Analysis of Delayed Vaccination Regimens: A Mathematical Modeling Approach.

Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-20 DOI:10.3390/epidemiologia2030021
Gilberto Gonzalez-Parra
{"title":"Analysis of Delayed Vaccination Regimens: A Mathematical Modeling Approach.","authors":"Gilberto Gonzalez-Parra","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia2030021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first round of vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in early December of 2020 in a few countries. There are several vaccines, and each has a different efficacy and mechanism of action. Several countries, for example, the United Kingdom and the USA, have been able to develop consistent vaccination programs where a great percentage of the population has been vaccinated (May 2021). However, in other countries, a low percentage of the population has been vaccinated due to constraints related to vaccine supply and distribution capacity. Countries such as the USA and the UK have implemented different vaccination strategies, and some scholars have been debating the optimal strategy for vaccine campaigns. This problem is complex due to the great number of variables that affect the relevant outcomes. In this article, we study the impact of different vaccination regimens on main health outcomes such as deaths, hospitalizations, and the number of infected. We develop a mathematical model of COVID-19 transmission to focus on this important health policy issue. Thus, we are able to identify the optimal strategy regarding vaccination campaigns. We find that for vaccines with high efficacy (>70%) after the first dose, the optimal strategy is to delay inoculation with the second dose. On the other hand, for a low first dose vaccine efficacy, it is better to use the standard vaccination regimen of 4 weeks between doses. Thus, under the delayed second dose option, a campaign focus on generating a certain immunity in as great a number of people as fast as possible is preferable to having an almost perfect immunity in fewer people first. Therefore, based on these results, we suggest that the UK implemented a better vaccination campaign than that in the USA with regard to time between doses. The results presented here provide scientific guidelines for other countries where vaccination campaigns are just starting, or the percentage of vaccinated people is small.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"271-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3390/epidemiologia2030021","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia2030021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The first round of vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in early December of 2020 in a few countries. There are several vaccines, and each has a different efficacy and mechanism of action. Several countries, for example, the United Kingdom and the USA, have been able to develop consistent vaccination programs where a great percentage of the population has been vaccinated (May 2021). However, in other countries, a low percentage of the population has been vaccinated due to constraints related to vaccine supply and distribution capacity. Countries such as the USA and the UK have implemented different vaccination strategies, and some scholars have been debating the optimal strategy for vaccine campaigns. This problem is complex due to the great number of variables that affect the relevant outcomes. In this article, we study the impact of different vaccination regimens on main health outcomes such as deaths, hospitalizations, and the number of infected. We develop a mathematical model of COVID-19 transmission to focus on this important health policy issue. Thus, we are able to identify the optimal strategy regarding vaccination campaigns. We find that for vaccines with high efficacy (>70%) after the first dose, the optimal strategy is to delay inoculation with the second dose. On the other hand, for a low first dose vaccine efficacy, it is better to use the standard vaccination regimen of 4 weeks between doses. Thus, under the delayed second dose option, a campaign focus on generating a certain immunity in as great a number of people as fast as possible is preferable to having an almost perfect immunity in fewer people first. Therefore, based on these results, we suggest that the UK implemented a better vaccination campaign than that in the USA with regard to time between doses. The results presented here provide scientific guidelines for other countries where vaccination campaigns are just starting, or the percentage of vaccinated people is small.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

延迟疫苗接种方案分析:一种数学建模方法。
2020年12月初,一些国家开始了针对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的第一轮疫苗接种。有几种疫苗,每种疫苗都有不同的功效和作用机制。一些国家,例如英国和美国,已经能够制定一致的疫苗接种规划,其中大部分人口已经接种了疫苗(2021年5月)。然而,在其他国家,由于与疫苗供应和分发能力有关的限制,接种疫苗的人口比例很低。美国和英国等国家实施了不同的疫苗接种策略,一些学者一直在争论疫苗运动的最佳策略。这个问题很复杂,因为影响相关结果的变量很多。在本文中,我们研究了不同疫苗接种方案对主要健康结果(如死亡、住院和感染人数)的影响。我们开发了COVID-19传播的数学模型,以关注这一重要的卫生政策问题。因此,我们能够确定关于疫苗接种运动的最佳策略。我们发现,对于第一剂后效力较高(>70%)的疫苗,最佳策略是延迟接种第二剂。另一方面,对于首剂疫苗效力较低的情况,最好采用间隔4周的标准疫苗接种方案。因此,在延迟第二次接种方案下,侧重于在尽可能多的人中尽快产生某种免疫力的运动比首先在少数人中产生几乎完全免疫力的运动更可取。因此,基于这些结果,我们建议英国实施了更好的疫苗接种运动比在美国在剂量之间的时间。这里提出的结果为疫苗接种运动刚刚开始或疫苗接种人群比例很小的其他国家提供了科学指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信