LSD and creativity: Increased novelty and symbolic thinking, decreased utility and convergent thinking.

Isabel Wießner, Marcelo Falchi, Lucas Oliveira Maia, Dimitri Daldegan-Bueno, Fernanda Palhano-Fontes, Natasha L Mason, Johannes G Ramaekers, Madeleine E Gross, Jonathan W Schooler, Amanda Feilding, Sidarta Ribeiro, Draulio B Araujo, Luís Fernando Tófoli
{"title":"LSD and creativity: Increased novelty and symbolic thinking, decreased utility and convergent thinking.","authors":"Isabel Wießner,&nbsp;Marcelo Falchi,&nbsp;Lucas Oliveira Maia,&nbsp;Dimitri Daldegan-Bueno,&nbsp;Fernanda Palhano-Fontes,&nbsp;Natasha L Mason,&nbsp;Johannes G Ramaekers,&nbsp;Madeleine E Gross,&nbsp;Jonathan W Schooler,&nbsp;Amanda Feilding,&nbsp;Sidarta Ribeiro,&nbsp;Draulio B Araujo,&nbsp;Luís Fernando Tófoli","doi":"10.1177/02698811211069113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controversy surrounds psychedelics and their potential to boost creativity. To date, psychedelic studies lack a uniform conceptualization of creativity and methodologically rigorous designs.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed at addressing previous issues by examining the effects of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) on creativity using multimodal tasks and multidimensional approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 24 healthy volunteers received 50 μg of LSD or inactive placebo. Near drug peak, a creativity task battery was applied, including pattern meaning task (PMT), alternate uses task (AUT), picture concept task (PCT), creative metaphors task (MET) and figural creativity task (FIG). Creativity was assessed by scoring creativity criteria (novelty, utility, surprise), calculating divergent thinking (fluency, originality, flexibility, elaboration) and convergent thinking, computing semantic distances (semantic spread, semantic steps) and searching for data-driven special features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LSD, compared to placebo, changed several creativity measurements pointing to three overall LSD-induced phenomena: (1) 'pattern break', reflected by increased novelty, surprise, originality and semantic distances; (2) decreased 'organization', reflected by decreased utility, convergent thinking and, marginally, elaboration; and (3) 'meaning', reflected by increased symbolic thinking and ambiguity in the data-driven results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSD changed creativity across modalities and measurement approaches. Three phenomena of pattern break, disorganization and meaning seemed to fundamentally influence creative cognition and behaviour pointing to a shift of cognitive resources 'away from normal' and 'towards the new'. LSD-induced symbolic thinking might provide a tool to support treatment efficiency in psychedelic-assisted therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":156490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"348-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811211069113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Controversy surrounds psychedelics and their potential to boost creativity. To date, psychedelic studies lack a uniform conceptualization of creativity and methodologically rigorous designs.

Aims: This study aimed at addressing previous issues by examining the effects of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) on creativity using multimodal tasks and multidimensional approaches.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 24 healthy volunteers received 50 μg of LSD or inactive placebo. Near drug peak, a creativity task battery was applied, including pattern meaning task (PMT), alternate uses task (AUT), picture concept task (PCT), creative metaphors task (MET) and figural creativity task (FIG). Creativity was assessed by scoring creativity criteria (novelty, utility, surprise), calculating divergent thinking (fluency, originality, flexibility, elaboration) and convergent thinking, computing semantic distances (semantic spread, semantic steps) and searching for data-driven special features.

Results: LSD, compared to placebo, changed several creativity measurements pointing to three overall LSD-induced phenomena: (1) 'pattern break', reflected by increased novelty, surprise, originality and semantic distances; (2) decreased 'organization', reflected by decreased utility, convergent thinking and, marginally, elaboration; and (3) 'meaning', reflected by increased symbolic thinking and ambiguity in the data-driven results.

Conclusion: LSD changed creativity across modalities and measurement approaches. Three phenomena of pattern break, disorganization and meaning seemed to fundamentally influence creative cognition and behaviour pointing to a shift of cognitive resources 'away from normal' and 'towards the new'. LSD-induced symbolic thinking might provide a tool to support treatment efficiency in psychedelic-assisted therapy.

迷幻药与创造力:增加新颖性和象征性思维,减少实用性和收敛性思维。
背景:围绕迷幻药及其促进创造力的潜力存在争议。迄今为止,迷幻药研究缺乏统一的创造性概念化和严谨的方法设计。目的:本研究旨在通过使用多模式任务和多维方法研究麦角酸二乙胺(LSD)对创造力的影响,解决以前的问题。方法:在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究中,24名健康志愿者接受50 μg LSD或无效安慰剂治疗。在药物峰值时,被试使用了一组创意任务,包括模式意义任务(PMT)、替代用途任务(AUT)、图片概念任务(PCT)、创意隐喻任务(MET)和图形创意任务(FIG)。创造力的评估方法包括:给创造力标准打分(新颖性、实用性、惊喜性),计算发散性思维(流畅性、独创性、灵活性、精细化)和收敛性思维,计算语义距离(语义传播、语义步骤),以及搜索数据驱动的特殊特征。结果:与安慰剂相比,LSD改变了几个创造力测量指标,指出了LSD引起的三种总体现象:(1)“模式打破”,表现为新颖性、惊喜性、原创性和语义距离的增加;(2)“组织性”下降,表现为实用性、收敛性思维和精细化程度的下降;和(3)“意义”,体现在数据驱动的结果中符号思维和模糊性的增加。结论:LSD改变了创造力的方式和测量方法。模式打破、混乱和意义这三种现象似乎从根本上影响了创造性的认知和行为,这表明认知资源从“正常”转向“新”。lsd诱导的符号思维可能为支持迷幻辅助治疗的治疗效率提供了一种工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信