{"title":"[Hemitrapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb].","authors":"A Zach, S Dikou, G Wassilew, M Lautenbach","doi":"10.1007/s00132-021-04193-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemiresection arthoplasty or partial trapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb is a surgical option in stages 1-3 according to Eaton-Littler classification. Preservation of the intact scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint and maintenance of the length of the thumb is the advantage of this technique.</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>Technically, partial trapeziectomy is only slightly more complex compared to trapeziectomy with or without suspension. An interposition of autologous or allogeneic material is recommended; suspension arthroplasty is also possible in almost all common variants. Despite these theoretical advantages, this technique has not proven advantageous in practice, neither in terms of function nor in terms of time, compared to other techniques. The great advantage of partial trapeziectomy, however, is the wide range of options for revision surgery in the case of persistent complaints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of proximalization of the thumb due to an inadequate interposition is generally minor and is usually caused by implant sintering. This can easily be compensated for by implanting a larger graft. Persistent instabilities are the most common cause of persistence of symptoms and can usually be remedied by autologous or allogeneic suspension arthroplasty. In addition, the entire range of endoprosthetics is also possible with a previous spare resection of the trapezium and the possibility of a complete trapeziectomy remains in any case. The obvious theoretical advantages of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy need to be confirmed in practice in future.</p>","PeriodicalId":54669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopade","volume":"51 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopade","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04193-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hemiresection arthoplasty or partial trapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb is a surgical option in stages 1-3 according to Eaton-Littler classification. Preservation of the intact scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint and maintenance of the length of the thumb is the advantage of this technique.
Technique: Technically, partial trapeziectomy is only slightly more complex compared to trapeziectomy with or without suspension. An interposition of autologous or allogeneic material is recommended; suspension arthroplasty is also possible in almost all common variants. Despite these theoretical advantages, this technique has not proven advantageous in practice, neither in terms of function nor in terms of time, compared to other techniques. The great advantage of partial trapeziectomy, however, is the wide range of options for revision surgery in the case of persistent complaints.
Results: The risk of proximalization of the thumb due to an inadequate interposition is generally minor and is usually caused by implant sintering. This can easily be compensated for by implanting a larger graft. Persistent instabilities are the most common cause of persistence of symptoms and can usually be remedied by autologous or allogeneic suspension arthroplasty. In addition, the entire range of endoprosthetics is also possible with a previous spare resection of the trapezium and the possibility of a complete trapeziectomy remains in any case. The obvious theoretical advantages of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy need to be confirmed in practice in future.
期刊介绍:
Der Orthopäde is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of orthopaedics and its neighboring areas. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of orthopaedists.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange.
Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.