Limitations of End-Tidal CO2 Measured with a Portable Capnometer to Estimate PaCO2 for Patients with Respiratory Disease.

IF 0.8 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Takatoshi Enomoto, Yoshikazu Inoue, Yuichi Adachi, Shunichi Kouno, Yuji Inagaki, Koji Azuma, Kanako Katayama, Naoko Takeuchi, Yoshinobu Matsuda
{"title":"Limitations of End-Tidal CO2 Measured with a Portable Capnometer to Estimate PaCO2 for Patients with Respiratory Disease.","authors":"Takatoshi Enomoto,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Inoue,&nbsp;Yuichi Adachi,&nbsp;Shunichi Kouno,&nbsp;Yuji Inagaki,&nbsp;Koji Azuma,&nbsp;Kanako Katayama,&nbsp;Naoko Takeuchi,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Matsuda","doi":"10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) measured with a portable capnometer and PaCO2 in respiratory disease patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients whose EtCO2, measured with a portable capnometer using a mouthpiece, and PaCO2 were simultaneously assessed at a single center from August 2017 to September 2018. The primary outcome was the relationship between EtCO2 and PaCO2. We conducted subgroup analyses in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), with and without O2 supplementation. The relationship between EtCO2 and PaCO2 was analyzed using Spearman's rank test and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 patients were registered in this study. There was a moderate correlation between EtCO2 and PaCO2 (rho = 0.41). The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean bias was 0.32 mmHg (95% CI: -1.28 to 1.92), the limits of agreement (LOA) were -15.48 and 16.13 mmHg, and the percent error was 38.49%. The LOA in patients with ILD were -15.12 and 13.75 mmHg. In patients with O2 supplementation, the mean bias was greater, and the LOA were wider than in those without O2 supplementation (mean bias: 7.17 vs. -1.18 mmHg, respectively; LOA: -14.29 and 28.62 mmHg vs. -13.82 and 11.46 mmHg, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the clinical setting, the relationship between EtCO2 and PaCO2 was poor in patients with respiratory disease, especially in those receiving O2 supplementation, compared with that reported in previous studies. It may be difficult to precisely estimate PaCO2 in patients with respiratory disease based on measurements of EtCO2.</p>","PeriodicalId":37452,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Thoracic Journal","volume":"22 3","pages":"212-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975349/pdf/ttj-22-3-212.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Thoracic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) measured with a portable capnometer and PaCO2 in respiratory disease patients.

Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients whose EtCO2, measured with a portable capnometer using a mouthpiece, and PaCO2 were simultaneously assessed at a single center from August 2017 to September 2018. The primary outcome was the relationship between EtCO2 and PaCO2. We conducted subgroup analyses in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), with and without O2 supplementation. The relationship between EtCO2 and PaCO2 was analyzed using Spearman's rank test and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: A total of 100 patients were registered in this study. There was a moderate correlation between EtCO2 and PaCO2 (rho = 0.41). The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean bias was 0.32 mmHg (95% CI: -1.28 to 1.92), the limits of agreement (LOA) were -15.48 and 16.13 mmHg, and the percent error was 38.49%. The LOA in patients with ILD were -15.12 and 13.75 mmHg. In patients with O2 supplementation, the mean bias was greater, and the LOA were wider than in those without O2 supplementation (mean bias: 7.17 vs. -1.18 mmHg, respectively; LOA: -14.29 and 28.62 mmHg vs. -13.82 and 11.46 mmHg, respectively).

Conclusion: In the clinical setting, the relationship between EtCO2 and PaCO2 was poor in patients with respiratory disease, especially in those receiving O2 supplementation, compared with that reported in previous studies. It may be difficult to precisely estimate PaCO2 in patients with respiratory disease based on measurements of EtCO2.

用便携式二氧化碳计测量潮末CO2对呼吸系统疾病患者PaCO2的局限性
目的:探讨便携式二氧化碳计测得的末潮二氧化碳(EtCO2)与呼吸系统疾病患者PaCO2的关系。材料和方法:我们回顾性回顾了2017年8月至2018年9月在单个中心同时使用带口的便携式二氧化碳计测量EtCO2和PaCO2的患者。主要观察指标为EtCO2与PaCO2的关系。我们对间质性肺疾病(ILD)患者进行了亚组分析,并对是否补充氧气进行了分析。采用Spearman’s rank检验和Bland-Altman分析分析EtCO2与PaCO2的关系。结果:本研究共纳入100例患者。EtCO2与PaCO2呈正相关(rho = 0.41)。Bland-Altman图显示,平均偏差为0.32 mmHg (95% CI: -1.28 ~ 1.92),一致性限(LOA)为-15.48和16.13 mmHg,误差百分比为38.49%。ILD患者的LOA分别为-15.12和13.75 mmHg。在补充氧气的患者中,平均偏倚更大,LOA比未补充氧气的患者更宽(平均偏倚分别为7.17 vs -1.18 mmHg;LOA: -14.29和28.62 mmHg vs. -13.82和11.46 mmHg)。结论:在临床环境中,呼吸系统疾病患者,特别是接受补氧治疗的患者,EtCO2与PaCO2的关系较差,与以往的研究报道相比。基于EtCO2的测量,可能难以准确估计呼吸系统疾病患者的PaCO2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Thoracic Journal
Turkish Thoracic Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Turkish Thoracic Journal (Turk Thorac J) is the double-blind, peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Thoracic Society. The journal is a quarterly publication, published on January, April, July, and October and its publication language is English. Turkish Thoracic Journal started its publication life following the merger of two journals which were published under the titles “Turkish Respiratory Journal” and “Toraks Journal” until 2007. Archives of both journals were passed on to the Turkish Thoracic Journal. The aim of the journal is to convey scientific developments and to create a dynamic discussion platform about pulmonary diseases. With this intent, the journal accepts articles from all related scientific areas that address adult and pediatric pulmonary diseases, as well as thoracic imaging, environmental and occupational disorders, intensive care, sleep disorders and thoracic surgery. Clinical and research articles, reviews, statements of agreement or disagreement on controversial issues, national and international consensus reports, abstracts and comments of important international articles, interesting case reports, writings related to clinical and practical applications, letters to the editor, and editorials are accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信