Same-Day Versus Next-Day Discharge Strategies for Left Atrial Ablation Procedures: A Parallel, Intra-Institutional Comparison of Safety and Feasibility.

Q3 Medicine
Journal of atrial fibrillation Pub Date : 2021-02-28 eCollection Date: 2021-02-01 DOI:10.4022/jafib.2466
Matthew T Brown, Mary M Pelling, Soroosh Kiani, Faisal M Merchant, Mikhael F El-Chami, Angel R Leon, Stacy Westerman, Anand Shah, Donna Wise, Michael S Lloyd
{"title":"Same-Day Versus Next-Day Discharge Strategies for Left Atrial Ablation Procedures: A Parallel, Intra-Institutional Comparison of Safety and Feasibility.","authors":"Matthew T Brown,&nbsp;Mary M Pelling,&nbsp;Soroosh Kiani,&nbsp;Faisal M Merchant,&nbsp;Mikhael F El-Chami,&nbsp;Angel R Leon,&nbsp;Stacy Westerman,&nbsp;Anand Shah,&nbsp;Donna Wise,&nbsp;Michael S Lloyd","doi":"10.4022/jafib.2466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Head-to-head comparative data for the postoperative care of patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to investigate complication and readmission rates between patients undergoing same-day (SD) or next-day (ND) discharges for ablative procedures in the left atrium, primarily atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two electrophysiology centers simultaneously perform left atrial ablations with differing discharge strategies. We identified all patients who underwent left atrial ablation from August 2017 to August 2019 (n = 409) undergoing either SD (n = 210) or ND (n = 199) discharge protocols. We analyzed any clinical events that resulted in procedural abortion, extended hospitalization, or readmission within 72 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint of complication and readmission rate was similar between SD and ND discharge (14.3% vs 12.6%, p = 0.665). Rates of complications categorized as major (2.4% vs 3.0%, p = 0. 776) and minor (11.9% vs 9.5%, p = 0.524) were also similar.Multivariable regression modeling revealed no significant correlation between discharge strategy and complication/readmission occurrence (OR 1.565 [0.754 - 3.248], p = 0.23), but a positive association of hypertension and procedure duration (OR 3.428 [1.436 - 8.184], p = 0.006) and (OR 1.01 [1 - 1.019], p = 0.046) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Left atrial ablation complication and readmission rates were similar between SD and ND discharge practices. Hypertension and procedural duration were associated with increased complication rates irrespective of discharge strategy. These data, which represent the first side-by-side comparison of discharge strategy, suggests same-day discharge is safe and feasible for left atrial ablation procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":" ","pages":"2466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691351/pdf/jafib-13-02466.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.2466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Head-to-head comparative data for the postoperative care of patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures are lacking.

Objective: We sought to investigate complication and readmission rates between patients undergoing same-day (SD) or next-day (ND) discharges for ablative procedures in the left atrium, primarily atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: Two electrophysiology centers simultaneously perform left atrial ablations with differing discharge strategies. We identified all patients who underwent left atrial ablation from August 2017 to August 2019 (n = 409) undergoing either SD (n = 210) or ND (n = 199) discharge protocols. We analyzed any clinical events that resulted in procedural abortion, extended hospitalization, or readmission within 72 hours.

Results: The primary endpoint of complication and readmission rate was similar between SD and ND discharge (14.3% vs 12.6%, p = 0.665). Rates of complications categorized as major (2.4% vs 3.0%, p = 0. 776) and minor (11.9% vs 9.5%, p = 0.524) were also similar.Multivariable regression modeling revealed no significant correlation between discharge strategy and complication/readmission occurrence (OR 1.565 [0.754 - 3.248], p = 0.23), but a positive association of hypertension and procedure duration (OR 3.428 [1.436 - 8.184], p = 0.006) and (OR 1.01 [1 - 1.019], p = 0.046) respectively.

Conclusions: Left atrial ablation complication and readmission rates were similar between SD and ND discharge practices. Hypertension and procedural duration were associated with increased complication rates irrespective of discharge strategy. These data, which represent the first side-by-side comparison of discharge strategy, suggests same-day discharge is safe and feasible for left atrial ablation procedures.

当日与次日出院策略左房消融手术:平行,机构内的安全性和可行性比较。
背景:目前缺乏左房消融患者术后护理的首尾对比数据。目的:我们试图调查当日(SD)或次日(ND)出院的左心房消融手术患者的并发症和再入院率,主要是心房颤动(AF)。方法:两个电生理中心采用不同的放电策略同时进行左房消融。我们确定了2017年8月至2019年8月期间接受左房消融的所有患者(n = 409),采用SD (n = 210)或ND (n = 199)出院方案。我们分析了任何导致手术流产、延长住院时间或在72小时内再入院的临床事件。结果:SD组和ND组的主要并发症终点和再入院率相似(14.3% vs 12.6%, p = 0.665)。严重并发症发生率(2.4% vs 3.0%, p = 0。776)和次要(11.9% vs 9.5%, p = 0.524)也相似。多变量回归模型显示,出院策略与并发症/再入院发生率无显著相关性(OR 1.565 [0.754 - 3.248], p = 0.23),而高血压与手术时间呈正相关(OR 3.428 [1.436 - 8.184], p = 0.006)和(OR 1.01 [1 - 1.019], p = 0.046)。结论:左房消融并发症和再入院率在SD和ND出院实践中相似。无论出院策略如何,高血压和手术时间与并发症发生率增加有关。这些数据代表了出院策略的首次并排比较,表明当天出院对于左房消融手术是安全可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of atrial fibrillation
Journal of atrial fibrillation Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信