{"title":"Participatory Action Research (PAR) - to better understand the experiences of nurse academics working in a team.","authors":"Louise Ward, Ruby Walter","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2021.1999835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is considerable literature outlining the high levels of occupational stress nurse academics experience, and the potential effect of workplace pressure on mental health and wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Objectives/aims/hypotheses: </strong>To support the notion that to succeed in an academic environment, academics are more successful when working in a team, two academics conducted a Participation Action Research study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The PAR study was developed in line with a <i>Clinical Skill Project</i> to better understand the experiences of nurse academics working in a team. The <i>Clinical Skills Project</i> involved the write up of 40 nursing skills for publication. Twenty-seven academics were recruited into the project and allocated skills to write, in teams of 2-3, according to clinical expertise and interest. The Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach formed the framework for the project, as well as, provided an opportunity for the nurse academics to 'come together' at fortnightly team meetings to discuss the project and talk about their experience working in a team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PAR cyclical process of observing, reflecting, planning, and acting there was ongoing opportunity for the academic nurses to discuss, question and share knowledge about academic practices. These Interactive reflections were recorded in a team reflective diary during the meetings. Participants were also asked to reflect on their individual experience of working in the team, before, during and after the project. At the completion of the project all reflective comments were transcribed to form a combined narrative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic and content analysis was then undertaken to identify any similarities and or differences in academic staff experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis revealed the following key themes. <i>Working in a team creates better staff relationships</i>, <i>Working in a team can change workplace culture</i> and <i>Working in a team can Improve staff health and well-being</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":"57 3-4","pages":"269-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1999835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: There is considerable literature outlining the high levels of occupational stress nurse academics experience, and the potential effect of workplace pressure on mental health and wellbeing.
Objectives/aims/hypotheses: To support the notion that to succeed in an academic environment, academics are more successful when working in a team, two academics conducted a Participation Action Research study.
Design: The PAR study was developed in line with a Clinical Skill Project to better understand the experiences of nurse academics working in a team. The Clinical Skills Project involved the write up of 40 nursing skills for publication. Twenty-seven academics were recruited into the project and allocated skills to write, in teams of 2-3, according to clinical expertise and interest. The Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach formed the framework for the project, as well as, provided an opportunity for the nurse academics to 'come together' at fortnightly team meetings to discuss the project and talk about their experience working in a team.
Methods: Using the PAR cyclical process of observing, reflecting, planning, and acting there was ongoing opportunity for the academic nurses to discuss, question and share knowledge about academic practices. These Interactive reflections were recorded in a team reflective diary during the meetings. Participants were also asked to reflect on their individual experience of working in the team, before, during and after the project. At the completion of the project all reflective comments were transcribed to form a combined narrative.
Results: Thematic and content analysis was then undertaken to identify any similarities and or differences in academic staff experience.
Conclusions: The analysis revealed the following key themes. Working in a team creates better staff relationships, Working in a team can change workplace culture and Working in a team can Improve staff health and well-being.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice.
Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives.
Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.