The Necessity of CT Hip Scans in the Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures and Their Effect on Patient Management.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2021-11-18 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/8118147
Thomas Gatt, Daniel Cutajar, Lara Borg, Ryan Giordmaina
{"title":"The Necessity of CT Hip Scans in the Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures and Their Effect on Patient Management.","authors":"Thomas Gatt,&nbsp;Daniel Cutajar,&nbsp;Lara Borg,&nbsp;Ryan Giordmaina","doi":"10.1155/2021/8118147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic challenge of negative plain radiography in the context of a previously ambulatory patient is increasing with the rise in geriatric trauma. These patients are often diagnosed with small undisplaced fractures of the pelvis and femur which may not alter management. This study aims to assess the frequency at which computed tomography (CT) hip scans altered patient management and whether two X-ray projections of the hip affected fracture detection rate. All CT hip scans performed over a three-year period were identified retrospectively. Only CT hips pertaining to the identification of occult fractures were included in the study. A total of 447 (63.6%) CT hips were performed to exclude an occult fracture, which was only detected in 108 (24.1%) of the scans requested. The majority were subcapital (<i>n</i> = 58, 53.7%) or intertrochanteric (<i>n</i> = 39, 36.1%). There was no significant difference between fracture detection rates when comparing one and two views of the pelvis. 82.4% (<i>n</i> = 89) of occult hip fractures were managed operatively. CT imaging led to a change in patient management in 20% of cases. The frequency at which CT scan detects and alters management in occult hip fractures confirms the justification for its use. Increasing the number of X-ray projection views does not decrease the reliance on CT. Pelvic ring fractures are common in nonambulatory patients following trauma, and if confirmed on initial imaging, subsequent imaging to exclude a concurrent occult hip is unnecessary. The focus of further research should be towards the development of investigation algorithms which decrease the reliance on CT and defining the optimal surgical criteria for occult hip fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8118147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnostic challenge of negative plain radiography in the context of a previously ambulatory patient is increasing with the rise in geriatric trauma. These patients are often diagnosed with small undisplaced fractures of the pelvis and femur which may not alter management. This study aims to assess the frequency at which computed tomography (CT) hip scans altered patient management and whether two X-ray projections of the hip affected fracture detection rate. All CT hip scans performed over a three-year period were identified retrospectively. Only CT hips pertaining to the identification of occult fractures were included in the study. A total of 447 (63.6%) CT hips were performed to exclude an occult fracture, which was only detected in 108 (24.1%) of the scans requested. The majority were subcapital (n = 58, 53.7%) or intertrochanteric (n = 39, 36.1%). There was no significant difference between fracture detection rates when comparing one and two views of the pelvis. 82.4% (n = 89) of occult hip fractures were managed operatively. CT imaging led to a change in patient management in 20% of cases. The frequency at which CT scan detects and alters management in occult hip fractures confirms the justification for its use. Increasing the number of X-ray projection views does not decrease the reliance on CT. Pelvic ring fractures are common in nonambulatory patients following trauma, and if confirmed on initial imaging, subsequent imaging to exclude a concurrent occult hip is unnecessary. The focus of further research should be towards the development of investigation algorithms which decrease the reliance on CT and defining the optimal surgical criteria for occult hip fractures.

CT髋部扫描在隐匿性髋部骨折调查中的必要性及其对患者管理的影响。
随着老年创伤的增加,阴性x线平片在以前门诊患者中的诊断挑战也在增加。这些患者通常被诊断为骨盆和股骨的小未移位骨折,这可能不会改变治疗方法。本研究旨在评估计算机断层扫描(CT)髋关节扫描改变患者管理的频率,以及髋关节两次x线投影是否影响骨折检出率。回顾性分析三年内进行的所有髋关节CT扫描。本研究仅包括与隐匿性骨折鉴别相关的CT髋部。为了排除隐匿性骨折,总共进行了447次(63.6%)髋部CT检查,而隐匿性骨折仅在108次(24.1%)扫描中被发现。以亚资本型(n = 58, 53.7%)或转子间型(n = 39, 36.1%)居多。当比较骨盆的一种和两种视图时,骨折检出率没有显着差异。82.4% (n = 89)的隐匿性髋部骨折采用手术治疗。在20%的病例中,CT成像导致了患者管理的改变。CT扫描检测和改变隐匿性髋部骨折治疗的频率证实了其应用的合理性。增加x射线投影视图的数量并不能减少对CT的依赖。骨盆环骨折常见于创伤后非卧床患者,如果初步影像学证实,后续影像学排除并发隐匿性髋关节是不必要的。进一步研究的重点应该是研究算法的发展,以减少对CT的依赖,并确定隐匿性髋部骨折的最佳手术标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信