Romanian psychiatric residents' opinions on factors that influence their decision to emigrate: A 5-year follow-up study

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Adriana Mihai MD, PhD, Silvia Maria Trandafir MD, PhD, Lavinia Duica MD, PhD, Alex Mihai MD, Cosmin Lungu MD, Mihail Cristian Pirlog PhD
{"title":"Romanian psychiatric residents' opinions on factors that influence their decision to emigrate: A 5-year follow-up study","authors":"Adriana Mihai MD, PhD,&nbsp;Silvia Maria Trandafir MD, PhD,&nbsp;Lavinia Duica MD, PhD,&nbsp;Alex Mihai MD,&nbsp;Cosmin Lungu MD,&nbsp;Mihail Cristian Pirlog PhD","doi":"10.1111/appy.12507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the situation of migration of psychiatrists from Romania and a prioritization exercise of main factors related with psychiatric residents' decision to emigrate could be a starting point of elaboration of a strategy of reforms. Important changes have been done in economic status of residents in 2018. The impact of these measures in changing opinions was checked.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a cross sectional evaluation study on a randomized selected sample of Romanian psychiatric residents' opinions on factors that influence decision of migration in EU countries in two time points, 2015 and 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-eight percent of residents intend to work abroad comparing with 78% before the economic changes (25.8% vs. 71.7% for a limited period of time and 15.7% vs. 28.3% intend to emigrate) and 2% vs. 5% intend to leave the specialty. The important factors for decision to emigrate changed from “Better working conditions” (15.7% vs. 37.3% residents) to “Better training”; the factor “respect and appreciation by colleagues” remained important for 19.1% versus 17.9%. “Lack of working place for partner” was considered by 26.7% of responders as an important disadvantage of working abroad. “Being far from family members”, which was considered 5 years ago by 64.2% of responders as an important disadvantage of working abroad, nowadays concerns only 6.7%, probably because it seems easier to go abroad together with the family members.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The factors (better training in psychiatry and psychotherapy, better supervision, more involvement in research) that influence the residents' decision to emigrate represent the starting points for future reforms in educational and medical system in psychiatry.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8618,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.12507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate the situation of migration of psychiatrists from Romania and a prioritization exercise of main factors related with psychiatric residents' decision to emigrate could be a starting point of elaboration of a strategy of reforms. Important changes have been done in economic status of residents in 2018. The impact of these measures in changing opinions was checked.

Methods

This is a cross sectional evaluation study on a randomized selected sample of Romanian psychiatric residents' opinions on factors that influence decision of migration in EU countries in two time points, 2015 and 2020.

Results

Thirty-eight percent of residents intend to work abroad comparing with 78% before the economic changes (25.8% vs. 71.7% for a limited period of time and 15.7% vs. 28.3% intend to emigrate) and 2% vs. 5% intend to leave the specialty. The important factors for decision to emigrate changed from “Better working conditions” (15.7% vs. 37.3% residents) to “Better training”; the factor “respect and appreciation by colleagues” remained important for 19.1% versus 17.9%. “Lack of working place for partner” was considered by 26.7% of responders as an important disadvantage of working abroad. “Being far from family members”, which was considered 5 years ago by 64.2% of responders as an important disadvantage of working abroad, nowadays concerns only 6.7%, probably because it seems easier to go abroad together with the family members.

Conclusions

The factors (better training in psychiatry and psychotherapy, better supervision, more involvement in research) that influence the residents' decision to emigrate represent the starting points for future reforms in educational and medical system in psychiatry.

罗马尼亚精神病住院患者对影响其移民决定因素的看法:一项5年随访研究
评估来自罗马尼亚的精神科医生的移民情况,并对与精神科住院医生决定移民有关的主要因素进行优先排序,可以作为制定改革战略的起点。2018年,居民经济地位发生重大变化。这些措施对改变意见的影响得到了检验。方法对2015年和2020年两个时间点罗马尼亚精神病患者对欧盟国家移民决策影响因素的看法进行横断面评估研究。结果38%的居民打算在国外工作,而经济变化前为78%(25.8%对71.7%,15.7%对28.3%打算移民),2%对5%打算离开专业。决定移民的重要因素由“更好的工作条件”(15.7%对37.3%)转变为“更好的培训”;19.1%对17.9%的受访者认为“同事的尊重和欣赏”仍然很重要。26.7%的受访者认为“没有伴侣的工作场所”是在国外工作的一个重要缺点。5年前,64.2%的受访者认为“远离家人”是出国工作的一个重要缺点,而现在只有6.7%的人这样认为,可能是因为与家人一起出国似乎更容易。结论影响居民移民决策的因素(更好的精神病学和心理治疗培训、更好的监管、更多的研究参与)代表了未来精神病学教育和医疗体制改革的出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Psychiatry is an international psychiatric journal focused on the Asia and Pacific Rim region, and is the official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrics. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry enables psychiatric and other mental health professionals in the region to share their research, education programs and clinical experience with a larger international readership. The journal offers a venue for high quality research for and from the region in the face of minimal international publication availability for authors concerned with the region. This includes findings highlighting the diversity in psychiatric behaviour, treatment and outcome related to social, ethnic, cultural and economic differences of the region. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and reviews, as well as clinically and educationally focused papers on regional best practices. Images, videos, a young psychiatrist''s corner, meeting reports, a journal club and contextual commentaries differentiate this journal from existing main stream psychiatry journals that are focused on other regions, or nationally focused within countries of Asia and the Pacific Rim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信