Multi-institutional intervention to improve patient perception of physician empathy in emergency care.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-21 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-210757
Katie Pettit, Anne Messman, Nathaniel Scott, Michael Puskarich, Hao Wang, Naomi Alanis, Erin Dehon, Sara Konrath, Robert D Welch, Jeffrey Kline
{"title":"Multi-institutional intervention to improve patient perception of physician empathy in emergency care.","authors":"Katie Pettit,&nbsp;Anne Messman,&nbsp;Nathaniel Scott,&nbsp;Michael Puskarich,&nbsp;Hao Wang,&nbsp;Naomi Alanis,&nbsp;Erin Dehon,&nbsp;Sara Konrath,&nbsp;Robert D Welch,&nbsp;Jeffrey Kline","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2020-210757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician empathy has been linked to increased patient satisfaction, improved patient outcomes and reduced provider burnout. Our objective was to test the effectiveness of an educational intervention to improve physician empathy and trust in the ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Physician participants from six emergency medicine residencies in the US were studied from 2018 to 2019 using a pre-post, quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design with randomisation at the site level. Intervention participants at three hospitals received an educational intervention, guided by acognitivemap (the 'empathy circle'). This intervention was further emphasised by the use of motivational texts delivered to participants throughout the course of the study. The primary outcome was change in E patient perception of resident empathy (Jefferson scale of patient perception of physician empathy (JSPPPE) and Trust in Physicians Scale (Tips)) before (T1) and 3-6 months later (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected for 221 residents (postgraduate year 1-4.) In controls, the mean (SD) JSPPPE scores at T1 and T2 were 29 (3.8) and 29 (4.0), respectively (mean difference 0.8, 95% CI: -0.7 to 2.4, p=0.20, paired t-test). In the intervention group, the JSPPPE scores at T1 and T2 were 28 (4.4) and 30 (4.0), respectively (mean difference 1.4, 95% CI: 0.0 to 2.8, p=0.08). In controls, the TIPS at T1 was 65 (6.3) and T2 was 66 (5.8) (mean difference -0.1, 95% CI: -3.8 to 3.6, p=0.35). In the intervention group, the TIPS at T1 was 63 (6.9) and T2 was 66 (6.3) (mean difference 2.4, 95% CI: 0.2 to 4.5, p=0.007). Hierarchical regression revealed no effect of time×group interaction for JSPPPE (p=0.71) nor TIPS (p=0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An educational intervention with the addition of text reminders designed to increase empathic behaviour was not associated with a change in patient-perceived empathy, but was associated with a modest improvement in trust in physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":" ","pages":"420-426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-210757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Physician empathy has been linked to increased patient satisfaction, improved patient outcomes and reduced provider burnout. Our objective was to test the effectiveness of an educational intervention to improve physician empathy and trust in the ED setting.

Methods: Physician participants from six emergency medicine residencies in the US were studied from 2018 to 2019 using a pre-post, quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design with randomisation at the site level. Intervention participants at three hospitals received an educational intervention, guided by acognitivemap (the 'empathy circle'). This intervention was further emphasised by the use of motivational texts delivered to participants throughout the course of the study. The primary outcome was change in E patient perception of resident empathy (Jefferson scale of patient perception of physician empathy (JSPPPE) and Trust in Physicians Scale (Tips)) before (T1) and 3-6 months later (T2).

Results: Data were collected for 221 residents (postgraduate year 1-4.) In controls, the mean (SD) JSPPPE scores at T1 and T2 were 29 (3.8) and 29 (4.0), respectively (mean difference 0.8, 95% CI: -0.7 to 2.4, p=0.20, paired t-test). In the intervention group, the JSPPPE scores at T1 and T2 were 28 (4.4) and 30 (4.0), respectively (mean difference 1.4, 95% CI: 0.0 to 2.8, p=0.08). In controls, the TIPS at T1 was 65 (6.3) and T2 was 66 (5.8) (mean difference -0.1, 95% CI: -3.8 to 3.6, p=0.35). In the intervention group, the TIPS at T1 was 63 (6.9) and T2 was 66 (6.3) (mean difference 2.4, 95% CI: 0.2 to 4.5, p=0.007). Hierarchical regression revealed no effect of time×group interaction for JSPPPE (p=0.71) nor TIPS (p=0.16).

Conclusion: An educational intervention with the addition of text reminders designed to increase empathic behaviour was not associated with a change in patient-perceived empathy, but was associated with a modest improvement in trust in physicians.

多机构干预提高急诊护理中患者对医生共情的感知。
背景:医生共情与提高患者满意度、改善患者预后和减少医生倦怠有关。我们的目的是测试教育干预的有效性,以提高医生在急诊科的同理心和信任。方法:2018年至2019年,采用现场随机化的前后准实验非等效对照组设计,对美国6个急诊住院医师进行研究。三家医院的干预参与者接受了由认知地图(“共情圈”)指导的教育干预。通过在整个研究过程中向参与者提供激励性文本,进一步强调了这种干预。主要观察结果为住院医师共情感知(杰弗逊医生共情感知量表(JSPPPE)和医生信任量表(Tips))在治疗前(T1)和治疗后3-6个月(T2)的变化。结果:收集了221名居民(研究生1-4年级)的数据。在对照组中,T1和T2时JSPPPE评分的平均(SD)分别为29(3.8)和29(4.0)(平均差值0.8,95% CI: -0.7 ~ 2.4, p=0.20,配对t检验)。干预组T1、T2时JSPPPE评分分别为28分(4.4分)、30分(4.0分)(平均差异1.4,95% CI: 0.0 ~ 2.8, p=0.08)。在对照组中,T1时的TIPS为65 (6.3),T2时的TIPS为66(5.8)(平均差异为-0.1,95% CI: -3.8 ~ 3.6, p=0.35)。干预组T1时TIPS为63 (6.9),T2时TIPS为66(6.3)(平均差异2.4,95% CI: 0.2 ~ 4.5, p=0.007)。层次回归显示time×group交互作用对JSPPPE (p=0.71)和TIPS (p=0.16)没有影响。结论:通过增加文本提醒来增加移情行为的教育干预与患者感知移情的变化无关,但与对医生信任的适度改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信