Clinical significance of unfavorable findings in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients for predicting treatment outcomes after contemporary, dose-escalated multimodal radiotherapy.
{"title":"Clinical significance of unfavorable findings in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients for predicting treatment outcomes after contemporary, dose-escalated multimodal radiotherapy.","authors":"Fumihiko Urabe, Kenta Miki, Takahiro Kimura, Hiroshi Sasaki, Kojiro Tashiro, Yuki Tsutsumi, Midoriko Morikawa, Kyosuke Minato, Shun Sato, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Manabu Aoki, Shin Egawa","doi":"10.1002/pros.24289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Few studies have documented the long-term oncological outcomes of favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients treated via contemporary high-dose irradiation. We analyzed the ultimate clinical outcomes of such patients using the current risk sub-stratification schema.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included 693 patients with localized IR prostate cancer treated via low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) and with or without androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in a single institution. Treatment outcomes (biochemical recurrence-free survival [BCRFS] and clinical progression-free survival [CPFS]) were compared according to the numbers of unfavorable findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 693 IR patients, 292 (42.1%) exhibited favorable disease; the remaining 401 (57.9%) exhibited unfavorable disease. Compared with favorable IR status, unfavorable IR status was associated with shorter BCRFS and CPFS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with two to three unfavorable factors experienced the worst oncological outcomes (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Although patients with one or no unfavorable factors responded similarly to LDR-BT monotherapy, this treatment modality was insufficient for preventing biochemical and clinical progression in patients with multiple unfavorable findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term treatment outcomes indicate that patients with IR disease scheduled for LDR-BT should undergo multimodal irradiation if they exhibit two or more unfavorable factors at diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"433-441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Purpose: Few studies have documented the long-term oncological outcomes of favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients treated via contemporary high-dose irradiation. We analyzed the ultimate clinical outcomes of such patients using the current risk sub-stratification schema.
Patients and methods: We included 693 patients with localized IR prostate cancer treated via low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) and with or without androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in a single institution. Treatment outcomes (biochemical recurrence-free survival [BCRFS] and clinical progression-free survival [CPFS]) were compared according to the numbers of unfavorable findings.
Results: Out of the 693 IR patients, 292 (42.1%) exhibited favorable disease; the remaining 401 (57.9%) exhibited unfavorable disease. Compared with favorable IR status, unfavorable IR status was associated with shorter BCRFS and CPFS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with two to three unfavorable factors experienced the worst oncological outcomes (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Although patients with one or no unfavorable factors responded similarly to LDR-BT monotherapy, this treatment modality was insufficient for preventing biochemical and clinical progression in patients with multiple unfavorable findings.
Conclusion: Long-term treatment outcomes indicate that patients with IR disease scheduled for LDR-BT should undergo multimodal irradiation if they exhibit two or more unfavorable factors at diagnosis.