Predictors of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Following High-Risk Exposure.

Kristin L Andrejko, Jake Pry, Jennifer F Myers, John Openshaw, James Watt, Nozomi Birkett, Jennifer L DeGuzman, Camilla M Barbaduomo, Zheng N Dong, Anna T Fang, Paulina M Frost, Timothy Ho, Mahsa H Javadi, Sophia S Li, Vivian H Tran, Christine Wan, Seema Jain, Joseph A Lewnard
{"title":"Predictors of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Following High-Risk Exposure.","authors":"Kristin L Andrejko, Jake Pry, Jennifer F Myers, John Openshaw, James Watt, Nozomi Birkett, Jennifer L DeGuzman, Camilla M Barbaduomo, Zheng N Dong, Anna T Fang, Paulina M Frost, Timothy Ho, Mahsa H Javadi, Sophia S Li, Vivian H Tran, Christine Wan, Seema Jain, Joseph A Lewnard","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab1040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are recommended for COVID-19 prevention. However, the effectiveness of NPIs in preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission remains poorly quantified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a test-negative design case-control study enrolling cases (testing positive for SARS-CoV-2) and controls (testing negative) with molecular SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test results reported to California Department of Public Health between 24 February-12 November, 2021. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of case status among participants who reported contact with an individual known or suspected to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 (\"high-risk exposure\") ≤14 days before testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>751 of 1448 cases (52%) and 255 of 1443 controls (18%) reported high-risk exposures ≤14 days before testing. Adjusted odds of case status were 3.02-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.75-5.22) higher when high-risk exposures occurred with household members (vs. other contacts), 2.10-fold (1.05-4.21) higher when exposures occurred indoors (vs. outdoors only), and 2.15-fold (1.27-3.67) higher when exposures lasted ≥3 hours (vs. shorter durations) among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated individuals; excess risk associated with such exposures was mitigated among fully-vaccinated individuals. Cases were less likely than controls to report mask usage during high-risk exposures (aOR = 0.50 [0.29-0.85]). The adjusted odds of case status was lower for fully-vaccinated (aOR = 0.25 [0.15-0.43]) participants compared to unvaccinated participants. Benefits of mask usage were greatest among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated participants, and in interactions involving non-household contacts or interactions occurring without physical contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NPIs reduced the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection following high-risk exposure. Vaccine effectiveness was substantial for partially and fully vaccinated persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e276-e288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab1040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are recommended for COVID-19 prevention. However, the effectiveness of NPIs in preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission remains poorly quantified.

Methods: We conducted a test-negative design case-control study enrolling cases (testing positive for SARS-CoV-2) and controls (testing negative) with molecular SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test results reported to California Department of Public Health between 24 February-12 November, 2021. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of case status among participants who reported contact with an individual known or suspected to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 ("high-risk exposure") ≤14 days before testing.

Results: 751 of 1448 cases (52%) and 255 of 1443 controls (18%) reported high-risk exposures ≤14 days before testing. Adjusted odds of case status were 3.02-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.75-5.22) higher when high-risk exposures occurred with household members (vs. other contacts), 2.10-fold (1.05-4.21) higher when exposures occurred indoors (vs. outdoors only), and 2.15-fold (1.27-3.67) higher when exposures lasted ≥3 hours (vs. shorter durations) among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated individuals; excess risk associated with such exposures was mitigated among fully-vaccinated individuals. Cases were less likely than controls to report mask usage during high-risk exposures (aOR = 0.50 [0.29-0.85]). The adjusted odds of case status was lower for fully-vaccinated (aOR = 0.25 [0.15-0.43]) participants compared to unvaccinated participants. Benefits of mask usage were greatest among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated participants, and in interactions involving non-household contacts or interactions occurring without physical contact.

Conclusions: NPIs reduced the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection following high-risk exposure. Vaccine effectiveness was substantial for partially and fully vaccinated persons.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高危暴露后严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染的预测因素
背景:建议采用非药物干预措施(npi)预防COVID-19。然而,npi在预防SARS-CoV-2传播方面的有效性仍然难以量化。方法:在2021年2月24日至11月12日期间,我们进行了一项检测阴性的设计病例-对照研究,纳入病例(检测为SARS-CoV-2阳性)和对照组(检测为阴性),并向加州公共卫生部报告了SARS-CoV-2分子诊断检测结果。我们使用条件逻辑回归来估计在检测前≤14天报告与已知或疑似感染SARS-CoV-2(“高风险暴露”)的个体接触的参与者的病例状态的调整优势比(aORs)。结果:1448例中有751例(52%)和1443例对照中有255例(18%)报告在检测前≤14天的高危暴露。当高危暴露发生在家庭成员(与其他接触者相比)时,调整后的病例状态的几率高3.02倍(95%置信区间:1.75-5.22),当暴露发生在室内(与仅在室外相比)时高2.10倍(1.05-4.21),当暴露持续≥3小时(与较短时间相比)时,未接种疫苗和部分接种疫苗的个体高2.15倍(1.27-3.67)。在完全接种疫苗的个体中,与此类暴露相关的过度风险得到了缓解。病例报告高危暴露期间口罩使用情况的可能性低于对照组(aOR = 0.50[0.29-0.85])。与未接种疫苗的参与者相比,完全接种疫苗的参与者(aOR = 0.25[0.15-0.43])的调整后病例状态的几率较低。在未接种疫苗和部分接种疫苗的参与者中,以及在涉及非家庭接触或没有身体接触的互动中,使用口罩的好处最大。结论:npi降低了高危暴露后感染SARS-CoV-2的可能性。对于部分接种疫苗和完全接种疫苗的人,疫苗的有效性是可观的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书