Patients with questionable penicillin (beta-lactam) allergy: Causes and solutions.

Allergologie Select Pub Date : 2022-02-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5414/ALX02310E
Knut Brockow, Gerda Wurpts, Axel Trautmann
{"title":"Patients with questionable penicillin (beta-lactam) allergy: Causes and solutions.","authors":"Knut Brockow, Gerda Wurpts, Axel Trautmann","doi":"10.5414/ALX02310E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Europe, North America, and Australia, 5% to 10% of the population are now classified as penicillin (β-lactam) allergic. Only ~ 10% of these questionable diagnoses, mostly made in childhood, can be confirmed by allergy diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The aim of this review is to show causes and consequences as well as recommendations for dealing with the often questionable diagnosis of penicillin (β-lactam) allergy (BLA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An incorrect BLA diagnosis may negatively impact antibiotic treatment needed in the future, by using a less effective antibiotic or using a broad-spectrum antibiotic, for example, further exacerbating the problem of increasing antibiotic resistance. Accordingly, there is growing pressure from antibiotic stewardship programs to critically challenge the BLA diagnosis. Conservatively, a suspected BLA is reviewed by an allergist using medical history, skin testing, laboratory testing, and provocation. This clarification is costly and is not remunerated in the German health care system; that is the reason why this testing is only offered in a few specialized clinics and practically not at all in general practice. In view of thousands of affected patients, additional strategies are needed to treat patients with a low risk of hypersensitivity reaction despite suspected allergy with a β-lactam antibiotic. In recent years, various methods have been proposed to eliminate suspected allergy as promptly as possible and directly before necessary treatment with a β-lactam antibiotic, including standardized history (also in the form of an algorithm), skin test with immediate reading after 15 minutes, or administration of a small test dose. Investigations of small case series and also multi-center studies to date have yielded promising results in terms of feasibility and safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the large number of patients with (questionable) BLA, most have never been tested and - if antibiotic treatment becomes necessary - simply receive an alternative antibiotic. The diagnosis of BLA therefore requires new approaches besides classical allergy testing to critically question BLA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7485,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie Select","volume":" ","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie Select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02310E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Europe, North America, and Australia, 5% to 10% of the population are now classified as penicillin (β-lactam) allergic. Only ~ 10% of these questionable diagnoses, mostly made in childhood, can be confirmed by allergy diagnostics.

Materials and methods: The aim of this review is to show causes and consequences as well as recommendations for dealing with the often questionable diagnosis of penicillin (β-lactam) allergy (BLA).

Results: An incorrect BLA diagnosis may negatively impact antibiotic treatment needed in the future, by using a less effective antibiotic or using a broad-spectrum antibiotic, for example, further exacerbating the problem of increasing antibiotic resistance. Accordingly, there is growing pressure from antibiotic stewardship programs to critically challenge the BLA diagnosis. Conservatively, a suspected BLA is reviewed by an allergist using medical history, skin testing, laboratory testing, and provocation. This clarification is costly and is not remunerated in the German health care system; that is the reason why this testing is only offered in a few specialized clinics and practically not at all in general practice. In view of thousands of affected patients, additional strategies are needed to treat patients with a low risk of hypersensitivity reaction despite suspected allergy with a β-lactam antibiotic. In recent years, various methods have been proposed to eliminate suspected allergy as promptly as possible and directly before necessary treatment with a β-lactam antibiotic, including standardized history (also in the form of an algorithm), skin test with immediate reading after 15 minutes, or administration of a small test dose. Investigations of small case series and also multi-center studies to date have yielded promising results in terms of feasibility and safety.

Conclusion: Of the large number of patients with (questionable) BLA, most have never been tested and - if antibiotic treatment becomes necessary - simply receive an alternative antibiotic. The diagnosis of BLA therefore requires new approaches besides classical allergy testing to critically question BLA.

对青霉素(β-内酰胺)过敏的疑似患者:原因和解决方案。
背景:在欧洲、北美和澳大利亚,目前有 5%-10%的人被归类为青霉素(β-内酰胺)过敏者。在这些有疑问的诊断中,只有 ~ 10% 能通过过敏诊断得到证实,这些诊断大多是在儿童时期做出的:本综述旨在说明青霉素(β-内酰胺)过敏(BLA)诊断经常出现问题的原因、后果和处理建议:结果:错误的 BLA 诊断可能会对今后所需的抗生素治疗产生负面影响,例如使用效果较差的抗生素或广谱抗生素,从而进一步加剧抗生素耐药性不断增加的问题。因此,抗生素监管项目对 BLA 诊断提出严格质疑的压力越来越大。保守的做法是,由过敏学专家通过病史、皮肤测试、实验室测试和诱发试验对疑似 BLA 进行复查。在德国的医疗系统中,这种检查费用昂贵,而且没有报酬;这也是为什么只有少数专科诊所提供这种检查,而普通诊所几乎不提供这种检查的原因。鉴于受影响的患者数以千计,我们需要采取更多的策略来治疗那些尽管怀疑对β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏但发生超敏反应风险较低的患者。近年来,人们提出了各种方法,包括标准化病史(也可采用算法形式)、15 分钟后立即读取结果的皮试或给予小剂量试验剂量等,以尽可能及时地直接在使用 β-内酰胺类抗生素进行必要治疗前消除疑似过敏现象。迄今为止,小型病例系列调查和多中心研究在可行性和安全性方面都取得了令人鼓舞的结果:结论:在大量(疑似)BLA 患者中,大多数人从未接受过检测,如果有必要使用抗生素治疗,也只是简单地使用其他抗生素。因此,除了传统的过敏试验外,诊断 BLA 还需要新的方法来严格质疑 BLA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信