[Atrial fibrillation and the limits of oral anticoagulation: for whom are left atrial appendage occluders suitable?]

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Internist Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s00108-021-01206-7
Sebastian Feickert, Niels Christian Ewertsen, Giuseppe D'Ancona, Alper Öner, Hüseyin Ince, Jasmin Ortak
{"title":"[Atrial fibrillation and the limits of oral anticoagulation: for whom are left atrial appendage occluders suitable?]","authors":"Sebastian Feickert,&nbsp;Niels Christian Ewertsen,&nbsp;Giuseppe D'Ancona,&nbsp;Alper Öner,&nbsp;Hüseyin Ince,&nbsp;Jasmin Ortak","doi":"10.1007/s00108-021-01206-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation are at a significantly increased risk of thromboembolic events, especially ischemic strokes. Oral anticoagulation reduces this risk, but cannot be used in some patients for various reasons and is associated with a relevantly increased risk of bleeding. As an alternative for prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation, there are different options of left atrial appendage closure.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This article explains the possibilities of interventional atrial occlusion as well as the suitable patient clientele using an overview of the currently available systems for atrial occlusion, a guideline for patient selection and a summary of the current scientific data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and available scientific data: </strong>In carefully selected patients suffering from atrial fibrillation with relative or absolute contraindications for oral anticoagulation, interventional closure of the atrial appendage is a safe alternative for prophylaxis against thromboembolic events. The currently available scientific evidence from randomized controlled trials is sparse. Nevertheless, extensive amounts of registry study data suggest a benefit, while the results of several large randomized controlled trials are expected in the coming years.</p>","PeriodicalId":54924,"journal":{"name":"Internist","volume":"63 2","pages":"230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-021-01206-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation are at a significantly increased risk of thromboembolic events, especially ischemic strokes. Oral anticoagulation reduces this risk, but cannot be used in some patients for various reasons and is associated with a relevantly increased risk of bleeding. As an alternative for prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation, there are different options of left atrial appendage closure.

Aim: This article explains the possibilities of interventional atrial occlusion as well as the suitable patient clientele using an overview of the currently available systems for atrial occlusion, a guideline for patient selection and a summary of the current scientific data.

Conclusion and available scientific data: In carefully selected patients suffering from atrial fibrillation with relative or absolute contraindications for oral anticoagulation, interventional closure of the atrial appendage is a safe alternative for prophylaxis against thromboembolic events. The currently available scientific evidence from randomized controlled trials is sparse. Nevertheless, extensive amounts of registry study data suggest a benefit, while the results of several large randomized controlled trials are expected in the coming years.

心房颤动与口服抗凝的限度:左心房附件封堵器适合于谁?]
背景:房颤患者发生血栓栓塞事件的风险显著增加,尤其是缺血性中风。口服抗凝可降低这种风险,但由于各种原因不能用于某些患者,并且与出血风险增加相关。作为预防心房颤动患者血栓栓塞事件的一种替代方法,左心房附件关闭术有不同的选择。目的:本文通过对目前可用的心房闭塞系统的概述、患者选择指南和当前科学数据的总结,解释介入性心房闭塞的可能性以及合适的患者客户。结论和现有的科学数据:在精心挑选的有相对或绝对口服抗凝禁忌症的房颤患者中,介入关闭心房附件是预防血栓栓塞事件的安全选择。目前从随机对照试验中获得的科学证据很少。尽管如此,大量的注册研究数据表明有益处,而几项大型随机对照试验的结果预计将在未来几年内公布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internist
Internist 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Internist is an internationally respected journal dealing with all aspects of internal medicine. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of internists working in practical or clinical environments as well as of general practitioners who are particularly interested in internal medicine. The focus is on the topics of prevention, diagnostic approaches, management of complications, and current therapy strategies. Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信