Artificial intelligence trained with integration of multiparametric MR-US imaging data and fusion biopsy trajectory-proven pathology data for 3D prediction of prostate cancer: A proof-of-concept study.

The Prostate Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1002/pros.24321
Masatomo Kaneko, Norio Fukuda, Hitomi Nagano, Kaori Yamada, Kei Yamada, Eiichi Konishi, Yoshinobu Sato, Osamu Ukimura
{"title":"Artificial intelligence trained with integration of multiparametric MR-US imaging data and fusion biopsy trajectory-proven pathology data for 3D prediction of prostate cancer: A proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Masatomo Kaneko,&nbsp;Norio Fukuda,&nbsp;Hitomi Nagano,&nbsp;Kaori Yamada,&nbsp;Kei Yamada,&nbsp;Eiichi Konishi,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Sato,&nbsp;Osamu Ukimura","doi":"10.1002/pros.24321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that predicts the volume and location of clinically significant cancer (CSCa) using convolutional neural network (CNN) trained with integration of multiparametric MR-US image data and MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy (MRI-US PBx) trajectory-proven pathology data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty consecutive patients prospectively underwent MRI-US PBx, followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The AI algorithm was trained with the integration of MR-US image data with a MRI-US PBx trajectory-proven pathology. The relationship with the 3D-cancer-mapping of RARP specimens was compared between AI system-suggested 3D-CSCa mapping and an experienced radiologist's suggested 3D-CSCa mapping on MRI alone according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2. The characteristics of detected and undetected tumors at AI were compared in 22,968 image data. The relationships between CSCa volumes and volumes predicted by AI as well as the radiologist's reading based on PI-RADS were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concordance of the CSCa center with that in RARP specimens was significantly higher in the AI prediction than the radiologist' reading (83% vs. 54%, p = 0.036). CSCa volumes predicted with AI were more accurate (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) than the radiologist's reading. The limitations include that the elastic fusion technology has its own registration error.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We presented a novel pilot AI algorithm for 3D prediction of PCa. AI was trained by integration of multiparametric MR-US image data and fusion biopsy trajectory-proven pathology data. This deep learning AI model may more precisely predict the 3D mapping of CSCa in its volume and center location than a radiologist's reading based on PI-RADS version 2, and has potential in the planning of focal therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"793-803"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that predicts the volume and location of clinically significant cancer (CSCa) using convolutional neural network (CNN) trained with integration of multiparametric MR-US image data and MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy (MRI-US PBx) trajectory-proven pathology data.

Methods: Twenty consecutive patients prospectively underwent MRI-US PBx, followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The AI algorithm was trained with the integration of MR-US image data with a MRI-US PBx trajectory-proven pathology. The relationship with the 3D-cancer-mapping of RARP specimens was compared between AI system-suggested 3D-CSCa mapping and an experienced radiologist's suggested 3D-CSCa mapping on MRI alone according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2. The characteristics of detected and undetected tumors at AI were compared in 22,968 image data. The relationships between CSCa volumes and volumes predicted by AI as well as the radiologist's reading based on PI-RADS were analyzed.

Results: The concordance of the CSCa center with that in RARP specimens was significantly higher in the AI prediction than the radiologist' reading (83% vs. 54%, p = 0.036). CSCa volumes predicted with AI were more accurate (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) than the radiologist's reading. The limitations include that the elastic fusion technology has its own registration error.

Conclusions: We presented a novel pilot AI algorithm for 3D prediction of PCa. AI was trained by integration of multiparametric MR-US image data and fusion biopsy trajectory-proven pathology data. This deep learning AI model may more precisely predict the 3D mapping of CSCa in its volume and center location than a radiologist's reading based on PI-RADS version 2, and has potential in the planning of focal therapy.

整合多参数磁共振成像数据和融合活检轨迹证实的前列腺癌3D预测病理数据的人工智能:一项概念验证研究。
背景:我们的目标是开发一种人工智能(AI)算法,该算法使用卷积神经网络(CNN)来预测临床显著性癌症(CSCa)的体积和位置,卷积神经网络(CNN)集成了多参数磁共振-美国图像数据和磁共振-美国融合前列腺活检(MRI-US PBx)轨迹证明的病理数据。方法:连续20例患者前瞻性接受MRI-US PBx,随后进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)。人工智能算法通过整合MRI-US图像数据和MRI-US PBx轨迹证明的病理进行训练。根据前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)版本2,比较AI系统建议的3D-CSCa制图和经验丰富的放射科医生建议的单独MRI 3D-CSCa制图与RARP标本的3d癌症制图的关系。比较22968张图像数据中AI检测到和未检测到肿瘤的特征。分析CSCa体积与人工智能预测的体积之间的关系以及放射科医生基于PI-RADS的读数。结果:人工智能预测的CSCa中心与RARP标本的一致性明显高于放射科医生的读数(83%对54%,p = 0.036)。结论:我们提出了一种新的用于PCa三维预测的AI先导算法。人工智能通过整合多参数MR-US图像数据和融合活检轨迹证实的病理数据进行训练。这种深度学习人工智能模型可以比放射科医生基于PI-RADS版本2的读数更准确地预测CSCa的体积和中心位置的3D映射,并且在局灶治疗的规划中具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书