Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence in emergency and trauma surgery, the ARIES project: an international web-based survey.

Belinda De Simone, Fikri M Abu-Zidan, Andrew A Gumbs, Elie Chouillard, Salomone Di Saverio, Massimo Sartelli, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Toby Collins, Yoram Kluger, Ernest E Moore, Andrej Litvin, Ari Leppaniemi, Pietro Mascagni, Luca Milone, Micaela Piccoli, Mohamed Abu-Hilal, Michael Sugrue, Walter L Biffl, Fausto Catena
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence in emergency and trauma surgery, the ARIES project: an international web-based survey.","authors":"Belinda De Simone,&nbsp;Fikri M Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Andrew A Gumbs,&nbsp;Elie Chouillard,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni,&nbsp;Toby Collins,&nbsp;Yoram Kluger,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Andrej Litvin,&nbsp;Ari Leppaniemi,&nbsp;Pietro Mascagni,&nbsp;Luca Milone,&nbsp;Micaela Piccoli,&nbsp;Mohamed Abu-Hilal,&nbsp;Michael Sugrue,&nbsp;Walter L Biffl,&nbsp;Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00413-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices in the application of AI in the emergency setting among international acute care and emergency surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire composed of 30 multiple choice and open-ended questions was sent to the members of the World Society of Emergency Surgery between 29th May and 28th August 2021. The questionnaire was developed by a panel of 11 international experts and approved by the WSES steering committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>200 participants answered the survey, 32 were females (16%). 172 (86%) surgeons thought that AI will improve acute care surgery. Fifty surgeons (25%) were trained, robotic surgeons and can perform it. Only 19 (9.5%) were currently performing it. 126 (63%) surgeons do not have a robotic system in their institution, and for those who have it, it was mainly used for elective surgery. Only 100 surgeons (50%) were able to define different AI terminology. Participants thought that AI is useful to support training and education (61.5%), perioperative decision making (59.5%), and surgical vision (53%) in emergency surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females in ability, interest in training or expectations of AI (p values 0.91, 0.82, and 0.28, respectively, Mann-Whitney U test). Ability was significantly correlated with interest and expectations (p < 0.0001 Pearson rank correlation, rho 0.42 and 0.47, respectively) but not with experience (p = 0.9, rho - 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of artificial intelligence in the emergency and trauma setting is still in an early phase. The support of emergency and trauma surgeons is essential for the progress of AI in their setting which can be augmented by proper research and training programs in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832812/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00413-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices in the application of AI in the emergency setting among international acute care and emergency surgeons.

Methods: An online questionnaire composed of 30 multiple choice and open-ended questions was sent to the members of the World Society of Emergency Surgery between 29th May and 28th August 2021. The questionnaire was developed by a panel of 11 international experts and approved by the WSES steering committee.

Results: 200 participants answered the survey, 32 were females (16%). 172 (86%) surgeons thought that AI will improve acute care surgery. Fifty surgeons (25%) were trained, robotic surgeons and can perform it. Only 19 (9.5%) were currently performing it. 126 (63%) surgeons do not have a robotic system in their institution, and for those who have it, it was mainly used for elective surgery. Only 100 surgeons (50%) were able to define different AI terminology. Participants thought that AI is useful to support training and education (61.5%), perioperative decision making (59.5%), and surgical vision (53%) in emergency surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females in ability, interest in training or expectations of AI (p values 0.91, 0.82, and 0.28, respectively, Mann-Whitney U test). Ability was significantly correlated with interest and expectations (p < 0.0001 Pearson rank correlation, rho 0.42 and 0.47, respectively) but not with experience (p = 0.9, rho - 0.01).

Conclusions: The implementation of artificial intelligence in the emergency and trauma setting is still in an early phase. The support of emergency and trauma surgeons is essential for the progress of AI in their setting which can be augmented by proper research and training programs in this area.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急诊和创伤外科中人工智能的知识、态度和实践,ARIES项目:一项国际网络调查。
目的:我们旨在评估国际急症护理和急诊外科医生在急诊环境中应用人工智能的知识、态度和实践。方法:于2021年5月29日至8月28日向世界急诊外科学会会员发送一份由30个选择题和开放式问题组成的在线问卷。该问卷由11名国际专家组成的小组编制,并经WSES指导委员会批准。结果:200人参与调查,其中女性32人(16%)。172名(86%)外科医生认为人工智能将改善急症护理手术。50名外科医生(25%)接受过训练,他们是机器人外科医生,可以完成手术。目前只有19个(9.5%)在执行。126位(63%)外科医生的机构没有机器人系统,即使有,也主要用于选择性手术。只有100名外科医生(50%)能够定义不同的人工智能术语。与会者认为人工智能有助于急诊手术的培训和教育(61.5%)、围手术期决策(59.5%)和手术视力(53%)。男女在人工智能能力、训练兴趣或期望方面无统计学差异(p值分别为0.91、0.82和0.28,Mann-Whitney U检验)。能力与兴趣和期望显著相关(p结论:人工智能在急诊和创伤环境中的实施仍处于早期阶段。急诊和创伤外科医生的支持对于人工智能在他们的环境中取得进展至关重要,这可以通过该领域的适当研究和培训计划来增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信