Practice Patterns and Assessment of Needs for Pediatric Pain Management in Alberta Emergency Departments.

Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM Pub Date : 2021-12-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S337900
Neta Bar Am, Jennifer Thull-Freedman, Samina Ali
{"title":"Practice Patterns and Assessment of Needs for Pediatric Pain Management in Alberta Emergency Departments.","authors":"Neta Bar Am,&nbsp;Jennifer Thull-Freedman,&nbsp;Samina Ali","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S337900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many rural and community emergency departments (EDs) experience barriers to providing optimal pain care to children. In preparation for a quality improvement initiative, our team conducted a provincial pediatric pain management practice and needs assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to ED administrators and educators from March to May 2017. Themes included pain assessment, pain and distress management strategies, available resources, education, barriers to care, and opportunities for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five respondents, from 31 EDs representing all five geographic health zones in Alberta, completed the survey. Use of a pain assessment tool was reported at 93.5% (29/31 sites) of the sites. Topical anesthesia was employed \"most of the time\" before suturing at 67% (18/27) of sites, versus 15% (4/27) before blood work or IV insertion. Eighty-one percent (22/27) of sites reported physically restraining children for procedures \"often\", while 37% (10/27) reported use of comfort positioning \"often\". Digital distraction devices were available at 37% (10/27) of sites. Reported challenges included lack of resources (33.3%, 12/36), staff education/knowledge (33.3%, 12/36), and absent policies/poor policy adherence (25.0%, 9/36). Opportunities for improvement included staff member education (73.5%, 25/34) and more resources (58.8%, 20/34). Respondents rated their site's overall ability to manage children's pain as 50/100 [IQR:21,61].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General EDs report providing suboptimal children's pain care, with use of physical restraint for medical procedures, and under-utilization of evidence-based, inexpensive treatment options. There are many gaps in children's pain care in rural and community EDs which could be addressed through collaborative quality improvement initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":"13 ","pages":"587-594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/95/oaem-13-587.PMC8714010.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S337900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many rural and community emergency departments (EDs) experience barriers to providing optimal pain care to children. In preparation for a quality improvement initiative, our team conducted a provincial pediatric pain management practice and needs assessment.

Methods: An online survey was sent to ED administrators and educators from March to May 2017. Themes included pain assessment, pain and distress management strategies, available resources, education, barriers to care, and opportunities for improvement.

Results: Forty-five respondents, from 31 EDs representing all five geographic health zones in Alberta, completed the survey. Use of a pain assessment tool was reported at 93.5% (29/31 sites) of the sites. Topical anesthesia was employed "most of the time" before suturing at 67% (18/27) of sites, versus 15% (4/27) before blood work or IV insertion. Eighty-one percent (22/27) of sites reported physically restraining children for procedures "often", while 37% (10/27) reported use of comfort positioning "often". Digital distraction devices were available at 37% (10/27) of sites. Reported challenges included lack of resources (33.3%, 12/36), staff education/knowledge (33.3%, 12/36), and absent policies/poor policy adherence (25.0%, 9/36). Opportunities for improvement included staff member education (73.5%, 25/34) and more resources (58.8%, 20/34). Respondents rated their site's overall ability to manage children's pain as 50/100 [IQR:21,61].

Conclusion: General EDs report providing suboptimal children's pain care, with use of physical restraint for medical procedures, and under-utilization of evidence-based, inexpensive treatment options. There are many gaps in children's pain care in rural and community EDs which could be addressed through collaborative quality improvement initiatives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿尔伯塔省急诊科儿科疼痛管理的实践模式和需求评估。
目的:许多农村和社区急诊科(ed)在为儿童提供最佳疼痛护理方面遇到障碍。在准备质量改进倡议,我们的团队进行了省级儿科疼痛管理实践和需求评估。方法:于2017年3月至5月对教育管理人员和教育工作者进行在线调查。主题包括疼痛评估、疼痛和痛苦管理策略、可用资源、教育、护理障碍和改善机会。结果:来自代表艾伯塔省所有五个地理卫生区的31个急诊室的45名受访者完成了调查。93.5%(29/31个部位)使用了疼痛评估工具。67%(18/27)的部位在缝合前“大多数时间”使用表面麻醉,而15%(4/27)的部位在采血或静脉注射前使用表面麻醉。81%(22/27)的网站报告说,“经常”对儿童进行身体限制,而37%(10/27)的网站报告说,“经常”使用舒适的姿势。37%(10/27)的站点使用数字分散设备。报告的挑战包括缺乏资源(33.3%,12/36),员工教育/知识(33.3%,12/36),以及缺乏政策/政策依从性差(25.0%,9/36)。改进机会包括工作人员教育(73.5%,25/34)和更多资源(58.8%,20/34)。受访者将他们的网站管理儿童疼痛的总体能力评为50/100 [IQR:21,61]。结论:普通急诊科报告提供了次优的儿童疼痛护理,在医疗过程中使用了身体约束,并且没有充分利用循证、廉价的治疗方案。农村和社区急诊科在儿童疼痛护理方面存在许多差距,这些差距可以通过协作性质量改进举措加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信