A Systematic Review of Interventions Targeting Criminogenic Risk Factors Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness.

IF 3.2
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.202000928
Anna Parisi, Amy Blank Wilson, Melissa Villodas, Jon Phillips, Ehren Dohler
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Interventions Targeting Criminogenic Risk Factors Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness.","authors":"Anna Parisi, Amy Blank Wilson, Melissa Villodas, Jon Phillips, Ehren Dohler","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.202000928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Individuals with serious mental illness are overrepresented in the criminal justice system. Research has found that interventions targeting risk factors for recidivism (i.e., criminogenic risks) reduce justice involvement in the general correctional population. However, more needs to be learned regarding use of these interventions among individuals with serious mental illness. To this end, this systematic review synthesized research on interventions that target criminogenic risk factors and are delivered to justice-involved individuals with serious mental illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of six computerized bibliographic databases from inception to 2021 yielded 8,360 potentially relevant studies. Title and abstract screening, full-text reviews, and data extraction were performed independently, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. To identify additional articles meeting inclusion criteria, experts in the field were contacted, and reference-harvesting techniques were used. Study quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies were identified that evaluated nine interventions delivered to justice-involved individuals with serious mental illness. All identified programs targeted criminogenic risk factors, were group based, and used cognitive-behavioral strategies. Study quality was moderate to high. Interventions were associated with improvements in recidivism, violence, and criminogenic risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review is the first to evaluate interventions targeting criminogenic risks among justice-involved individuals with serious mental illness. Findings suggest that outcomes associated with these interventions are promising. Given the overrepresentation of persons with serious mental illness in the criminal justice system, these findings provide an important step toward identifying services that curb justice involvement in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":520759,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"897-909"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Individuals with serious mental illness are overrepresented in the criminal justice system. Research has found that interventions targeting risk factors for recidivism (i.e., criminogenic risks) reduce justice involvement in the general correctional population. However, more needs to be learned regarding use of these interventions among individuals with serious mental illness. To this end, this systematic review synthesized research on interventions that target criminogenic risk factors and are delivered to justice-involved individuals with serious mental illness.

Methods: A systematic search of six computerized bibliographic databases from inception to 2021 yielded 8,360 potentially relevant studies. Title and abstract screening, full-text reviews, and data extraction were performed independently, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. To identify additional articles meeting inclusion criteria, experts in the field were contacted, and reference-harvesting techniques were used. Study quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: Twenty-one studies were identified that evaluated nine interventions delivered to justice-involved individuals with serious mental illness. All identified programs targeted criminogenic risk factors, were group based, and used cognitive-behavioral strategies. Study quality was moderate to high. Interventions were associated with improvements in recidivism, violence, and criminogenic risk factors.

Conclusions: This review is the first to evaluate interventions targeting criminogenic risks among justice-involved individuals with serious mental illness. Findings suggest that outcomes associated with these interventions are promising. Given the overrepresentation of persons with serious mental illness in the criminal justice system, these findings provide an important step toward identifying services that curb justice involvement in this population.

针对严重精神疾病患者犯罪风险因素干预措施的系统综述。
目的:严重精神疾病患者在刑事司法系统中的比例过高。研究发现,针对累犯风险因素(即犯罪风险)的干预措施减少了一般矫正人群的司法参与。然而,关于在患有严重精神疾病的个人中使用这些干预措施,需要了解更多。为此,本系统综述综合了针对犯罪风险因素的干预措施的研究,并将其提供给与司法有关的严重精神疾病患者。方法:系统检索六个计算机书目数据库,从建立到2021年,共获得8360项可能相关的研究。独立进行标题和摘要筛选、全文审查和数据提取,通过讨论解决差异。为了确定符合纳入标准的其他文章,联系了该领域的专家,并使用了参考文献收集技术。采用混合方法评价工具评价研究质量。结果:21项研究被确定,评估了提供给司法参与的严重精神疾病个体的9项干预措施。所有确定的项目都以犯罪风险因素为目标,以群体为基础,并使用认知行为策略。研究质量为中高。干预措施与累犯、暴力和犯罪风险因素的改善有关。结论:本综述首次评价了针对严重精神疾病司法相关个体犯罪风险的干预措施。研究结果表明,与这些干预措施相关的结果是有希望的。鉴于严重精神疾病患者在刑事司法系统中的比例过高,这些研究结果为确定在这一人群中限制司法介入的服务提供了重要的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信