Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development.

Carl R May, Bianca Albers, Mike Bracher, Tracy L Finch, Anthony Gilbert, Melissa Girling, Kathryn Greenwood, Anne MacFarlane, Frances S Mair, Christine M May, Elizabeth Murray, Sebastian Potthoff, Tim Rapley
{"title":"Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development.","authors":"Carl R May,&nbsp;Bianca Albers,&nbsp;Mike Bracher,&nbsp;Tracy L Finch,&nbsp;Anthony Gilbert,&nbsp;Melissa Girling,&nbsp;Kathryn Greenwood,&nbsp;Anne MacFarlane,&nbsp;Frances S Mair,&nbsp;Christine M May,&nbsp;Elizabeth Murray,&nbsp;Sebastian Potthoff,&nbsp;Tim Rapley","doi":"10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) is frequently used to inform qualitative research that aims to explain and evaluate processes that shape late-stage translation of innovations in the organisation and delivery of healthcare. A coding manual for qualitative researchers using NPT will facilitate transparent data analysis processes and will also reduce the cognitive and practical burden on researchers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(a) To simplify the theory for the user. (b) To describe the purposes, methods of development, and potential application of a coding manual that translates normalisation process theory (NPT) into an easily usable framework for qualitative analysis. (c) To present an NPT coding manual that is ready for use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative content analysis of papers and chapters that developed normalisation process theory, selection and structuring of theory constructs, and testing constructs against interview data and published empirical studies using NPT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A coding manual for NPT was developed. It consists of 12 primary NPT constructs and conforms to the Context-Mechanism-Outcome configuration of realist evaluation studies. Contexts are defined as settings in which implementation work is done, in which strategic intentions, adaptive execution, negotiating capability, and reframing organisational logics are enacted. Mechanisms are defined as the work that people do when they participate in implementation processes and include coherence-building, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. Outcomes are defined as effects that make visible how things change as implementation processes proceed and include intervention mobilisation, normative restructuring, relational restructuring, and sustainment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The coding manual is ready to use and performs three important tasks. It consolidates several iterations of theory development, makes the application of NPT simpler for the user, and links NPT constructs to realist evaluation methods. The coding manual forms the core of a translational framework for implementation research and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861599/pdf/","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Background: Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) is frequently used to inform qualitative research that aims to explain and evaluate processes that shape late-stage translation of innovations in the organisation and delivery of healthcare. A coding manual for qualitative researchers using NPT will facilitate transparent data analysis processes and will also reduce the cognitive and practical burden on researchers.

Objectives: (a) To simplify the theory for the user. (b) To describe the purposes, methods of development, and potential application of a coding manual that translates normalisation process theory (NPT) into an easily usable framework for qualitative analysis. (c) To present an NPT coding manual that is ready for use.

Method: Qualitative content analysis of papers and chapters that developed normalisation process theory, selection and structuring of theory constructs, and testing constructs against interview data and published empirical studies using NPT.

Results: A coding manual for NPT was developed. It consists of 12 primary NPT constructs and conforms to the Context-Mechanism-Outcome configuration of realist evaluation studies. Contexts are defined as settings in which implementation work is done, in which strategic intentions, adaptive execution, negotiating capability, and reframing organisational logics are enacted. Mechanisms are defined as the work that people do when they participate in implementation processes and include coherence-building, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. Outcomes are defined as effects that make visible how things change as implementation processes proceed and include intervention mobilisation, normative restructuring, relational restructuring, and sustainment.

Conclusion: The coding manual is ready to use and performs three important tasks. It consolidates several iterations of theory development, makes the application of NPT simpler for the user, and links NPT constructs to realist evaluation methods. The coding manual forms the core of a translational framework for implementation research and evaluation.

Abstract Image

实施评估和研究的翻译框架:定性研究和工具开发的规范化过程理论编码手册。
背景:正常化过程理论(NPT)经常被用来为定性研究提供信息,旨在解释和评估塑造医疗保健组织和交付创新的后期翻译的过程。为使用NPT的定性研究人员编写编码手册将促进透明的数据分析过程,也将减轻研究人员的认知和实际负担。目标:(a)为用户简化理论。(b)描述将规范化过程理论(NPT)转化为易于使用的定性分析框架的编码手册的目的、开发方法和潜在应用。(c)提出一份可供使用的《不扩散条约》编码手册。方法:对论文和章节进行定性内容分析,这些论文和章节发展了规范化过程理论,选择和构建了理论结构,并对访谈数据和使用NPT发表的实证研究进行了测试。结果:编制了NPT编码手册。它由12个主要NPT结构组成,符合现实评价研究的情境-机制-结果结构。上下文被定义为执行工作完成的环境,其中制定了战略意图、适应性执行、谈判能力和重新构建组织逻辑。机制被定义为人们在参与实施过程时所做的工作,包括一致性建设、认知参与、集体行动和反射性监测。结果的定义是,随着实施过程的进行,可以看到事物如何变化的效果,包括干预动员、规范重组、关系重组和维持。结论:编码手册易于使用,并完成了三个重要任务。它巩固了理论发展的几次迭代,使NPT的应用对用户来说更简单,并将NPT结构与现实的评估方法联系起来。编码手册构成了实施研究和评估的翻译框架的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信