Diagnostic Challenges in Sepsis.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Current Infectious Disease Reports Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s11908-021-00765-y
Chris F Duncan, Taryn Youngstein, Marianne D Kirrane, Dagan O Lonsdale
{"title":"Diagnostic Challenges in Sepsis.","authors":"Chris F Duncan,&nbsp;Taryn Youngstein,&nbsp;Marianne D Kirrane,&nbsp;Dagan O Lonsdale","doi":"10.1007/s11908-021-00765-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Sepsis is a leading cause of death worldwide. Groundbreaking international collaborative efforts have culminated in the widely accepted surviving sepsis guidelines, with iterative improvements in management strategies and definitions providing important advances in care for patients. Key to the diagnosis of sepsis is identification of infection, and whilst the diagnostic criteria for sepsis is now clear, the diagnosis of infection remains a challenge and there is often discordance between clinician assessments for infection.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We review the utility of common biochemical, microbiological and radiological tools employed by clinicians to diagnose infection and explore the difficulty of making a diagnosis of infection in severe inflammatory states through illustrative case reports. Finally, we discuss some of the novel and emerging approaches in diagnosis of infection and sepsis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While prompt diagnosis and treatment of sepsis is essential to improve outcomes in sepsis, there remains no single tool to reliably identify or exclude infection. This contributes to unnecessary antimicrobial use that is harmful to individuals and populations. There is therefore a pressing need for novel solutions. Machine learning approaches using multiple diagnostic and clinical inputs may offer a potential solution but as yet these approaches remain experimental.</p>","PeriodicalId":48839,"journal":{"name":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8544629/pdf/","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-021-00765-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Purpose of review: Sepsis is a leading cause of death worldwide. Groundbreaking international collaborative efforts have culminated in the widely accepted surviving sepsis guidelines, with iterative improvements in management strategies and definitions providing important advances in care for patients. Key to the diagnosis of sepsis is identification of infection, and whilst the diagnostic criteria for sepsis is now clear, the diagnosis of infection remains a challenge and there is often discordance between clinician assessments for infection.

Recent findings: We review the utility of common biochemical, microbiological and radiological tools employed by clinicians to diagnose infection and explore the difficulty of making a diagnosis of infection in severe inflammatory states through illustrative case reports. Finally, we discuss some of the novel and emerging approaches in diagnosis of infection and sepsis.

Summary: While prompt diagnosis and treatment of sepsis is essential to improve outcomes in sepsis, there remains no single tool to reliably identify or exclude infection. This contributes to unnecessary antimicrobial use that is harmful to individuals and populations. There is therefore a pressing need for novel solutions. Machine learning approaches using multiple diagnostic and clinical inputs may offer a potential solution but as yet these approaches remain experimental.

败血症的诊断挑战。
综述目的:脓毒症是世界范围内死亡的主要原因。突破性的国际合作努力最终形成了被广泛接受的脓毒症生存指南,管理策略和定义的不断改进为患者护理提供了重要进展。脓毒症诊断的关键是感染的识别,虽然脓毒症的诊断标准现在很明确,但感染的诊断仍然是一个挑战,临床医生对感染的评估经常存在不一致。最近的发现:我们回顾了临床医生用于诊断感染的常用生化、微生物学和放射学工具的实用性,并通过说明性病例报告探讨了在严重炎症状态下诊断感染的困难。最后,我们讨论了一些新的和新兴的方法在诊断感染和败血症。摘要:虽然及时诊断和治疗脓毒症对于改善脓毒症的预后至关重要,但目前还没有一种工具可以可靠地识别或排除感染。这导致不必要的抗微生物药物使用,对个人和人群有害。因此,迫切需要新的解决方案。使用多种诊断和临床输入的机器学习方法可能提供一个潜在的解决方案,但目前这些方法仍处于实验阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Infectious Disease Reports
Current Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of infectious disease. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, tropical and travel medicine, and urinary tract infections. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信