The Use of qSOFA, SOFA, and Ramathibodi Early Warning Score (REWS) to Predict Severe Complications in Hematologic Malignancy Patients.

Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM Pub Date : 2022-02-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S345308
Pungkava Sricharoen, Chaithawat Chueluecha, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong
{"title":"The Use of qSOFA, SOFA, and Ramathibodi Early Warning Score (REWS) to Predict Severe Complications in Hematologic Malignancy Patients.","authors":"Pungkava Sricharoen,&nbsp;Chaithawat Chueluecha,&nbsp;Chaiyaporn Yuksen,&nbsp;Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S345308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis causes high mortality in vulnerable groups such as hematologic malignancy (HM) patients. There are various early warning scores of sepsis, eg, qSOFA, SOFA, and Ramathibodi Early Warning Score (REWS). This study aimed to compare REWS, qSOFA, and SOFA in predicting severe complications in hematologic malignancy patients visiting ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted as a retrospective cohort study at the ED of Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Adult HM patients suspected of sepsis and have visited ED between March 2016 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 124 patients in our cohort, 51 (41%) had serious complication in ED and 20 (16%) died within 28 days after admission. The AUROCs of SOFA and qSOFA indicate significantly higher predicting in serious complication in ED than REWS (SOFA, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73-0.89], qSOFA, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.65-0.81], REWS, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.52-0.72] p=0.004) while the predicting in 28-day mortality is not statistically significantly different (SOFA, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.60-0.85], qSOFA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.80], REWS, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44-0.75] p=0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SOFA score is highest in predicting severe complications among hematologic malignancy patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":" ","pages":"51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/49/oaem-14-51.PMC8827160.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S345308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis causes high mortality in vulnerable groups such as hematologic malignancy (HM) patients. There are various early warning scores of sepsis, eg, qSOFA, SOFA, and Ramathibodi Early Warning Score (REWS). This study aimed to compare REWS, qSOFA, and SOFA in predicting severe complications in hematologic malignancy patients visiting ED.

Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective cohort study at the ED of Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Adult HM patients suspected of sepsis and have visited ED between March 2016 and December 2019.

Results: Among 124 patients in our cohort, 51 (41%) had serious complication in ED and 20 (16%) died within 28 days after admission. The AUROCs of SOFA and qSOFA indicate significantly higher predicting in serious complication in ED than REWS (SOFA, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73-0.89], qSOFA, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.65-0.81], REWS, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.52-0.72] p=0.004) while the predicting in 28-day mortality is not statistically significantly different (SOFA, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.60-0.85], qSOFA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.80], REWS, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44-0.75] p=0.25).

Conclusion: The SOFA score is highest in predicting severe complications among hematologic malignancy patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

应用qSOFA、SOFA和Ramathibodi早期预警评分(REWS)预测血液病恶性患者的严重并发症
背景:败血症在血液恶性肿瘤(HM)患者等易感人群中引起高死亡率。脓毒症有多种早期预警评分,如qSOFA、SOFA和Ramathibodi早期预警评分(REWS)。本研究旨在比较REWS、qSOFA和SOFA在预测血液恶性肿瘤急诊科患者严重并发症方面的作用。方法:该研究是在泰国曼谷Ramathibodi医院急诊科进行的回顾性队列研究。疑似脓毒症并于2016年3月至2019年12月期间就诊于急诊科的成年HM患者。结果:124例患者中,51例(41%)有严重的ED并发症,20例(16%)在入院后28天内死亡。SOFA和qSOFA的auroc对ED严重并发症的预测明显高于REWS (SOFA, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73-0.89], qSOFA, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.65-0.81], REWS, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.52-0.72] p=0.004),而对28天死亡率的预测差异无统计学意义(SOFA, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.60-0.85], qSOFA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.80], REWS, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44-0.75] p=0.25)。结论:SOFA评分是预测恶性血液病患者严重并发症的最高评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信