Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA : Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA.

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Orthopade Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w
Lars-Rene Tuecking, Peter Savov, Henning Windhagen, Simon Jennings, Dinesh Nathwani, Max Ettinger
{"title":"Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA : Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA.","authors":"Lars-Rene Tuecking,&nbsp;Peter Savov,&nbsp;Henning Windhagen,&nbsp;Simon Jennings,&nbsp;Dinesh Nathwani,&nbsp;Max Ettinger","doi":"10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA (n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher's exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment (p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group (n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group (n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":54669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopade","volume":"50 12","pages":"1018-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642254/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopade","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and objective: It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty.

Methods: This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA (n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher's exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05.

Results: The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment (p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group (n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group (n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference.

Conclusion: Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

无图像机器人辅助翻修关节置换术从UKA到TKA:手术技术和病例对照研究与原发性机器人TKA的比较。
背景和目的:从国家关节登记中可以明显看出,膝关节置换术翻修手术的数量正在上升。本文的目的是介绍一种新的机器人辅助方法在UKA中进行TKA翻修关节置换术,并研究其对准精度,种植体组件的使用和手术时间,并将其与原发性机器人辅助TKA关节置换术进行比较。方法:本回顾性病例对照研究包括2018年11月至2020年7月期间接受无图像机器人辅助的UKA至TKA翻修关节置换术的患者(n = 20)和接受无图像机器人辅助的原发性TKA手术的患者(n = 20)。对照组根据BMI和自然对齐进行配对。各组比较基于术后对齐、异常率、胫骨插入物大小、侧骨切除深度、切口至伤口闭合时间。所有手术均由一名资深外科医生使用相同的双十字稳定TKA系统进行。统计分析采用参数t检验和Fisher精确检验,p的显著性水平为 。结果:两组患者的平均BMI、自然对齐(p > 0.05)和平均整体肢体对齐均无差异。在OLA和斜率分析中没有发现异常值。翻修组70%的病例(n = 14)和初级组90%的病例(n = 18,p = 0.24)采用最小插入物尺寸(9 mm),股骨远端和胫骨切除深度无统计学差异(p > 0.05)。翻修组切口至伤口闭合时间较翻修组长,但差异无统计学意义。结论:从UKA到TKA的无图像机器人辅助翻修关节置换术与原发性机器人辅助TKA相比,手术时间和对准精度相当。观察到两组的骨保存和随后的胫骨插入物大小使用具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopade
Orthopade 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Orthopäde is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of orthopaedics and its neighboring areas. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of orthopaedists. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange. Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信