Investigation of Feedback Schedules on Speech Motor Learning in Older Adults.

Phil Weir-Mayta, Kristie A Spencer, Steven M Bierer, Ayoub Daliri, Peter Ondish, Ashley France, Erika Hutchison, Caitlin Sears
{"title":"Investigation of Feedback Schedules on Speech Motor Learning in Older Adults.","authors":"Phil Weir-Mayta, Kristie A Spencer, Steven M Bierer, Ayoub Daliri, Peter Ondish, Ashley France, Erika Hutchison, Caitlin Sears","doi":"10.28933/ijoar-2019-03-2006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The principles of motor learning (PML) emerged from studies of limb motor skills in healthy, young adults. The applicability of these principles to speech motor learning, and to older adults, is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine one PML, feedback frequency, and its effect on retention and generalization of a novel speech and comparable tracing task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty older adults completed a speech motor learning task requiring the production of a novel phrase at speaking rates 2 times and 3 times slower than habitual rate. Participants also completed a limb motor learning task requiring the tracing of a sine wave 2x and 3x slower than habitual rate. Participants were randomly assigned to receive feedback every trial, every 5th trial, or every 10th trial. Mean absolute error was measured to examine immediate generalization, delayed generalization, and 2-day retention.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Results suggested that feedback frequency did not have an effect on the retention and generalization of the speech or manual task, supporting the small but growing literature highlighting the constraints of generalizing the PML to other modalities and populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93300,"journal":{"name":"International journal of aging research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556735/pdf/nihms-1721571.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of aging research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28933/ijoar-2019-03-2006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The principles of motor learning (PML) emerged from studies of limb motor skills in healthy, young adults. The applicability of these principles to speech motor learning, and to older adults, is uncertain.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to examine one PML, feedback frequency, and its effect on retention and generalization of a novel speech and comparable tracing task.

Methods: Sixty older adults completed a speech motor learning task requiring the production of a novel phrase at speaking rates 2 times and 3 times slower than habitual rate. Participants also completed a limb motor learning task requiring the tracing of a sine wave 2x and 3x slower than habitual rate. Participants were randomly assigned to receive feedback every trial, every 5th trial, or every 10th trial. Mean absolute error was measured to examine immediate generalization, delayed generalization, and 2-day retention.

Findings: Results suggested that feedback frequency did not have an effect on the retention and generalization of the speech or manual task, supporting the small but growing literature highlighting the constraints of generalizing the PML to other modalities and populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

研究反馈计划对老年人言语运动学习的影响
背景:运动学习原则(PML)产生于对健康、年轻成年人肢体运动技能的研究。目的:本研究的目的是考察一种 PML(反馈频率)及其对新颖语言和可比追踪任务的保持和泛化的影响:方法: 60 名老年人完成了一项语言运动学习任务,要求以比习惯语速慢 2 倍和 3 倍的语速说出一个新的短语。参与者还完成了一项肢体运动学习任务,要求以比习惯速度慢 2 倍和 3 倍的速度描画正弦波。参与者被随机分配到每次试验、每隔 5 次试验或每隔 10 次试验接受反馈。对平均绝对误差进行测量,以检查即时泛化、延迟泛化和两天的保持情况:结果表明,反馈频率对语音或手动任务的保持和泛化没有影响,这支持了少量但不断增加的文献,这些文献强调了将 PML 泛化到其他模式和人群的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信