Multifaceted Assessment of the Effects of an Eye Exercise for Presbyopia.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yukari Tsuneyoshi, Kazuno Negishi, Kazuo Tsubota
{"title":"Multifaceted Assessment of the Effects of an Eye Exercise for Presbyopia.","authors":"Yukari Tsuneyoshi,&nbsp;Kazuno Negishi,&nbsp;Kazuo Tsubota","doi":"10.1089/rej.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise for presbyopia is theoretically ineffective. However, some studies have reported favorable subject responses, although the reasons were not detected. We investigated one such presbyopic exercise. Twenty-three volunteers (48.5 ± 5.0 years) viewed near (30-40 cm) and far (>5 m) points back and forth 20 times in one set and repeated this four times daily. After 2 months, the accommodation or near visual acuity did not improve. The pupillary size under accommodative stimulation decreased significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.04) from 4.03 ± 0.84 to 3.75 ± 0.98 mm, and the convergence amounts increased significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.03) from 0.71 ± 0.25 to 0.98 ± 0.46 mm. The overall satisfaction with the near vision improved significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The changes in the pupillary sizes and convergence amounts did not differ between subjects with improved satisfaction (positive group) and those without improvement (negative group) (<i>p</i> = 0.50 and <i>p</i> = 0.94, respectively). The pupillary size after exercise was significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.04) smaller in the positive group (3.19 ± 0.82) than in the negative group (4.08 ± 0.94). In conclusion, the exercise for presbyopia was fundamentally ineffective to improve accommodation, however, it strengthened miosis while viewing near and might improve satisfaction for near vision. (Clinical Trial Registration number: UMIN000023561).</p>","PeriodicalId":20979,"journal":{"name":"Rejuvenation research","volume":"24 6","pages":"417-423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rejuvenation research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2021.0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exercise for presbyopia is theoretically ineffective. However, some studies have reported favorable subject responses, although the reasons were not detected. We investigated one such presbyopic exercise. Twenty-three volunteers (48.5 ± 5.0 years) viewed near (30-40 cm) and far (>5 m) points back and forth 20 times in one set and repeated this four times daily. After 2 months, the accommodation or near visual acuity did not improve. The pupillary size under accommodative stimulation decreased significantly (p = 0.04) from 4.03 ± 0.84 to 3.75 ± 0.98 mm, and the convergence amounts increased significantly (p = 0.03) from 0.71 ± 0.25 to 0.98 ± 0.46 mm. The overall satisfaction with the near vision improved significantly (p = 0.02). The changes in the pupillary sizes and convergence amounts did not differ between subjects with improved satisfaction (positive group) and those without improvement (negative group) (p = 0.50 and p = 0.94, respectively). The pupillary size after exercise was significantly (p = 0.04) smaller in the positive group (3.19 ± 0.82) than in the negative group (4.08 ± 0.94). In conclusion, the exercise for presbyopia was fundamentally ineffective to improve accommodation, however, it strengthened miosis while viewing near and might improve satisfaction for near vision. (Clinical Trial Registration number: UMIN000023561).

眼保健操对老花眼效果的多方面评估。
运动治疗老花眼在理论上是无效的。然而,一些研究报告了良好的受试者反应,尽管没有发现原因。我们调查了一个这样的老花眼练习。23名志愿者(48.5±5.0岁)在一组中来回观察近(30-40厘米)和远(>5米)点20次,每天重复4次。2个月后,调节视力和近视力均无明显改善。调节刺激下瞳孔大小由4.03±0.84 mm显著减小(p = 0.04)至3.75±0.98 mm,收敛量由0.71±0.25 mm显著增大(p = 0.03)至0.98±0.46 mm。整体近视力满意度显著提高(p = 0.02)。满意度改善组(阳性组)和未改善组(阴性组)瞳孔大小和收敛量的变化无显著性差异(p = 0.50和p = 0.94)。阳性组运动后瞳孔大小(3.19±0.82)明显小于阴性组(4.08±0.94),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。总之,老花眼的锻炼对改善适应性是根本无效的,然而,它在近距离观看时加强了瞳孔缩小,并可能提高近距离视力的满意度。(临床试验注册号:UMIN000023561)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rejuvenation research
Rejuvenation research 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Rejuvenation Research publishes cutting-edge, peer-reviewed research on rejuvenation therapies in the laboratory and the clinic. The Journal focuses on key explorations and advances that may ultimately contribute to slowing or reversing the aging process, and covers topics such as cardiovascular aging, DNA damage and repair, cloning, and cell immortalization and senescence. Rejuvenation Research coverage includes: Cell immortalization and senescence Pluripotent stem cells DNA damage/repair Gene targeting, gene therapy, and genomics Growth factors and nutrient supply/sensing Immunosenescence Comparative biology of aging Tissue engineering Late-life pathologies (cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and others) Public policy and social context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信