The "Urbild" of "Einbildung": The Archetype in the Imagination in Eighteenth-Century German Aesthetics.

IF 0.6 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1353/jhi.2021.0033

Julian Johannes Koch

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article outlines what is arguably the uniquely German trajectory of the imagination, focusing on the relation between the imagination and "Urbild" in eighteenth-century German aesthetics, particularly in Kant and Schelling. I contend that shared German roots of the "Einbildung" (imagination) and "Urbild" (archetype) in "Bild" led German aesthetic thinkers to conceive of the imagination much more in (Neo-)Platonic terms. This article therefore argues that there is a perceptible rift in how the imagination is conceived in eighteenth-century discourse which follows a linguistic fault line between the Latin-origin "imagination" and the German "Einbildung."

查看原文本刊更多论文

“寓教于乐”的“城市”:18世纪德国美学想象中的原型。

本文概述了德国独特的想象轨迹，重点关注18世纪德国美学，特别是康德和谢林的想象与“城市”之间的关系。我认为，《图片》中“Einbildung”(想象)和“Urbild”(原型)的共同德国根源使德国美学思想家更多地以(新)柏拉图式的术语来构想想象力。因此，本文认为，在18世纪的话语中，想象是如何被构思出来的，这是一个明显的裂缝，它遵循了拉丁语起源的“想象”和德语的“想象”之间的语言断层线。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.