[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer: implications for surgery].

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Chirurg Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-08 DOI:10.1007/s00104-021-01540-4
Carolin Kastner, Bernhard Petritsch, Joachim Reibetanz, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Armin Wiegering
{"title":"[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer: implications for surgery].","authors":"Carolin Kastner,&nbsp;Bernhard Petritsch,&nbsp;Joachim Reibetanz,&nbsp;Christoph-Thomas Germer,&nbsp;Armin Wiegering","doi":"10.1007/s00104-021-01540-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For (locally advanced) rectal cancer, a multimodal therapy concept comprising neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, radical surgical resection with partial/complete mesorectal excision and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy represents the current international standard of care. Further developments in neoadjuvant therapy concepts, such as the principle of total neoadjuvant therapy, lead to an increasing number of patients who show a complete clinical response in restaging after neoadjuvant therapy without clinically detectable residual tumor. In view of the risk associated with radical surgical resection in terms of perioperative morbidity and a potentially non-continence-preserving procedure, the question of the oncological justifiability of an organ-preserving procedure in the case of a complete clinical response under neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being raised. The therapeutic principle of watch and wait, defined by refraining from immediate radical surgical resection and inclusion in a close-meshed, structured follow-up program, currently appears to be oncologically justifiable based on the current study situation; however, for the initial evaluation of the extent of the clinical response and for the structuring of the close-meshed follow-up program, further optimization and standardization based on broadly designed studies appear necessary in order to be able to provide this concept to a clearly defined patient collective as an oncologically equivalent therapy principle also outside specialized centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurg","volume":"93 2","pages":"144-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01540-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For (locally advanced) rectal cancer, a multimodal therapy concept comprising neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, radical surgical resection with partial/complete mesorectal excision and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy represents the current international standard of care. Further developments in neoadjuvant therapy concepts, such as the principle of total neoadjuvant therapy, lead to an increasing number of patients who show a complete clinical response in restaging after neoadjuvant therapy without clinically detectable residual tumor. In view of the risk associated with radical surgical resection in terms of perioperative morbidity and a potentially non-continence-preserving procedure, the question of the oncological justifiability of an organ-preserving procedure in the case of a complete clinical response under neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being raised. The therapeutic principle of watch and wait, defined by refraining from immediate radical surgical resection and inclusion in a close-meshed, structured follow-up program, currently appears to be oncologically justifiable based on the current study situation; however, for the initial evaluation of the extent of the clinical response and for the structuring of the close-meshed follow-up program, further optimization and standardization based on broadly designed studies appear necessary in order to be able to provide this concept to a clearly defined patient collective as an oncologically equivalent therapy principle also outside specialized centers.

[直肠癌新辅助治疗后的完全缓解:对手术的影响]。
对于(局部晚期)直肠癌,包括新辅助放疗/放化疗、根治性手术切除部分/完全肠系膜切除术以及随后的辅助化疗在内的多模式治疗概念代表了目前国际上的治疗标准。新辅助治疗概念的进一步发展,如全面新辅助治疗原则,导致越来越多的患者在新辅助治疗后的再治疗中表现出完全的临床反应,没有临床可检测到的残留肿瘤。鉴于根治性手术切除在围手术期发病率和潜在的不保留失禁手术方面的风险,在新辅助治疗下完全临床反应的情况下,器官保留手术的肿瘤学合理性问题越来越多地提出。根据目前的研究情况,观察和等待的治疗原则,即避免立即根治性手术切除和纳入一个紧密的、结构化的随访计划,目前在肿瘤学上是合理的;然而,对于临床反应程度的初步评估和紧密随访计划的构建,基于广泛设计的研究的进一步优化和标准化似乎是必要的,以便能够将这一概念提供给明确定义的患者群体,作为肿瘤等效治疗原则,也适用于专业中心之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurg
Chirurg 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen The magazine is intended for surgeons in hospitals, clinics and research. Each issue includes a comprehensive theme: Practical summaries access to selected topics and provide the reader with a compilation of current knowledge in all fields of surgery. Besides imparting relevant background knowledge, the emphasis is on the review of scientific results and practical experience. The reader will find concrete recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信