Prospective cohort study of nonspecific deprescribing in older medical inpatients being discharged to a nursing home.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2021-10-22 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986211052344
Patrick Russell, Udul Hewage, Cameron McDonald, Campbell Thompson, Richard Woodman, Arduino A Mangoni
{"title":"Prospective cohort study of nonspecific deprescribing in older medical inpatients being discharged to a nursing home.","authors":"Patrick Russell,&nbsp;Udul Hewage,&nbsp;Cameron McDonald,&nbsp;Campbell Thompson,&nbsp;Richard Woodman,&nbsp;Arduino A Mangoni","doi":"10.1177/20420986211052344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older patients from nursing homes are commonly exposed to polypharmacy before a hospital admission. Deprescribing has been promoted as a solution to this problem, though systematic reviews have not found benefit. The aim of this study was to understand if in-hospital deprescribing of certain classes of medications is associated with certain benefits or risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, multicentre, cohort study in 239 medical inpatients ⩾75 years (mean age 87.4 years) who were exposed to polypharmacy (⩾5 medications) prior to admission and discharged to a nursing home for permanent placement. Patients were categorised by whether deprescribing occurred, mortality and readmissions were assessed 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge. The EQ-5D-5 L health survey assessed changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 90 days, with comparison to EQ-5D-5 L results at day 30. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to investigate associations between patterns of prescribed and deprescribed medications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients for whom deprescribing occurred had a higher Charlson Index; there were no differences between the groups in principal diagnosis, total or Beers list number of medications on admission. The number of Beers list medications increased in both groups before discharge. Patients who had medications deprescribed had nonsignificantly greater odds of dying within 90 days [odds ration (OR) = 3.23 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68, 14.92; p = 0.136]. Deprescribing of certain classes was associated with higher 90-day mortality: antihypertensives (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.004, 5; <i>p</i> = 0.049) and statins (OR = 5, 95% CI: 1.61, 14.28; <i>p</i> = 0.005). Readmissions and 1-year mortality rates were similar. There was no deterioration in HRQOL when medications were deprescribed. LCA showed that patients with the least medication changes had the lowest mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deprescribing certain classes of medications during hospitalisation was associated with worse mortality, but not readmissions or overall HRQOL. Larger controlled deprescribing studies targeting specific medications are warranted to further investigate these findings.This study was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN1 2616001336471.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><b>Background:</b> When an older person living in a nursing home is admitted to hospital, does stopping long-term medications help them?Many older people from nursing homes take a large number of medications each day to treat symptoms and prevent adverse events. \"Polypharmacy\" is a term used to describe taking multiple long-term medications, and it is associated with many negative outcomes such as increased number of falls, cognitive decline, hospital readmission, even death. Deprescribing of nonessential medications - whether stopping or reducing the dose - is promoted as good hospital practice and is assumed to help older frail people live longer and feel better. However, we often don't fully understand what is and is not essential.We wanted to better understand the effect of deprescribing long-term medications for older frail patients during an unplanned hospital admission as they were going to a nursing home to live.<b>Methods:</b> While admitted to hospital, medications are often reviewed by a clinical pharmacist and specialist physician. Sometimes medications are ceased; sometimes they are not. This gave us the opportunity to study two groups of older frail people from nursing homes: those who had regular, long-term medications ceased or reduced and those who did not. We wanted to see if one group did better. For example, did they feel worse if we stopped certain medications? Did they suffer other bad events compared with those patients for whom no medications were ceased? Were they readmitted to hospital earlier or more often?<b>Results and conclusion:</b> Despite the assumption that stopping medications for this type of patient is good practice, we found no benefit. We were also surprised to find stopping or reducing certain drug classes (e.g. antihypertensives and cholesterol-lowering drugs) was associated with greater mortality. Larger, randomised studies will better answer these important questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/eb/10.1177_20420986211052344.PMC8543714.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986211052344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Older patients from nursing homes are commonly exposed to polypharmacy before a hospital admission. Deprescribing has been promoted as a solution to this problem, though systematic reviews have not found benefit. The aim of this study was to understand if in-hospital deprescribing of certain classes of medications is associated with certain benefits or risks.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicentre, cohort study in 239 medical inpatients ⩾75 years (mean age 87.4 years) who were exposed to polypharmacy (⩾5 medications) prior to admission and discharged to a nursing home for permanent placement. Patients were categorised by whether deprescribing occurred, mortality and readmissions were assessed 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge. The EQ-5D-5 L health survey assessed changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 90 days, with comparison to EQ-5D-5 L results at day 30. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to investigate associations between patterns of prescribed and deprescribed medications and mortality.

Results: Patients for whom deprescribing occurred had a higher Charlson Index; there were no differences between the groups in principal diagnosis, total or Beers list number of medications on admission. The number of Beers list medications increased in both groups before discharge. Patients who had medications deprescribed had nonsignificantly greater odds of dying within 90 days [odds ration (OR) = 3.23 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68, 14.92; p = 0.136]. Deprescribing of certain classes was associated with higher 90-day mortality: antihypertensives (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.004, 5; p = 0.049) and statins (OR = 5, 95% CI: 1.61, 14.28; p = 0.005). Readmissions and 1-year mortality rates were similar. There was no deterioration in HRQOL when medications were deprescribed. LCA showed that patients with the least medication changes had the lowest mortality.

Conclusion: Deprescribing certain classes of medications during hospitalisation was associated with worse mortality, but not readmissions or overall HRQOL. Larger controlled deprescribing studies targeting specific medications are warranted to further investigate these findings.This study was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN1 2616001336471.

Plain language summary: Background: When an older person living in a nursing home is admitted to hospital, does stopping long-term medications help them?Many older people from nursing homes take a large number of medications each day to treat symptoms and prevent adverse events. "Polypharmacy" is a term used to describe taking multiple long-term medications, and it is associated with many negative outcomes such as increased number of falls, cognitive decline, hospital readmission, even death. Deprescribing of nonessential medications - whether stopping or reducing the dose - is promoted as good hospital practice and is assumed to help older frail people live longer and feel better. However, we often don't fully understand what is and is not essential.We wanted to better understand the effect of deprescribing long-term medications for older frail patients during an unplanned hospital admission as they were going to a nursing home to live.Methods: While admitted to hospital, medications are often reviewed by a clinical pharmacist and specialist physician. Sometimes medications are ceased; sometimes they are not. This gave us the opportunity to study two groups of older frail people from nursing homes: those who had regular, long-term medications ceased or reduced and those who did not. We wanted to see if one group did better. For example, did they feel worse if we stopped certain medications? Did they suffer other bad events compared with those patients for whom no medications were ceased? Were they readmitted to hospital earlier or more often?Results and conclusion: Despite the assumption that stopping medications for this type of patient is good practice, we found no benefit. We were also surprised to find stopping or reducing certain drug classes (e.g. antihypertensives and cholesterol-lowering drugs) was associated with greater mortality. Larger, randomised studies will better answer these important questions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非特异性处方在老年住院病人出院到养老院的前瞻性队列研究。
背景:来自养老院的老年患者通常在入院前接触多种药物。尽管系统评价没有发现有什么好处,但处方解除已被推广为解决这一问题的一种方法。这项研究的目的是了解在医院内开处方的某些种类的药物是否与某些益处或风险有关。方法:我们在239名小于75岁(平均年龄87.4岁)的医疗住院患者中进行了一项前瞻性,多中心,队列研究,这些患者在入院之前暴露于多种药物(大于等于5种药物)并出院到养老院进行永久安置。根据是否发生处方解除、出院后30天和90天评估死亡率和再入院情况对患者进行分类。eq - 5d - 5l健康调查评估了90天健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的变化,并与eq - 5d - 5l在第30天的结果进行了比较。使用潜类分析(LCA)来调查处方药和非处方药模式与死亡率之间的关系。结果:出现处方解除的患者Charlson指数较高;两组在主要诊断、总用药或入院时比尔斯清单用药数量方面无差异。两组患者在出院前服用的比尔斯清单药物数量均有所增加。服用处方药物的患者在90天内死亡的几率没有显著增加[比值比(OR) = 3.23(95%可信区间(CI): 0.68, 14.92;P = 0.136]。某些类别的处方减少与较高的90天死亡率相关:抗高血压药(OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.004, 5;p = 0.049)和他汀类药物(或= 5,95%置信区间CI: 1.61, 14.28;p = 0.005)。再入院率和1年死亡率相似。在开药后,患者的HRQOL没有恶化。LCA显示,药物变化最少的患者死亡率最低。结论:住院期间减少某些类别的药物处方与较差的死亡率相关,但与再入院或总体HRQOL无关。针对特定药物的更大规模的对照开处方研究有必要进一步调查这些发现。本研究已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册,编号为ACTRN1 2616001336471。背景:当一个住在养老院的老人入院时,停止长期药物治疗对他们有帮助吗?许多来自养老院的老年人每天服用大量药物来治疗症状和预防不良事件。“多重用药”是一个用来描述长期服用多种药物的术语,它与许多负面结果有关,如跌倒次数增加、认知能力下降、再次住院,甚至死亡。减少非必要药物的处方——无论是停药还是减少剂量——被宣传为良好的医院做法,并被认为可以帮助年老体弱的人活得更长,感觉更好。然而,我们常常不能完全理解什么是必要的,什么不是必要的。我们想要更好地了解,在老年人去养老院生活时,在计划外住院期间,对他们开长期药物处方的效果。方法:在入院时,药物通常由临床药剂师和专科医生审查。有时停止用药;有时却并非如此。这让我们有机会研究两组来自养老院的年老体弱的人:一组定期停止或减少长期药物治疗,另一组没有。我们想看看是否有一组做得更好。例如,如果我们停止某些药物,他们会感觉更糟吗?与那些没有停药的患者相比,他们是否遭受了其他不良事件?他们是否更早或更频繁地再次入院?结果和结论:尽管假设对这类患者停止药物治疗是一种良好的做法,但我们发现没有任何益处。我们还惊讶地发现停止或减少某些药物类别(例如抗高血压和降胆固醇药物)与更高的死亡率相关。更大规模的随机研究将更好地回答这些重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信