Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium.

Molecular Therapy. Methods & Clinical Development Pub Date : 2022-01-03 eCollection Date: 2022-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.omtm.2021.12.007
David de Gonzalo-Calvo, Monica Marchese, Jan Hellemans, Fay Betsou, Nanna Lond Skov Frisk, Louise Torp Dalgaard, Päivi Lakkisto, Carole Foy, Andreas Scherer, María Laura Garcia Bermejo, Yvan Devaux
{"title":"Consensus guidelines for the validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research by the CardioRNA consortium.","authors":"David de Gonzalo-Calvo,&nbsp;Monica Marchese,&nbsp;Jan Hellemans,&nbsp;Fay Betsou,&nbsp;Nanna Lond Skov Frisk,&nbsp;Louise Torp Dalgaard,&nbsp;Päivi Lakkisto,&nbsp;Carole Foy,&nbsp;Andreas Scherer,&nbsp;María Laura Garcia Bermejo,&nbsp;Yvan Devaux","doi":"10.1016/j.omtm.2021.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite promising findings, quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based tests for RNA quantification have experienced serious limitations in their clinical application. The noticeable lack of technical standardization remains a huge obstacle in the translation of qPCR-based tests. The incorporation of qPCR-based tests into the clinic will benefit from guidelines for clinical research assay validation. This will ultimately impact the clinical management of the patient, including diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, monitoring of the therapeutic response, and evaluation of toxicity. However, clear assay validation protocols for biomarker investigation in clinical trials using molecular assays are currently lacking<i>.</i> Here, we will focus on the necessary steps, including sample acquisition, processing and storage, RNA purification, target selection, assay design, and experimental design, that need to be taken toward the appropriate validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research. These recommendations can fill the gap between research use only (RUO) and <i>in vitro</i> diagnostics (IVD). Our contribution provides a tool for basic and clinical research for the development of validated assays in the intermediate steps of biomarker research. These guidelines are based on the current understanding and consensus within the EU-CardioRNA COST Action consortium (www.cardiorna.eu). Their applicability encompasses all clinical areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":517056,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Therapy. Methods & Clinical Development","volume":" ","pages":"171-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/0f/main.PMC8792405.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Therapy. Methods & Clinical Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.12.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Despite promising findings, quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based tests for RNA quantification have experienced serious limitations in their clinical application. The noticeable lack of technical standardization remains a huge obstacle in the translation of qPCR-based tests. The incorporation of qPCR-based tests into the clinic will benefit from guidelines for clinical research assay validation. This will ultimately impact the clinical management of the patient, including diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, monitoring of the therapeutic response, and evaluation of toxicity. However, clear assay validation protocols for biomarker investigation in clinical trials using molecular assays are currently lacking. Here, we will focus on the necessary steps, including sample acquisition, processing and storage, RNA purification, target selection, assay design, and experimental design, that need to be taken toward the appropriate validation of qRT-PCR assays in clinical research. These recommendations can fill the gap between research use only (RUO) and in vitro diagnostics (IVD). Our contribution provides a tool for basic and clinical research for the development of validated assays in the intermediate steps of biomarker research. These guidelines are based on the current understanding and consensus within the EU-CardioRNA COST Action consortium (www.cardiorna.eu). Their applicability encompasses all clinical areas.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CardioRNA联盟在临床研究中验证qRT-PCR检测的共识指南。
尽管有很好的发现,基于定量PCR (qPCR)的RNA定量检测在临床应用中遇到了严重的限制。明显缺乏技术标准化仍然是翻译基于qpcr的测试的一个巨大障碍。将基于qpcr的检测纳入临床将受益于临床研究分析验证指南。这将最终影响患者的临床管理,包括诊断、预后、预测、治疗反应监测和毒性评估。然而,目前尚缺乏用于临床试验中使用分子分析进行生物标志物调查的明确的分析验证方案。在这里,我们将重点介绍必要的步骤,包括样品采集、处理和储存、RNA纯化、目标选择、分析设计和实验设计,这些步骤需要在临床研究中对qRT-PCR分析进行适当的验证。这些建议可以填补仅供研究使用(RUO)和体外诊断(IVD)之间的空白。我们的贡献为基础和临床研究提供了一种工具,用于在生物标志物研究的中间步骤中开发有效的检测方法。这些指南是基于EU-CardioRNA成本行动联盟(www.cardiorna.eu)目前的理解和共识。它们的适用性涵盖所有临床领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信