A review of socioeconomic factors associated with acute myocardial infarction-related mortality and hospital readmissions.

Q2 Medicine
Hospital practice (1995) Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1080/21548331.2021.2022357
Mercy Buckman, Amanda Grant, Sally Henson, Julia Ribeiro, Katie Roth, Derek Stranton, Michael Korvink, Laura H Gunn
{"title":"A review of socioeconomic factors associated with acute myocardial infarction-related mortality and hospital readmissions.","authors":"Mercy Buckman,&nbsp;Amanda Grant,&nbsp;Sally Henson,&nbsp;Julia Ribeiro,&nbsp;Katie Roth,&nbsp;Derek Stranton,&nbsp;Michael Korvink,&nbsp;Laura H Gunn","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2021.2022357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk-adjustment models are widely used methodological approaches within the healthcare industry to measure hospital performance and quality of care. However, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) do not fully adjust for socioeconomic status (SES) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) models. A review and evidence synthesis was conducted to identify associations of SES factors with hospital readmission and mortality in AMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple electronic databases were queried to identify studies assessing risk for AMI-related mortality or hospital readmissions and SES factors. Identified studies were screened by title and abstract. Full-text reviews followed for articles meeting the inclusion criteria, including quality assessments. Data were extracted from all included studies, and evidence synthesis was performed to identify associations between SES factors and outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included in the review. One study showed that Black patients had higher AMI-related readmission rates compared to White patients (mean difference 4.3% [SD 1.4%], p < 0.001). Another study showed that income inequality was associated with increased risk of AMI-related readmissions (RR 1.18 [95% CI], 1.13-1.23). One study found that unemployed individuals experienced significantly greater rates of AMI-related mortality than those working full-time (HR 2.08, 1.51-2.87). According to another study, lack of health insurance was associated with worse rates for in-hospital AMI-related mortality (OR 1.77, 1.72-1.82). Based on one study, AMI-related mortality was higher in those with <8 years of education compared to those with >16 years (17.5% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.0001). Five of six studies found a significant association between ZIP code/neighborhood/location and AMI-related readmission or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Race, ZIP code/neighborhood/location, insurance status, income/poverty, and education comprise SES factors found to be associated with AMI-related mortality and/or readmission outcomes. Including these SES factors in future updates of CMS's risk-adjusted models has the potential to provide more appropriate compensation mechanisms to hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2021.2022357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Risk-adjustment models are widely used methodological approaches within the healthcare industry to measure hospital performance and quality of care. However, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) do not fully adjust for socioeconomic status (SES) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) models. A review and evidence synthesis was conducted to identify associations of SES factors with hospital readmission and mortality in AMI patients.

Methods: Multiple electronic databases were queried to identify studies assessing risk for AMI-related mortality or hospital readmissions and SES factors. Identified studies were screened by title and abstract. Full-text reviews followed for articles meeting the inclusion criteria, including quality assessments. Data were extracted from all included studies, and evidence synthesis was performed to identify associations between SES factors and outcome variables.

Results: Ten studies were included in the review. One study showed that Black patients had higher AMI-related readmission rates compared to White patients (mean difference 4.3% [SD 1.4%], p < 0.001). Another study showed that income inequality was associated with increased risk of AMI-related readmissions (RR 1.18 [95% CI], 1.13-1.23). One study found that unemployed individuals experienced significantly greater rates of AMI-related mortality than those working full-time (HR 2.08, 1.51-2.87). According to another study, lack of health insurance was associated with worse rates for in-hospital AMI-related mortality (OR 1.77, 1.72-1.82). Based on one study, AMI-related mortality was higher in those with <8 years of education compared to those with >16 years (17.5% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.0001). Five of six studies found a significant association between ZIP code/neighborhood/location and AMI-related readmission or mortality.

Conclusion: Race, ZIP code/neighborhood/location, insurance status, income/poverty, and education comprise SES factors found to be associated with AMI-related mortality and/or readmission outcomes. Including these SES factors in future updates of CMS's risk-adjusted models has the potential to provide more appropriate compensation mechanisms to hospitals.

与急性心肌梗死相关死亡率和再入院率相关的社会经济因素综述
背景:风险调整模型是在医疗保健行业中广泛使用的方法方法,用于衡量医院的绩效和护理质量。然而,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)在急性心肌梗死(AMI)模型中并没有完全调整社会经济地位(SES)。我们进行了一项综述和证据综合,以确定SES因素与AMI患者再入院和死亡率的关系。方法:对多个电子数据库进行查询,以确定评估ami相关死亡率或再入院风险和SES因素的研究。通过题目和摘要筛选已确定的研究。随后对符合纳入标准的文章进行全文审查,包括质量评估。从所有纳入的研究中提取数据,并进行证据综合以确定SES因素与结果变量之间的关联。结果:纳入10项研究。一项研究表明,与白人患者相比,黑人患者与ami相关的再入院率更高(平均差异为4.3% [SD 1.4%], p 16年(17.5% vs. 3.5%), p结论:种族、邮政编码/社区/位置、保险状况、收入/贫困和教育程度构成与ami相关死亡率和/或再入院结果相关的SES因素。在CMS风险调整模型的未来更新中包括这些SES因素有可能为医院提供更合适的补偿机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信