Dissemination interventions to improve healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marcus Tolentino Silva, Tais Freire Galvao, Evelina Chapman, Everton Nunes da Silva, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
{"title":"Dissemination interventions to improve healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marcus Tolentino Silva, Tais Freire Galvao, Evelina Chapman, Everton Nunes da Silva, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto","doi":"10.1186/s13012-021-01164-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged health systems worldwide since 2020. At the frontline of the pandemic, healthcare workers are at high risk of exposure. Compliance with infection prevention and control (IPC) should be encouraged at the frontline. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of dissemination interventions to improve healthcare workers' adherence with IPC guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs that assessed the effect of any dissemination strategy in any healthcare settings. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. We synthesized data using random-effects model meta-analysis in Stata 14.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 14 RCTs conducted from 2004 to 2020 with over 65,370 healthcare workers. Adherence to IPC guidelines was assessed by influenza vaccination uptake, hand hygiene compliance, and knowledge on IPC. The most assessed intervention was educational material in combined strategies (plus educational meetings, local opinion leaders, audit and feedback, reminders, tailored interventions, monitoring the performance of the delivery of health care, educational games, and/or patient-mediated interventions). Combined dissemination strategies compared to usual routine improve vaccination uptake (risk ratio [RR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 1.81, moderate-certainty evidence), and may improve hand hygiene compliance (RR 1.70; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.83, moderate-certainty). When compared to single strategies, combined dissemination strategies probably had no effect on vaccination uptake (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.07, low-certainty), and hand hygiene compliance (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.36, low-certainty). Knowledge of healthcare workers on IPC improved when combined dissemination strategies were compared with usual activities, and the effect was uncertain in comparison to single strategy (very low-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined dissemination strategies increased workers' vaccination uptake, hand hygiene compliance, and knowledge on IPC in comparison to usual activities. The effect was negligible when compared to single dissemination strategies. The adoption of dissemination strategies in a planned and targeted way for healthcare workers may increase adherence to IPC guidelines and thus prevent dissemination of infectious disease in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Protocol available at http://osf.io/aqxnp .</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01164-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged health systems worldwide since 2020. At the frontline of the pandemic, healthcare workers are at high risk of exposure. Compliance with infection prevention and control (IPC) should be encouraged at the frontline. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of dissemination interventions to improve healthcare workers' adherence with IPC guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases in the workplace.

Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs that assessed the effect of any dissemination strategy in any healthcare settings. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. We synthesized data using random-effects model meta-analysis in Stata 14.2.

Results: We identified 14 RCTs conducted from 2004 to 2020 with over 65,370 healthcare workers. Adherence to IPC guidelines was assessed by influenza vaccination uptake, hand hygiene compliance, and knowledge on IPC. The most assessed intervention was educational material in combined strategies (plus educational meetings, local opinion leaders, audit and feedback, reminders, tailored interventions, monitoring the performance of the delivery of health care, educational games, and/or patient-mediated interventions). Combined dissemination strategies compared to usual routine improve vaccination uptake (risk ratio [RR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 1.81, moderate-certainty evidence), and may improve hand hygiene compliance (RR 1.70; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.83, moderate-certainty). When compared to single strategies, combined dissemination strategies probably had no effect on vaccination uptake (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.07, low-certainty), and hand hygiene compliance (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.36, low-certainty). Knowledge of healthcare workers on IPC improved when combined dissemination strategies were compared with usual activities, and the effect was uncertain in comparison to single strategy (very low-certainty evidence).

Conclusions: Combined dissemination strategies increased workers' vaccination uptake, hand hygiene compliance, and knowledge on IPC in comparison to usual activities. The effect was negligible when compared to single dissemination strategies. The adoption of dissemination strategies in a planned and targeted way for healthcare workers may increase adherence to IPC guidelines and thus prevent dissemination of infectious disease in the workplace.

Trial registration: Protocol available at http://osf.io/aqxnp .

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

传播干预措施提高医护人员对感染预防和控制指南的依从性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:自2020年以来,COVID-19大流行给全球卫生系统带来了挑战。在大流行的第一线,卫生保健工作者面临着很高的接触风险。应鼓励在一线遵守感染预防和控制(IPC)。本系统综述旨在评估传播干预措施的效果,以提高卫生保健工作者对工作场所呼吸道传染病IPC指南的依从性。方法:我们检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane COVID-19研究注册库。我们纳入了随机对照试验(rct)和聚类rct,以评估在任何医疗机构中任何传播策略的效果。使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。我们在Stata 14.2中使用随机效应模型荟萃分析来综合数据。结果:我们确定了2004年至2020年进行的14项随机对照试验,涉及65,370多名卫生保健工作者。通过流感疫苗接种、手部卫生依从性和IPC知识来评估对IPC指南的遵守情况。评估最多的干预措施是综合战略中的教育材料(加上教育会议、地方意见领袖、审计和反馈、提醒、量身定制的干预措施、监测提供保健服务的绩效、教育游戏和/或患者干预措施)。与常规方法相比,联合传播策略可提高疫苗接种率(风险比[RR] 1.59, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.54至1.81,中等确定性证据),并可提高手部卫生依从性(RR 1.70;95%可信区间1.03 - 2.83,中等确定性)。与单一策略相比,联合传播策略可能对疫苗接种率(RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95至1.07,低确定性)和手卫生依从性(RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99至1.36,低确定性)没有影响。与常规活动相比,联合传播策略提高了卫生保健工作者对IPC的了解,与单一策略相比,效果不确定(非常低确定性证据)。结论:与常规活动相比,联合传播策略提高了工人的疫苗接种率、手部卫生依从性和IPC知识。与单一传播策略相比,这种效果可以忽略不计。以有计划和有针对性的方式为卫生保健工作者采取传播战略,可以加强对感染预防和控制准则的遵守,从而防止传染病在工作场所传播。试验注册:方案可在http://osf.io/aqxnp上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信