Examining privilege and power in US urban parks and open space during the double crises of antiblack racism and COVID-19.

Socio-ecological practice research Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-24 DOI:10.1007/s42532-020-00070-3
Fushcia-Ann Hoover, Theodore C Lim
{"title":"Examining privilege and power in US urban parks and open space during the double crises of antiblack racism and COVID-19.","authors":"Fushcia-Ann Hoover,&nbsp;Theodore C Lim","doi":"10.1007/s42532-020-00070-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this perspective, we argue that creating the positive outcomes socio-ecological researchers and practitioners seek for urban areas requires acknowledging and addressing the interactions of race and systemic racism in parks, open and green spaces. Racial experiences are inseparable from physical landscapes and the processes of designing, managing, or studying them. From COVID-19 to the Black Lives Matter movement and protests, the events of 2020 in the United States underscore how considerations of social justice must extend beyond the conventional distributional focus of environmental justice. It must incorporate an understanding of how the built environment is racialized spatially, but not always readily quantified through the proximity-based measurements frequently used in research and practice. The perspective is organized in three main parts. The first part presents a series of vignettes to frame the ways cities and individuals participate, respond, and interact under COVID-19 with racial segregation as the backdrop. The second part suggests a stepwise approach to building an understanding of racial inequities in socio-ecological systems (SES) research and practice including four entry points: (1) racialized spatial distribution of hazards and amenities, (2) racialized qualities of space, (3) racialized people in space, and (4) racialized creation of space. Finally, the third part proposes actions the SES community can take to enhance our commitment to community recovery, improvement, and thrivability. This perspective cautions practitioners and researchers against opportunistic or quick-fix solutions, and instead challenges our colleagues to be inclusive of disenfranchised voices in shaping socio-ecological goals, now more than ever. The goal of this perspective is to spark engagement with power and privilege in parks and open space using the example of COVID-19 and race in the US.</p>","PeriodicalId":74830,"journal":{"name":"Socio-ecological practice research","volume":"3 1","pages":"55-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42532-020-00070-3","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-ecological practice research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00070-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

In this perspective, we argue that creating the positive outcomes socio-ecological researchers and practitioners seek for urban areas requires acknowledging and addressing the interactions of race and systemic racism in parks, open and green spaces. Racial experiences are inseparable from physical landscapes and the processes of designing, managing, or studying them. From COVID-19 to the Black Lives Matter movement and protests, the events of 2020 in the United States underscore how considerations of social justice must extend beyond the conventional distributional focus of environmental justice. It must incorporate an understanding of how the built environment is racialized spatially, but not always readily quantified through the proximity-based measurements frequently used in research and practice. The perspective is organized in three main parts. The first part presents a series of vignettes to frame the ways cities and individuals participate, respond, and interact under COVID-19 with racial segregation as the backdrop. The second part suggests a stepwise approach to building an understanding of racial inequities in socio-ecological systems (SES) research and practice including four entry points: (1) racialized spatial distribution of hazards and amenities, (2) racialized qualities of space, (3) racialized people in space, and (4) racialized creation of space. Finally, the third part proposes actions the SES community can take to enhance our commitment to community recovery, improvement, and thrivability. This perspective cautions practitioners and researchers against opportunistic or quick-fix solutions, and instead challenges our colleagues to be inclusive of disenfranchised voices in shaping socio-ecological goals, now more than ever. The goal of this perspective is to spark engagement with power and privilege in parks and open space using the example of COVID-19 and race in the US.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在反黑人种族主义和新冠肺炎双重危机中,审视美国城市公园和开放空间的特权和权力。
从这个角度来看,我们认为创造社会生态学研究人员和实践者为城市地区寻求的积极成果需要承认和解决公园、开放和绿色空间中种族和系统性种族主义的相互作用。种族经历与自然景观以及设计、管理或研究它们的过程是分不开的。从2019冠状病毒病到“黑人的命也是命”运动和抗议活动,2020年美国发生的事件突显出,对社会正义的考虑必须超越传统的环境正义分配焦点。它必须包含对建筑环境如何在空间上种族化的理解,但并不总是容易通过研究和实践中经常使用的基于邻近度的测量来量化。透视图由三个主要部分组成。第一部分展示了一系列小插曲,以种族隔离为背景,勾勒出城市和个人在COVID-19下参与、应对和互动的方式。第二部分提出了在社会生态系统(SES)研究和实践中逐步建立对种族不平等的理解的方法,包括四个切入点:(1)危险和便利的种族化空间分布,(2)空间的种族化质量,(3)空间中的种族化人员,(4)空间的种族化创造。最后,第三部分提出了SES社区可以采取的行动,以加强我们对社区恢复,改善和繁荣的承诺。这一观点告诫从业者和研究人员不要投机取机或权宜之计,而是要求我们的同事在塑造社会生态目标时包容被剥夺权利的声音,现在比以往任何时候都更重要。这一视角的目标是以美国的COVID-19和种族为例,在公园和开放空间激发权力和特权的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信