Catheter Ablation for Hospitalized Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Reduced Systolic Function: Analysis of Inpatient Mortality, Resource Utilization and Complications.
Muhammad Bilal Munir, Muhammad Zia Khan, Pratik Agrawal, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Moinuddin Syed, Kinjan Patel, BilYasir Abdul Ghaffarlal, Muhammad U Khan, Safi U Khan, Sudarshan Balla, Jonathan C Hsu
{"title":"Catheter Ablation for Hospitalized Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Reduced Systolic Function: Analysis of Inpatient Mortality, Resource Utilization and Complications.","authors":"Muhammad Bilal Munir, Muhammad Zia Khan, Pratik Agrawal, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Moinuddin Syed, Kinjan Patel, BilYasir Abdul Ghaffarlal, Muhammad U Khan, Safi U Khan, Sudarshan Balla, Jonathan C Hsu","doi":"10.4022/jafib.2480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized trials have shown improvement in hard clinical end points when catheter ablation (CA) is employed as a management strategy for certain atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Limited data, however, exist in this realm outside the controlled clinical trial settings. We sought to determine real-world data on mortality and complications after utilization of CA in such patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data were derived from National Inpatient Sample from January 2008 to August 2015. Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared among HFrEF and AF patients undergoing CA or not. Propensity matching was done to mitigate selection bias and balance confounding variables. Various CA related complications were assessed. Logistic regression was done to determine predictors of mortality in our study cohort. A total of 2,569,919 patients were analyzed and a total of 7773 patients underwent CA. Mortality was significantly better in CA group in both unmatched (1.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.01) and propensity matched cohorts (1.2% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.01). Overall complication rate was 10.2% in CA cohort and primarily driven by cardiac and neurological etiologies. In regression analysis, CA remained a strong predictor of reduced mortality (OR 0.301, 95% CI 0.184-0.494).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CA is associated with improved mortality in admitted AF patients with concomitant HFrEF. Overall complication rate after CA was modest at 10.2%. Consideration can be given to the utilization of this therapeutic modality in hospitalized AF patients with concomitant HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":" ","pages":"2480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691359/pdf/jafib-13-02480.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.2480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Randomized trials have shown improvement in hard clinical end points when catheter ablation (CA) is employed as a management strategy for certain atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Limited data, however, exist in this realm outside the controlled clinical trial settings. We sought to determine real-world data on mortality and complications after utilization of CA in such patients.
Methods and results: Data were derived from National Inpatient Sample from January 2008 to August 2015. Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared among HFrEF and AF patients undergoing CA or not. Propensity matching was done to mitigate selection bias and balance confounding variables. Various CA related complications were assessed. Logistic regression was done to determine predictors of mortality in our study cohort. A total of 2,569,919 patients were analyzed and a total of 7773 patients underwent CA. Mortality was significantly better in CA group in both unmatched (1.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.01) and propensity matched cohorts (1.2% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.01). Overall complication rate was 10.2% in CA cohort and primarily driven by cardiac and neurological etiologies. In regression analysis, CA remained a strong predictor of reduced mortality (OR 0.301, 95% CI 0.184-0.494).
Conclusions: CA is associated with improved mortality in admitted AF patients with concomitant HFrEF. Overall complication rate after CA was modest at 10.2%. Consideration can be given to the utilization of this therapeutic modality in hospitalized AF patients with concomitant HFrEF.
背景:随机试验表明,导管消融(CA)作为某些心房颤动(AF)患者心力衰竭和射血分数降低(HFrEF)的治疗策略,可以改善硬临床终点。然而,在对照临床试验设置之外,这一领域的数据有限。我们试图确定这些患者使用CA后死亡率和并发症的真实数据。方法与结果:数据来源于2008年1月至2015年8月的全国住院患者样本。使用《国际疾病分类,第九次修订,临床修改》(ICD-9-CM)代码对患者进行鉴定。比较HFrEF和房颤患者接受或不接受CA的基线特征和结果。倾向匹配是为了减轻选择偏差和平衡混杂变量。评估各种CA相关并发症。在我们的研究队列中进行了逻辑回归来确定死亡率的预测因素。共分析了2569919例患者,其中7773例患者接受了CA。在未匹配组(1.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.01)和倾向匹配组(1.2% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.01)中,CA组的死亡率都明显更好。CA队列的总并发症发生率为10.2%,主要由心脏和神经病因驱动。在回归分析中,CA仍然是降低死亡率的强预测因子(OR 0.301, 95% CI 0.184-0.494)。结论:CA与合并HFrEF的房颤患者死亡率的提高相关。CA后的总并发症发生率为10.2%。可以考虑在住院房颤合并HFrEF患者中使用这种治疗方式。