Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: New Findings about Consultation Practices.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2021.1996117
Ellen Fox, Marion Danis, Anita J Tarzian, Christopher C Duke
{"title":"Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: New Findings about Consultation Practices.","authors":"Ellen Fox,&nbsp;Marion Danis,&nbsp;Anita J Tarzian,&nbsp;Christopher C Duke","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2021.1996117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>While previous research has examined various aspects of ethics consultation (EC) in U.S. hospitals, certain EC practices have never been systematically studied.<b>Methods</b>To address this gap, we surveyed a random stratified sample of 600 hospitals about aspects of EC that had not been previously explored.<b>Results</b>New findings include: in 26.0% of hospitals, the EC service performs EC for more than one hospital; 72.4% of hospitals performed at least one non-case consultation; in 56% of hospitals, ECs are never requested by patients or families; 59.0% of case consultations involve conflict; the usual practice is to visit the patient in all formal EC cases in 32.5% of hospitals; 56.6% of hospitals do not include a formal meeting in most EC cases; 61.1% of hospitals do not routinely assess ethics consultants' competencies; and 31.6% of hospitals belong to a bioethics network. We estimate the total number of non-case consultations performed in U.S. hospitals to be approximately one half the number of case consultations; we estimate the total number of ECs performed in U.S. hospitals, including both case and non-case consultations, to be just over 100,000 per year.<b>Conclusions</b>These findings expand our current understanding of EC in U.S. hospitals, and raise several concerns that suggest a need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1996117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

BackgroundWhile previous research has examined various aspects of ethics consultation (EC) in U.S. hospitals, certain EC practices have never been systematically studied.MethodsTo address this gap, we surveyed a random stratified sample of 600 hospitals about aspects of EC that had not been previously explored.ResultsNew findings include: in 26.0% of hospitals, the EC service performs EC for more than one hospital; 72.4% of hospitals performed at least one non-case consultation; in 56% of hospitals, ECs are never requested by patients or families; 59.0% of case consultations involve conflict; the usual practice is to visit the patient in all formal EC cases in 32.5% of hospitals; 56.6% of hospitals do not include a formal meeting in most EC cases; 61.1% of hospitals do not routinely assess ethics consultants' competencies; and 31.6% of hospitals belong to a bioethics network. We estimate the total number of non-case consultations performed in U.S. hospitals to be approximately one half the number of case consultations; we estimate the total number of ECs performed in U.S. hospitals, including both case and non-case consultations, to be just over 100,000 per year.ConclusionsThese findings expand our current understanding of EC in U.S. hospitals, and raise several concerns that suggest a need for further research.

美国医院伦理咨询:关于咨询实践的新发现。
虽然以前的研究已经检查了美国医院伦理咨询(EC)的各个方面,但某些EC实践从未被系统地研究过。方法为了解决这一差距,我们对600家医院的随机分层样本进行了调查,了解以前未探索的EC方面。结果新发现:26.0%的医院开展了多家医院的电子商务服务;72.4%的医院至少进行了一次非病例会诊;在56%的医院中,患者或家属从未要求进行急诊检查;59.0%的病例会诊涉及冲突;在32.5%的医院,通常的做法是对所有正式的EC病例进行访问;56.6%的医院在大多数EC病例中不安排正式会议;61.1%的医院没有常规评估伦理顾问的能力;31.6%的医院属于生物伦理网络。我们估计在美国医院进行的非病例咨询的总数约为病例咨询的一半;我们估计,在美国医院进行的ECs总数,包括病例和非病例咨询,每年刚刚超过10万。结论:这些发现扩大了我们目前对美国医院EC的了解,并提出了一些需要进一步研究的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信