the national representative data, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, were included. This study applied five machine learning (ML) techniques, including support vector machine, random forest, neural network, gradient boosting and XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting), to predict opioid use frequency. This study compared the performance of these ML models with penalized logistic regression. The study outcome was whether an individual lied in the upper 10% of the opioid prescription distribution. Predictors were selected based on Gelberg-Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization. The prediction performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) in the test data. Patient characteristics as predictors for high-frequency use of opioids were ranked by the relative importance in prediction in the test data.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Random forest and gradient boosting achieved the top values of both AUROC and AUPRC, outperforming logistic regression and three other ML methods. In the best performing model, the random forest, the following characteristics had high predictive power in the frequency of opioid use: age, number of chronic conditions, public insurance and self-perceived health status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study demonstrate that ML techniques can be a promising and powerful technique in predicting the frequency of opioid use and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":"12 4","pages":"502-508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697024/pdf/rmab055.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmab055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: High-frequent opioid use tends to increase an individual's risk of opioid use disorder, overdose and death. Thus, it is important to predict an individuals' opioid use frequency to improve opioid prescription utilization outcomes.

Methods: Individuals receiving at least one opioid prescription from 2016 to 2018 in the national representative data, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, were included. This study applied five machine learning (ML) techniques, including support vector machine, random forest, neural network, gradient boosting and XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting), to predict opioid use frequency. This study compared the performance of these ML models with penalized logistic regression. The study outcome was whether an individual lied in the upper 10% of the opioid prescription distribution. Predictors were selected based on Gelberg-Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization. The prediction performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) in the test data. Patient characteristics as predictors for high-frequency use of opioids were ranked by the relative importance in prediction in the test data.

Key findings: Random forest and gradient boosting achieved the top values of both AUROC and AUPRC, outperforming logistic regression and three other ML methods. In the best performing model, the random forest, the following characteristics had high predictive power in the frequency of opioid use: age, number of chronic conditions, public insurance and self-perceived health status.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that ML techniques can be a promising and powerful technique in predicting the frequency of opioid use and health outcomes.

使用机器学习对使用阿片类药物的患者进行分类。
目的:频繁使用阿片类药物往往会增加个体阿片类药物使用障碍、过量和死亡的风险。因此,预测个体阿片类药物使用频率对于改善阿片类药物处方使用结果非常重要。方法:纳入2016 - 2018年全国代表性数据“医疗支出小组调查”中至少服用过一种阿片类药物处方的个人。本研究应用支持向量机、随机森林、神经网络、梯度增强和XGBoost(极端梯度增强)等五种机器学习技术预测阿片类药物使用频率。本研究比较了这些ML模型与惩罚逻辑回归的性能。研究结果是一个人是否位于阿片类药物处方分布的前10%。预测因子选择基于Gelberg-Andersen的卫生服务利用行为模型。采用测试数据中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和精确召回率曲线下面积(AUPRC)对预测效果进行评价。患者特征作为阿片类药物高频使用的预测因素,根据测试数据中预测的相对重要性进行排名。主要发现:随机森林和梯度增强实现了AUROC和AUPRC的最高值,优于逻辑回归和其他三种ML方法。在表现最好的随机森林模型中,以下特征对阿片类药物使用频率具有较高的预测能力:年龄、慢性病数量、公共保险和自我感知的健康状况。结论:本研究结果表明,ML技术在预测阿片类药物使用频率和健康结果方面可能是一种有前途和强大的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信