Differentiating Cardiac and Pulmonary Causes of Dyspnea Using Ultrasonography and Dyspnea Discrimination Index.

IF 1.5
Gina M Chandy, Sowmya Sathyendra, Kishore Pichamuthu, Darpanarayan Hazra, Kundavaram Pp Abhilash
{"title":"Differentiating Cardiac and Pulmonary Causes of Dyspnea Using Ultrasonography and Dyspnea Discrimination Index.","authors":"Gina M Chandy,&nbsp;Sowmya Sathyendra,&nbsp;Kishore Pichamuthu,&nbsp;Darpanarayan Hazra,&nbsp;Kundavaram Pp Abhilash","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most common reasons for emergency room (ER) visits is acute dyspnea. The challenge is in differentiating a cardiac and pulmonary cause of acute breathlessness. Hence, we have studied the effectiveness of the dyspnea discrimination index (DDI) used in conjunction with ultrasonography (USG) in distinguishing between cardiac and pulmonary causes of dyspnea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study conducted in the ER and general medicine wards to evaluate the efficacy of the DDI and USG in dyspneic patients. Data were entered in a standard data sheet and analysis was done using SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the patients were between the ages of 45 and 60, with a male predominance. Risk factors like smoking were more common in the pulmonary group (36%). Pulmonary cause of breathlessness was seen in 62% of patients and cardiac pathology was noted in 28%. The mean (SD) DDI value and DDI% are as follows: pulmonary group (DDI)-5.47 (SD: 2.82); cardiac group (DDI)-8.34 (SD: 3.75); pulmonary group (DDI%)-1.31 (SD: 0.68); cardiac group (DDI%)-2.34 (SD: 1.14). There was a significant difference in DDI% between the pulmonary and cardiac groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001). DDI was found to have a sensitivity and specificity of 77.3% and 70%, respectively. While for DDI%, sensitivity and specificity were 72.7% and 72%, respectively. Lung USG had 98% sensitivity and 95.5% specificity, with a narrow confidence interval. The positive likelihood ratio was noted to be 21.6, indicating a very high post-test probability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DDI and USG in conjunction had good discriminative power, when it came to distinguishing between cardiac and pulmonary causes of dyspnea. USG had a high specificity and sensitivity, making it suitable for identifying the cause of dyspnea in a tertiary care ER setting.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Chandy GM, Sathyendra S, Pichamuthu K, Hazra D, Abhilash KPP. Differentiating Cardiac and Pulmonary Causes of Dyspnea Using Ultrasonography and Dyspnea Discrimination Index. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(1):33-38.</p>","PeriodicalId":520643,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"33-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/db/ijccm-26-33.PMC8783246.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: One of the most common reasons for emergency room (ER) visits is acute dyspnea. The challenge is in differentiating a cardiac and pulmonary cause of acute breathlessness. Hence, we have studied the effectiveness of the dyspnea discrimination index (DDI) used in conjunction with ultrasonography (USG) in distinguishing between cardiac and pulmonary causes of dyspnea.

Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in the ER and general medicine wards to evaluate the efficacy of the DDI and USG in dyspneic patients. Data were entered in a standard data sheet and analysis was done using SPSS software.

Results: The majority of the patients were between the ages of 45 and 60, with a male predominance. Risk factors like smoking were more common in the pulmonary group (36%). Pulmonary cause of breathlessness was seen in 62% of patients and cardiac pathology was noted in 28%. The mean (SD) DDI value and DDI% are as follows: pulmonary group (DDI)-5.47 (SD: 2.82); cardiac group (DDI)-8.34 (SD: 3.75); pulmonary group (DDI%)-1.31 (SD: 0.68); cardiac group (DDI%)-2.34 (SD: 1.14). There was a significant difference in DDI% between the pulmonary and cardiac groups (p = 0.001). DDI was found to have a sensitivity and specificity of 77.3% and 70%, respectively. While for DDI%, sensitivity and specificity were 72.7% and 72%, respectively. Lung USG had 98% sensitivity and 95.5% specificity, with a narrow confidence interval. The positive likelihood ratio was noted to be 21.6, indicating a very high post-test probability.

Conclusion: The DDI and USG in conjunction had good discriminative power, when it came to distinguishing between cardiac and pulmonary causes of dyspnea. USG had a high specificity and sensitivity, making it suitable for identifying the cause of dyspnea in a tertiary care ER setting.

How to cite this article: Chandy GM, Sathyendra S, Pichamuthu K, Hazra D, Abhilash KPP. Differentiating Cardiac and Pulmonary Causes of Dyspnea Using Ultrasonography and Dyspnea Discrimination Index. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(1):33-38.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用超声和呼吸困难鉴别指数鉴别呼吸困难的心、肺原因。
背景:急诊(ER)就诊的最常见原因之一是急性呼吸困难。难点在于如何区分急性呼吸困难的心因和肺因。因此,我们研究了呼吸困难识别指数(DDI)与超声检查(USG)结合使用在区分呼吸困难的心脏和肺部原因方面的有效性。方法:在急诊科和普通内科病房进行前瞻性研究,评价DDI和USG对呼吸困难患者的疗效。数据输入标准数据表,使用SPSS软件进行分析。结果:患者年龄以45 ~ 60岁为主,男性居多。吸烟等危险因素在肺组中更为常见(36%)。62%的患者出现呼吸困难的肺部原因,28%的患者出现心脏病理。平均(SD) DDI值及DDI%如下:肺组(DDI)-5.47 (SD: 2.82);心脏组(DDI)-8.34 (SD: 3.75);肺组(DDI%)-1.31 (SD: 0.68);心脏组(DDI%)-2.34 (SD: 1.14)。肺组和心脏组DDI%差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。DDI的敏感性和特异性分别为77.3%和70%。DDI%的敏感性和特异性分别为72.7%和72%。肺USG的敏感性为98%,特异性为95.5%,置信区间较窄。阳性似然比为21.6,表明检验后概率非常高。结论:DDI和USG联合使用在区分呼吸困难的心源性和肺源性病因方面具有良好的鉴别能力。USG具有很高的特异性和敏感性,使其适用于三级护理急诊环境中识别呼吸困难的原因。本文出处:Chandy GM, Sathyendra S, Pichamuthu K, Hazra D, Abhilash KPP。利用超声和呼吸困难鉴别指数鉴别呼吸困难的心、肺原因。中华检验医学杂志;2013;26(1):33-38。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书