New-onset Heart Failure With Atrial Fibrillation: A Distinct Type of Cardiomyopathy?

Q3 Medicine
Journal of atrial fibrillation Pub Date : 2021-04-30 eCollection Date: 2021-04-01 DOI:10.4022/jafib.20200441
Vinay Mehta, Alexander Albers, Maharaj Singh, Ana Cristina Perez Moreno, Timothy E Paterick
{"title":"New-onset Heart Failure With Atrial Fibrillation: A Distinct Type of Cardiomyopathy?","authors":"Vinay Mehta,&nbsp;Alexander Albers,&nbsp;Maharaj Singh,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Perez Moreno,&nbsp;Timothy E Paterick","doi":"10.4022/jafib.20200441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is limited research comparing demographic and clinical characteristics between patients who present with atrial fibrillation (AF) and new-onset cardiomyopathy (CM) to patients with new-onset CM without dysrhythmia. We aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with new-onset CM with and without AF and to report their real-world treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The study population was identified using patient records from our healthcare system from January 1, 2012 to September 30, 2016. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% without a prior history of CM were divided into two groups; those with an antecedent or concomitant diagnosis of AF (AF-CM group) and those with no history of dysrhythmia (CM group). Patients in the AF-CM group (n=196) were older, more likely to be male, had a higher burden of comorbidities but lower levels of cardiac biomarkers, and had lower voltage on surface electrocardiogram than the CM group (n=197). In AF-CM, symptom onset was insidious, leading to a higher likelihood of outpatient diagnosis; 88.3% of AF-CM patients presented with atypical symptoms of AF. The AF-CM group had higher mortality on follow-up. Only 8.7% of patients in this group underwent an ablation procedure. Women, those with a history of coronary artery disease, and older patients were less likely to receive a cardioversion or ablation procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients presenting with new-onset CM associated with AF have a markedly different risk factor and demographic profile, clinical presentation, and outcomes. In real-world practice, a minority of patients undergo a rhythm control strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"13 6","pages":"20200441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691286/pdf/jafib-13-20200441.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.20200441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is limited research comparing demographic and clinical characteristics between patients who present with atrial fibrillation (AF) and new-onset cardiomyopathy (CM) to patients with new-onset CM without dysrhythmia. We aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with new-onset CM with and without AF and to report their real-world treatment.

Methods and results: The study population was identified using patient records from our healthcare system from January 1, 2012 to September 30, 2016. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% without a prior history of CM were divided into two groups; those with an antecedent or concomitant diagnosis of AF (AF-CM group) and those with no history of dysrhythmia (CM group). Patients in the AF-CM group (n=196) were older, more likely to be male, had a higher burden of comorbidities but lower levels of cardiac biomarkers, and had lower voltage on surface electrocardiogram than the CM group (n=197). In AF-CM, symptom onset was insidious, leading to a higher likelihood of outpatient diagnosis; 88.3% of AF-CM patients presented with atypical symptoms of AF. The AF-CM group had higher mortality on follow-up. Only 8.7% of patients in this group underwent an ablation procedure. Women, those with a history of coronary artery disease, and older patients were less likely to receive a cardioversion or ablation procedure.

Conclusions: Patients presenting with new-onset CM associated with AF have a markedly different risk factor and demographic profile, clinical presentation, and outcomes. In real-world practice, a minority of patients undergo a rhythm control strategy.

新发心力衰竭伴心房颤动:一种不同类型的心肌病?
目的:有有限的研究比较房颤(AF)合并新发心肌病(CM)患者与无心律失常的新发心肌病患者的人口学和临床特征。我们的目的是评估伴有和不伴有房颤的新发CM患者的临床特征和结局,并报告他们的现实治疗。方法和结果:研究人群是根据2012年1月1日至2016年9月30日我们医疗保健系统的患者记录确定的。无CM病史的左室射血分数≤40%的患者分为两组;有房颤(AF-CM组)和无心律失常史(CM组)的患者。AF-CM组(n=196)患者年龄较大,男性居多,合并症负担较高,但心脏生物标志物水平较低,表面心电图电压低于CM组(n=197)。在AF-CM中,症状发作隐匿,导致门诊诊断的可能性较高;88.3% AF- cm患者表现为非典型房颤症状,AF- cm组随访死亡率较高。该组中只有8.7%的患者接受了消融手术。女性、有冠状动脉疾病史的患者和老年患者接受心脏复律或消融术的可能性较小。结论:伴有房颤的新发CM患者具有明显不同的危险因素、人口学特征、临床表现和预后。在现实世界的实践中,少数患者接受心律控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of atrial fibrillation
Journal of atrial fibrillation Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信