To RAP or Not to RAP: A Retrospective Comparison of the Effects of Retrograde Autologous Priming.

Q2 Health Professions
Emily Foreman, Morgan Eddy, Jenny Holdcombe, Phoebe Warren, Lisa Gebicke, Pamela Raney, Wilson Clements, James Zellner
{"title":"To RAP or Not to RAP: A Retrospective Comparison of the Effects of Retrograde Autologous Priming.","authors":"Emily Foreman,&nbsp;Morgan Eddy,&nbsp;Jenny Holdcombe,&nbsp;Phoebe Warren,&nbsp;Lisa Gebicke,&nbsp;Pamela Raney,&nbsp;Wilson Clements,&nbsp;James Zellner","doi":"10.1182/ject-2100031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retrograde autologous priming (RAP) is a process used to reduce hemodilution associated with the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Previous studies have reported potential benefits to RAP; however, many of these studies do not evaluate the benefits of RAP with limited preoperative fluid administration combined with a condensed CPB circuit. We examined clinical metrics of patients who underwent RAP versus those who did not undergo RAP prior to the initiation of CPB. This was a retrospective data review of 1,303 patients who underwent CPB in the setting of open-heart surgery for a 2-year period. RAP was used on all patients between June 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018 (<i>n</i> = 519) and not used on patients between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019 (<i>n</i> = 784). Both groups were subjected to a low-prime CPB circuit volume of 800-900 mL. We compared the clinical metrics for packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, oxygen delivery, postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), Albumin utilization, ventilator time, Intensive Care Unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and 30-day mortality between the two groups. Our data analysis showed there were no statistically significantly differences between the two groups on the incidence of postoperative AKI, PRBC administration, ventilator time, ICU LOS or 30-day mortality. In the RAP group, there was a statistically significant lower oxygen delivery and a statistically significant increased volume of Albumin administered postoperatively, although those differences were so small, they were potentially not clinically significant. Our analysis revealed no significant benefit to performing RAP with limited preoperative fluid administration and minimized CPB circuit prime volume. We formalized a process that included limiting preoperative fluid administration and minimizing the CPB circuit volume so that we were not required to RAP and did not simultaneously sacrifice patient outcomes in other areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":39644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","volume":"53 4","pages":"279-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717721/pdf/ject-53-279.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/ject-2100031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrograde autologous priming (RAP) is a process used to reduce hemodilution associated with the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Previous studies have reported potential benefits to RAP; however, many of these studies do not evaluate the benefits of RAP with limited preoperative fluid administration combined with a condensed CPB circuit. We examined clinical metrics of patients who underwent RAP versus those who did not undergo RAP prior to the initiation of CPB. This was a retrospective data review of 1,303 patients who underwent CPB in the setting of open-heart surgery for a 2-year period. RAP was used on all patients between June 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018 (n = 519) and not used on patients between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019 (n = 784). Both groups were subjected to a low-prime CPB circuit volume of 800-900 mL. We compared the clinical metrics for packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, oxygen delivery, postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), Albumin utilization, ventilator time, Intensive Care Unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and 30-day mortality between the two groups. Our data analysis showed there were no statistically significantly differences between the two groups on the incidence of postoperative AKI, PRBC administration, ventilator time, ICU LOS or 30-day mortality. In the RAP group, there was a statistically significant lower oxygen delivery and a statistically significant increased volume of Albumin administered postoperatively, although those differences were so small, they were potentially not clinically significant. Our analysis revealed no significant benefit to performing RAP with limited preoperative fluid administration and minimized CPB circuit prime volume. We formalized a process that included limiting preoperative fluid administration and minimizing the CPB circuit volume so that we were not required to RAP and did not simultaneously sacrifice patient outcomes in other areas.

至RAP或不至RAP:逆行自体启动效果的回顾性比较。
逆行自体启动(RAP)是一种用于减少与体外循环(CPB)启动相关的血液稀释的过程。先前的研究报告了RAP的潜在益处;然而,这些研究中的许多并没有评估RAP在术前有限的液体给药结合冷凝CPB循环的情况下的益处。我们检查了在CPB开始前接受RAP和未接受RAP的患者的临床指标。这是一项对1303名患者的回顾性数据回顾,这些患者在心脏直视手术中接受了为期2年的CPB。RAP用于2017年6月1日至2018年6月30日期间的所有患者(n = 519),在2018年7月1日至2019年6月30日期间未用于患者(n = 784)。两组均接受800-900 mL的低初始CPB循环容量。我们比较了两组之间填充红细胞(PRBC)输注、氧气输送、术后急性肾损伤(AKI)、白蛋白利用率、呼吸机时间、重症监护室住院时间(ICU LOS)和30天死亡率的临床指标。我们的数据分析显示,两组在术后AKI、PRBC给药、呼吸机时间、ICU LOS或30天死亡率方面没有统计学上的显著差异。在RAP组中,术后输氧量显著降低,白蛋白给药量显著增加,尽管这些差异很小,但可能没有临床意义。我们的分析显示,在术前液体给药有限且CPB回路充注量最小化的情况下进行RAP没有显著益处。我们正式制定了一个流程,包括限制术前液体给药和最大限度地减少CPB回路容量,这样我们就不需要RAP,也不会同时牺牲其他领域的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Journal of Extracorporeal Technology is dedicated to the study and practice of Basic Science and Clinical issues related to extracorporeal circulation. Areas emphasized in the Journal include: •Cardiopulmonary Bypass •Cardiac Surgery •Cardiovascular Anesthesia •Hematology •Blood Management •Physiology •Fluid Dynamics •Laboratory Science •Coagulation and Hematology •Transfusion •Business Practices •Pediatric Perfusion •Total Quality Management • Evidence-Based Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信