Providers at a Midwestern Academic System Report a Positive Experience with Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Jenna Berg, Kristy Carlson, Sarah Richards
{"title":"Providers at a Midwestern Academic System Report a Positive Experience with Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Jenna Berg,&nbsp;Kristy Carlson,&nbsp;Sarah Richards","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been rapid expansion in the use of telehealth. As a result, many providers who had no prior experience using telehealth are now using it to provide patient care. The goal of this study was to survey health care providers on a wide range of telehealth topics including their experiences examining and connecting with patients digitally, identifying which types of patients may be best suited to telehealth, and identifying technical and logistical areas for improvement when using telehealth. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Physicians and advanced practice providers (n = 944) at a large midwestern academic system were invited to complete an anonymous online survey during a 2-week period in October 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Surveys, completed and analyzed (n = 178), indicated 86.6% of respondents felt confident in their clinical assessment, and 86.1% felt they formed an adequate personal connection with the patient in the majority of telehealth visits. A majority (58.5%) of providers felt telehealth was not effective for new patients, but 83% of providers felt it was effective for providing care to established patients. Respondents identified several areas for technological improvement including issues with video (27.5%) and audio (16.8%) quality. In 24.4% of visits, these technology issues were severe enough providers needed to convert an audiovisual appointment to telephone. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Provider experience with telehealth has largely been positive at our institution. Although telehealth may not be appropriate for new patients, providers did feel it was an effective means of providing care for established patients. To continue improving the quality of telehealth, a multiteam approach should be considered, including members of technology and clinical operations teams working closely with those providers experienced in telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1379-1385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been rapid expansion in the use of telehealth. As a result, many providers who had no prior experience using telehealth are now using it to provide patient care. The goal of this study was to survey health care providers on a wide range of telehealth topics including their experiences examining and connecting with patients digitally, identifying which types of patients may be best suited to telehealth, and identifying technical and logistical areas for improvement when using telehealth. Methods: Physicians and advanced practice providers (n = 944) at a large midwestern academic system were invited to complete an anonymous online survey during a 2-week period in October 2020. Results: Surveys, completed and analyzed (n = 178), indicated 86.6% of respondents felt confident in their clinical assessment, and 86.1% felt they formed an adequate personal connection with the patient in the majority of telehealth visits. A majority (58.5%) of providers felt telehealth was not effective for new patients, but 83% of providers felt it was effective for providing care to established patients. Respondents identified several areas for technological improvement including issues with video (27.5%) and audio (16.8%) quality. In 24.4% of visits, these technology issues were severe enough providers needed to convert an audiovisual appointment to telephone. Conclusions: Provider experience with telehealth has largely been positive at our institution. Although telehealth may not be appropriate for new patients, providers did feel it was an effective means of providing care for established patients. To continue improving the quality of telehealth, a multiteam approach should be considered, including members of technology and clinical operations teams working closely with those providers experienced in telehealth.

中西部学术系统的提供者报告了在COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗的积极经验。
导言:自2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发以来,远程医疗的使用迅速扩大。因此,许多以前没有使用远程保健经验的提供者现在使用它来提供病人护理。本研究的目的是就广泛的远程医疗主题调查卫生保健提供者,包括他们以数字方式检查和联系患者的经验,确定哪种类型的患者可能最适合远程医疗,并确定在使用远程医疗时需要改进的技术和后勤领域。方法:邀请中西部一个大型学术系统的医生和高级执业医师(n = 944)在2020年10月为期2周的时间内完成一项匿名在线调查。结果:完成和分析的调查(n = 178)表明,86.6%的受访者对他们的临床评估有信心,86.1%的受访者认为他们在大多数远程医疗访问中与患者形成了充分的个人联系。大多数(58.5%)的医疗服务提供者认为远程医疗对新患者无效,但83%的医疗服务提供者认为远程医疗对老患者有效。受访者指出了几个需要技术改进的领域,包括视频(27.5%)和音频(16.8%)质量问题。在24.4%的就诊中,这些技术问题严重到供应商需要将视听预约转换为电话预约。结论:在我们的机构,远程医疗服务提供者的经验在很大程度上是积极的。虽然远程保健可能不适合新患者,但提供者确实认为这是为已患病的患者提供护理的有效手段。为继续提高远程保健的质量,应考虑采用多团队方法,包括技术和临床业务团队成员与远程保健经验丰富的提供者密切合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信