EBUS versus EUS-B for diagnosing sarcoidosis: The International Sarcoidosis Assessment (ISA) randomized clinical trial.

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1111/resp.14182
Laurence M M Crombag, Kirsten Mooij-Kalverda, Artur Szlubowski, Maciej Gnass, Kurt G Tournoy, Jiayuan Sun, Masahide Oki, Maarten K Ninaber, Daniel P Steinfort, Barton R Jennings, Moishe Liberman, Semra Bilaceroglu, Peter I Bonta, Daniël A Korevaar, Rocco Trisolini, Jouke T Annema
{"title":"EBUS versus EUS-B for diagnosing sarcoidosis: The International Sarcoidosis Assessment (ISA) randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Laurence M M Crombag,&nbsp;Kirsten Mooij-Kalverda,&nbsp;Artur Szlubowski,&nbsp;Maciej Gnass,&nbsp;Kurt G Tournoy,&nbsp;Jiayuan Sun,&nbsp;Masahide Oki,&nbsp;Maarten K Ninaber,&nbsp;Daniel P Steinfort,&nbsp;Barton R Jennings,&nbsp;Moishe Liberman,&nbsp;Semra Bilaceroglu,&nbsp;Peter I Bonta,&nbsp;Daniël A Korevaar,&nbsp;Rocco Trisolini,&nbsp;Jouke T Annema","doi":"10.1111/resp.14182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Endosonography with intrathoracic nodal sampling is proposed as the single test with the highest granuloma detection rate in suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II. However, most studies have been performed in limited geographical regions. Studies suggest that oesophageal endosonographic nodal sampling has higher diagnostic yield than endobronchial endosonographic nodal sampling, but a head-to-head comparison of both routes has never been performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Global (14 hospitals, nine countries, four continents) randomized clinical trial was conducted in consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II presenting between May 2015 and August 2017. Using an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope, patients were randomized to EBUS or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-B-guided nodal sampling, and to 22- or 25-G ProCore needle aspiration (2 × 2 factorial design). Granuloma detection rate was the primary study endpoint. Final diagnosis was based on cytology/pathology outcomes and clinical/radiological follow-up at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 358 patients were randomized: 185 patients to EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and 173 to EUS-B-fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Final diagnosis was sarcoidosis in 306 patients (86%). Granuloma detection rate was 70% (130/185; 95% CI, 63-76) for EBUS-TBNA and 68% (118/173; 95% CI, 61-75) for EUS-B-FNA (p = 0.67). Sensitivity for diagnosing sarcoidosis was 78% (129/165; 95% CI, 71-84) for EBUS-TBNA and 82% (115/141; 95% CI, 74-87) for EUS-B-FNA (p = 0.46). There was no significant difference between the two needle types in granuloma detection rate or sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Granuloma detection rate of mediastinal/hilar nodes by endosonography in patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II is high and similar for EBUS and EUS-B. These findings imply that both diagnostic tests can be safely and universally used in suspected sarcoidosis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":162871,"journal":{"name":"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)","volume":" ","pages":"152-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/b3/RESP-27-152.PMC9299594.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background and objective: Endosonography with intrathoracic nodal sampling is proposed as the single test with the highest granuloma detection rate in suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II. However, most studies have been performed in limited geographical regions. Studies suggest that oesophageal endosonographic nodal sampling has higher diagnostic yield than endobronchial endosonographic nodal sampling, but a head-to-head comparison of both routes has never been performed.

Methods: Global (14 hospitals, nine countries, four continents) randomized clinical trial was conducted in consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II presenting between May 2015 and August 2017. Using an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope, patients were randomized to EBUS or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-B-guided nodal sampling, and to 22- or 25-G ProCore needle aspiration (2 × 2 factorial design). Granuloma detection rate was the primary study endpoint. Final diagnosis was based on cytology/pathology outcomes and clinical/radiological follow-up at 6 months.

Results: A total of 358 patients were randomized: 185 patients to EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and 173 to EUS-B-fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Final diagnosis was sarcoidosis in 306 patients (86%). Granuloma detection rate was 70% (130/185; 95% CI, 63-76) for EBUS-TBNA and 68% (118/173; 95% CI, 61-75) for EUS-B-FNA (p = 0.67). Sensitivity for diagnosing sarcoidosis was 78% (129/165; 95% CI, 71-84) for EBUS-TBNA and 82% (115/141; 95% CI, 74-87) for EUS-B-FNA (p = 0.46). There was no significant difference between the two needle types in granuloma detection rate or sensitivity.

Conclusion: Granuloma detection rate of mediastinal/hilar nodes by endosonography in patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II is high and similar for EBUS and EUS-B. These findings imply that both diagnostic tests can be safely and universally used in suspected sarcoidosis patients.

Abstract Image

EBUS与EUS-B诊断结节病:国际结节病评估(ISA)随机临床试验
背景与目的:在疑似结节病I/II期,超声胸腔内淋巴结取样是肉芽肿检出率最高的单一检查方法。然而,大多数研究都是在有限的地理区域进行的。研究表明,食管超声淋巴结取样比支气管超声淋巴结取样具有更高的诊断率,但从未对两种途径进行过正面比较。方法:对2015年5月至2017年8月期间出现的I/II期疑似结节病患者进行全球(4大洲9个国家14家医院)随机临床试验。使用支气管超声(EBUS)镜,患者被随机分为EBUS或内镜超声(EUS)- b引导的淋巴结取样,以及22或25 g ProCore针抽吸(2 × 2因子设计)。肉芽肿检出率是主要研究终点。最终诊断基于细胞学/病理学结果和6个月的临床/放射学随访。结果:共358例患者被随机分组:经支气管针吸(EBUS-TBNA)组185例,细针吸(FNA)组173例。306例(86%)最终诊断为结节病。肉芽肿检出率为70% (130/185;EBUS-TBNA的95% CI, 63-76), 68% (118/173;EUS-B-FNA的95% CI, 61-75) (p = 0.67)。结节病的诊断敏感性为78% (129/165;EBUS-TBNA的95% CI, 71-84), 82% (115/141;EUS-B-FNA的95% CI, 74-87) (p = 0.46)。两种针型在肉芽肿检出率和敏感性上无显著性差异。结论:疑似结节病I/II期患者纵隔/肝门淋巴结肉芽肿超声检出率高,且EBUS与EUS-B相似。这些发现表明,这两种诊断方法可以安全、普遍地用于疑似结节病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信