Accuracy in detecting major depressive episodes in older adults using the Swedish versions of the GDS-15 and PHQ-9.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Upsala journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 2021-10-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.48101/ujms.v126.7848
Johnny Pellas, Mattias Damberg
{"title":"Accuracy in detecting major depressive episodes in older adults using the Swedish versions of the GDS-15 and PHQ-9.","authors":"Johnny Pellas,&nbsp;Mattias Damberg","doi":"10.48101/ujms.v126.7848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy at different cut-off values for the Swedish versions of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) compared with a structured clinical psychiatric interview in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community-dwelling participants (<i>N</i> = 113) aged 65 years or older completed the Swedish versions of the GDS-15 and PHQ-9 and were then interviewed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to establish the presence or absence of current major depressive episodes (MDEs). Areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated for each scale, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index for different cut-off values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen participants met the criteria for MDEs. The AUC was 0.97 for the GDS-15 and 0.95 for the PHQ-9. A cut-off of ≥6 on the GDS-15 yielded a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 88%, and a Youden's index of 0.82. A cut-off of ≥5 on the PHQ-9 yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 81%, and a Youden's index of 0.81. The proposed cut-off of ≥10 on the PHQ-9 produced excellent specificity of 95% but a lower sensitivity of 71%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that the Swedish versions of the GDS-15 and PHQ-9 have comparable accuracy as screening instruments for older adults with MDEs. However, the proposed cut-off of 10 on the PHQ-9 might be too high when applied to older individuals in Sweden, and further investigations in larger samples in different healthcare settings are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23458,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559588/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v126.7848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy at different cut-off values for the Swedish versions of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) compared with a structured clinical psychiatric interview in older adults.

Methods: Community-dwelling participants (N = 113) aged 65 years or older completed the Swedish versions of the GDS-15 and PHQ-9 and were then interviewed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to establish the presence or absence of current major depressive episodes (MDEs). Areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated for each scale, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index for different cut-off values.

Results: Seventeen participants met the criteria for MDEs. The AUC was 0.97 for the GDS-15 and 0.95 for the PHQ-9. A cut-off of ≥6 on the GDS-15 yielded a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 88%, and a Youden's index of 0.82. A cut-off of ≥5 on the PHQ-9 yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 81%, and a Youden's index of 0.81. The proposed cut-off of ≥10 on the PHQ-9 produced excellent specificity of 95% but a lower sensitivity of 71%.

Conclusions: This study indicates that the Swedish versions of the GDS-15 and PHQ-9 have comparable accuracy as screening instruments for older adults with MDEs. However, the proposed cut-off of 10 on the PHQ-9 might be too high when applied to older individuals in Sweden, and further investigations in larger samples in different healthcare settings are warranted.

Abstract Image

使用瑞典版GDS-15和PHQ-9检测老年人重度抑郁发作的准确性。
目的:本研究的目的是评估瑞典版15项老年抑郁症量表(GDS-15)和患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)在不同临界值下的诊断准确性,并与老年人结构化临床精神病学访谈进行比较。方法:居住在社区的参与者(N = 113),年龄在65岁或以上,完成瑞典版GDS-15和PHQ-9,然后使用迷你国际神经精神病学访谈(Mini)进行访谈,以确定当前重度抑郁发作(MDEs)的存在或不存在。计算每个量表的曲线下面积(AUC),以及不同临界值下的敏感性、特异性和约登指数。结果:17例患者符合MDEs标准。GDS-15和PHQ-9的AUC分别为0.97和0.95。GDS-15的临界值≥6时,敏感性为94%,特异性为88%,约登指数为0.82。PHQ-9的临界值≥5时,敏感性为100%,特异性为81%,约登指数为0.81。建议的PHQ-9的临界值≥10产生了95%的优秀特异性,但较低的敏感性为71%。结论:本研究表明瑞典版GDS-15和PHQ-9作为老年MDEs筛查工具具有相当的准确性。然而,PHQ-9的10分临界值对于瑞典的老年人来说可能太高了,需要在不同的医疗机构中对更大的样本进行进一步的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Upsala journal of medical sciences
Upsala journal of medical sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences is published for the Upsala Medical Society. It has been published since 1865 and is one of the oldest medical journals in Sweden. The journal publishes clinical and experimental original works in the medical field. Although focusing on regional issues, the journal always welcomes contributions from outside Sweden. Specially extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics, congress proceedings and academic dissertations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信