Are genome-edited micro-organisms covered by Directive 2009/41/EC?-implications of the CJEU's judgment in the case C-528/16 for the contained use of genome-edited micro-organisms.

IF 2.5 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Pub Date : 2022-01-31 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsab033
Hans-Georg Dederer, David Hamburger
{"title":"Are genome-edited micro-organisms covered by Directive 2009/41/EC?-implications of the CJEU's judgment in the case C-528/16 for the contained use of genome-edited micro-organisms.","authors":"Hans-Georg Dederer,&nbsp;David Hamburger","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsab033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In its judgement of July 25, 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the case C-528/16, <i>Confédération paysanne and Others</i>, held that organisms obtained by techniques of mutagenesis are 'genetically modified organisms' (GMOs). It follows from the Court's reasoning that genome-edited organisms, ie organisms resulting from techniques of directed mutagenesis, are GMOs as well and are fully regulated by Directive 2001/18/EC. However, Directive 2001/18/EC only stipulates rules for the deliberate release and placing on the market of GMOs. By contrast, the European Union (EU) has adopted a separate set of rules laid down in Directive 2009/41/EC, which apply to the so-called 'contained use' of 'genetically modified micro-organisms' (GMMs). Whether also genome-edited micro-organisms are GMMs and, thus, subject to Directive 2009/41/EC is of crucial importance since contained use activities with genome-edited micro-organisms are currently carried out extensively, eg in laboratories and research facilities. An in-depth legal analysis shows that the CJEU's interpretation of Directive 2001/18/EC can be extended to Directive 2009/41/EC which means that, in the end, genome-edited micro-organisms are GMMs invariably subject to Directive 2009/41/EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56266,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","volume":" ","pages":"lsab033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/93/lsab033.PMC8801222.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In its judgement of July 25, 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the case C-528/16, Confédération paysanne and Others, held that organisms obtained by techniques of mutagenesis are 'genetically modified organisms' (GMOs). It follows from the Court's reasoning that genome-edited organisms, ie organisms resulting from techniques of directed mutagenesis, are GMOs as well and are fully regulated by Directive 2001/18/EC. However, Directive 2001/18/EC only stipulates rules for the deliberate release and placing on the market of GMOs. By contrast, the European Union (EU) has adopted a separate set of rules laid down in Directive 2009/41/EC, which apply to the so-called 'contained use' of 'genetically modified micro-organisms' (GMMs). Whether also genome-edited micro-organisms are GMMs and, thus, subject to Directive 2009/41/EC is of crucial importance since contained use activities with genome-edited micro-organisms are currently carried out extensively, eg in laboratories and research facilities. An in-depth legal analysis shows that the CJEU's interpretation of Directive 2001/18/EC can be extended to Directive 2009/41/EC which means that, in the end, genome-edited micro-organisms are GMMs invariably subject to Directive 2009/41/EC.

指令2009/41/EC是否涵盖基因组编辑微生物?-欧洲高等法院在C-528/16案中对基因组编辑微生物的限制使用的判决的影响。
在2018年7月25日的判决中,欧盟法院(CJEU)在C-528/16号案件中,确认了通过诱变技术获得的生物是“转基因生物”(GMOs)。根据法院的推理,基因组编辑的生物体,即由定向诱变技术产生的生物体,也是转基因生物,并完全受2001/18/EC号指令的监管。然而,2001/18/EC指令仅规定了转基因生物故意释放和投放市场的规则。相比之下,欧盟(EU)在指令2009/41/EC中采用了一套单独的规则,适用于“转基因微生物”(GMMs)的所谓“限制使用”。基因组编辑的微生物是否也属于转基因生物,因此是否受2009/41/EC指令的约束至关重要,因为目前在实验室和研究设施中广泛开展了基因组编辑微生物的使用活动。深入的法律分析表明,欧盟法院对2001/18/EC指令的解释可以扩展到2009/41/EC指令,这意味着,基因组编辑的微生物最终都是转基因生物,必须服从2009/41/EC指令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law and the Biosciences (JLB) is the first fully Open Access peer-reviewed legal journal focused on the advances at the intersection of law and the biosciences. A co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press, this open access, online, and interdisciplinary academic journal publishes cutting-edge scholarship in this important new field. The Journal contains original and response articles, essays, and commentaries on a wide range of topics, including bioethics, neuroethics, genetics, reproductive technologies, stem cells, enhancement, patent law, and food and drug regulation. JLB is published as one volume with three issues per year with new articles posted online on an ongoing basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信