Methylphenidate and Other Pharmacologic Treatments for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease.

Chittaranjan Andrade
{"title":"Methylphenidate and Other Pharmacologic Treatments for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Chittaranjan Andrade","doi":"10.4088/JCP.22f14398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Apathy is a common and important yet often ignored neuropsychiatric symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, used to treat AD, appear ineffective against apathy. A meta-analysis of 4 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) found that psychostimulants significantly attenuated apathy ratings in AD. However, the pooled sample size in this meta-analysis was just 156, and one of the trials was a 2-week crossover study with a large effect. A large RCT (n = 200) has now been published. This study found that methylphenidate (MPH; 20 mg/d) was superior to placebo in the attenuation of apathy scores in patients with possible or probable, mild to moderate AD; the advantage was evident by the end of the second month of treatment and remained evident to the end of 6 months. The effect size at 6 months was small (Cohen <i>d</i> = 0.37). In this RCT, disappointingly, MPH was not superior to placebo on secondary outcomes, including informant-rated apathy, dependence, activities of daily living, quality of life, and neurocognitive performance; caregiver burden was not formally studied. Speculatively, the psychosocial intervention provided to all participants in this RCT may have boosted response in the placebo group, thereby attenuating differences in outcomes between the MPH and placebo groups. A reasonable conclusion is that whereas MPH may attenuate the severity of apathy in patients with AD across as long as 6 months, the absence of improvements in measures of dependence, activities of daily living, and quality of life suggest that this effect of MPH on apathy may not be clinically significant. An unanswered question is whether the benefits of MPH may be clinically significant in real world practice settings in which the delivery of behavioral interventions is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":516853,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.22f14398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Apathy is a common and important yet often ignored neuropsychiatric symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, used to treat AD, appear ineffective against apathy. A meta-analysis of 4 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) found that psychostimulants significantly attenuated apathy ratings in AD. However, the pooled sample size in this meta-analysis was just 156, and one of the trials was a 2-week crossover study with a large effect. A large RCT (n = 200) has now been published. This study found that methylphenidate (MPH; 20 mg/d) was superior to placebo in the attenuation of apathy scores in patients with possible or probable, mild to moderate AD; the advantage was evident by the end of the second month of treatment and remained evident to the end of 6 months. The effect size at 6 months was small (Cohen d = 0.37). In this RCT, disappointingly, MPH was not superior to placebo on secondary outcomes, including informant-rated apathy, dependence, activities of daily living, quality of life, and neurocognitive performance; caregiver burden was not formally studied. Speculatively, the psychosocial intervention provided to all participants in this RCT may have boosted response in the placebo group, thereby attenuating differences in outcomes between the MPH and placebo groups. A reasonable conclusion is that whereas MPH may attenuate the severity of apathy in patients with AD across as long as 6 months, the absence of improvements in measures of dependence, activities of daily living, and quality of life suggest that this effect of MPH on apathy may not be clinically significant. An unanswered question is whether the benefits of MPH may be clinically significant in real world practice settings in which the delivery of behavioral interventions is not feasible.

哌甲酯和其他药物治疗阿尔茨海默病的冷漠。
冷漠是阿尔茨海默病(AD)常见且重要但常被忽视的神经精神症状。胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚,用于治疗阿尔茨海默病,似乎对冷漠无效。一项对4项随机、安慰剂对照试验(rct)的荟萃分析发现,精神兴奋剂可显著降低阿尔茨海默病的冷漠评分。然而,本荟萃分析的合并样本量仅为156例,其中一项试验是为期2周的交叉研究,影响很大。一项大型随机对照试验(n = 200)现已发表。本研究发现哌甲酯(MPH;20mg /d)在可能或可能的轻度至中度AD患者冷漠评分的衰减方面优于安慰剂;这种优势在治疗第二个月结束时很明显,并在6个月结束时保持明显。6个月时的效应量很小(Cohen d = 0.37)。在这项随机对照试验中,令人失望的是,MPH在次要结局上并不优于安慰剂,包括被告知者评价的冷漠、依赖、日常生活活动、生活质量和神经认知表现;照顾者负担未被正式研究。推测,在这项随机对照试验中,提供给所有参与者的社会心理干预可能提高了安慰剂组的反应,从而减弱了MPH组和安慰剂组之间的结果差异。一个合理的结论是,尽管MPH可以在长达6个月的时间内减轻AD患者冷漠的严重程度,但在依赖性、日常生活活动和生活质量方面没有改善,这表明MPH对冷漠的影响可能没有临床意义。一个悬而未决的问题是,在行为干预不可行的现实世界实践环境中,公共卫生的益处是否具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信