A Systematic Review of the Scope of Study of mHealth Interventions for Wellness and Related Challenges in Pediatric and Young Adult Populations.

Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2022-02-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AHMT.S342811
Sarah J Bond, Nathan Parikh, Shrey Majmudar, Sabrina Pin, Christine Wang, Lauren Willis, Susanne B Haga
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Scope of Study of mHealth Interventions for Wellness and Related Challenges in Pediatric and Young Adult Populations.","authors":"Sarah J Bond,&nbsp;Nathan Parikh,&nbsp;Shrey Majmudar,&nbsp;Sabrina Pin,&nbsp;Christine Wang,&nbsp;Lauren Willis,&nbsp;Susanne B Haga","doi":"10.2147/AHMT.S342811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the purported advantages and potential efficacy of mHealth interventions to promote wellness in children, adolescents, and young adults, it is not clear what areas have been explored and the challenges reported in the biomedical literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of publications between 2015 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 54 papers that met our inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in 21 countries and ranged in size from six to 9851 participants (median: 184). A total of 41% of studies enrolled adolescents only (n = 19). Of the seven types of mHealth interventions identified, apps were the most common intervention (59%; n = 32) evaluated and 44% of the studies evaluated two or more interventions. The most common topic of the studies reviewed was sexual and reproductive health (24%; n = 13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most pediatric mHealth intervention studies are conducted in adolescents in large part, and sexual and reproductive health is the most commonly studied topic. With the easy and widespread accessibility to smartphone technology, the use of mobile apps for wellness interventions will likely continue to expand to other wellness topics.</p>","PeriodicalId":517889,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"23-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/e4/ahmt-13-23.PMC8835977.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S342811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Despite the purported advantages and potential efficacy of mHealth interventions to promote wellness in children, adolescents, and young adults, it is not clear what areas have been explored and the challenges reported in the biomedical literature.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of publications between 2015 and 2019.

Results: We identified 54 papers that met our inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in 21 countries and ranged in size from six to 9851 participants (median: 184). A total of 41% of studies enrolled adolescents only (n = 19). Of the seven types of mHealth interventions identified, apps were the most common intervention (59%; n = 32) evaluated and 44% of the studies evaluated two or more interventions. The most common topic of the studies reviewed was sexual and reproductive health (24%; n = 13).

Conclusion: Most pediatric mHealth intervention studies are conducted in adolescents in large part, and sexual and reproductive health is the most commonly studied topic. With the easy and widespread accessibility to smartphone technology, the use of mobile apps for wellness interventions will likely continue to expand to other wellness topics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对儿童和青年人群健康和相关挑战的移动健康干预研究范围的系统回顾。
背景:尽管移动健康干预措施在促进儿童、青少年和年轻人健康方面具有据称的优势和潜在功效,但生物医学文献中尚不清楚已经探索了哪些领域以及报告了哪些挑战。方法:我们对2015年至2019年的出版物进行了范围综述。结果:我们确定了54篇符合纳入标准的论文。研究在21个国家进行,参与者人数从6人到9851人不等(中位数:184人)。总共41%的研究只招募了青少年(n = 19)。在确定的七种移动健康干预措施中,应用程序是最常见的干预措施(59%;N = 32)评估,44%的研究评估了两种或两种以上的干预措施。在审查的研究中,最常见的主题是性健康和生殖健康(24%;N = 13)。结论:大多数儿科移动健康干预研究在很大程度上是在青少年中进行的,性和生殖健康是最常见的研究主题。随着智能手机技术的便捷和广泛使用,使用移动应用程序进行健康干预可能会继续扩展到其他健康主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信