An Observational Study of Disparities in Telemedicine Utilization in Primary Care Patients Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Veronica M Pagán, Katie S McClung, Carol J Peden
{"title":"An Observational Study of Disparities in Telemedicine Utilization in Primary Care Patients Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Veronica M Pagán,&nbsp;Katie S McClung,&nbsp;Carol J Peden","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The rapid scale up of telemedicine due to the COVID-19 pandemic may have disadvantaged patients less able to use technology. <b>Objectives:</b> We tested the hypothesis that certain patient groups may have been disadvantaged in accessing primary care using telemedicine. <b>Design:</b> We compared visit type and patient characteristics for April-May 2019 with April-May 2020 at a large urban academic medical center. Variables of interest included age, gender, race, ethnicity, language, visit type, visit status, insurance type, and zip code to approximate average income. <b>Results</b>: There was a 5% increase in patient visits in the observation period from 2019 to 2020. Care shifted from 100% in person to 83% telemedicine, 60% of which occurred through video and 23% by telephone. In 2020, there was a significant increase in the percentage of older patients, patients of lower income, patients whose preferred language was not English, and patients without commercial insurance who accessed care. For patients who completed a telemedicine visit, racial minority status, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, older age, and non-English language preference significantly increased the likelihood of a telephone visit compared with younger adult, white, non-Hispanic/Latino and English-preference patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> The increase in visits in 2020 and particularly visits by older, non-English preference and lower income patients, demonstrates that the telemedicine scale-up increased access and reached patients regardless of age, language, and income. However, varied usage of televideo and telephone visits for certain groups suggests the need to explore the differences between these modalities to ensure quality telemedicine care for all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1117-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: The rapid scale up of telemedicine due to the COVID-19 pandemic may have disadvantaged patients less able to use technology. Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that certain patient groups may have been disadvantaged in accessing primary care using telemedicine. Design: We compared visit type and patient characteristics for April-May 2019 with April-May 2020 at a large urban academic medical center. Variables of interest included age, gender, race, ethnicity, language, visit type, visit status, insurance type, and zip code to approximate average income. Results: There was a 5% increase in patient visits in the observation period from 2019 to 2020. Care shifted from 100% in person to 83% telemedicine, 60% of which occurred through video and 23% by telephone. In 2020, there was a significant increase in the percentage of older patients, patients of lower income, patients whose preferred language was not English, and patients without commercial insurance who accessed care. For patients who completed a telemedicine visit, racial minority status, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, older age, and non-English language preference significantly increased the likelihood of a telephone visit compared with younger adult, white, non-Hispanic/Latino and English-preference patients. Conclusions: The increase in visits in 2020 and particularly visits by older, non-English preference and lower income patients, demonstrates that the telemedicine scale-up increased access and reached patients regardless of age, language, and income. However, varied usage of televideo and telephone visits for certain groups suggests the need to explore the differences between these modalities to ensure quality telemedicine care for all patients.

COVID-19大流行前后基层保健患者远程医疗利用差异的观察性研究
背景:由于COVID-19大流行,远程医疗的迅速扩大可能会使弱势患者无法使用技术。目的:我们检验了一种假设,即某些患者群体可能在使用远程医疗获得初级保健方面处于不利地位。设计:我们比较了2019年4月至5月与2020年4月至5月在大型城市学术医疗中心的就诊类型和患者特征。感兴趣的变量包括年龄、性别、种族、民族、语言、访问类型、访问状态、保险类型和邮政编码,以近似平均收入。结果:在2019 - 2020年的观察期内,患者访问量增加了5%。护理从100%的亲自护理转变为83%的远程医疗,其中60%通过视频进行,23%通过电话进行。2020年,获得医疗服务的老年患者、低收入患者、首选语言不是英语的患者和没有商业保险的患者的比例显著增加。对于完成远程医疗就诊的患者,与年轻人、白人、非西班牙裔/拉丁裔和英语偏好的患者相比,少数种族、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、年龄较大和非英语语言偏好的患者进行电话就诊的可能性显著增加。结论:2020年的访问量增加,特别是老年人、非英语偏好和低收入患者的访问量增加,表明远程医疗的扩大增加了可及性,并覆盖了年龄、语言和收入不同的患者。然而,某些群体对电视和电话访问的不同使用表明,有必要探索这些模式之间的差异,以确保所有患者获得高质量的远程医疗护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信