Controversy When Choosing the Anatomical Plane for Post Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

European journal of breast health Pub Date : 2021-10-04 eCollection Date: 2021-10-01 DOI:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-8-1
Andrea Ramírez, Natalia A Cátala-Rivera, Duneska D Obando, Charoo Piplani, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, John P Garcia
{"title":"Controversy When Choosing the Anatomical Plane for Post Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Andrea Ramírez, Natalia A Cátala-Rivera, Duneska D Obando, Charoo Piplani, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, John P Garcia","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-8-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caputo et al. (2) carried out a retrospective study with 94 patients submitted randomly to mastectomies with different surgical approaches with subsequent reconstruction with insertion of breast implants in the various planes. Complications and postoperative symptoms were evaluated, as well as the impact on quality of life. It was observed that the pre-pectoral approach had a beneficial effect on the patient's quality of life, sexual well-being, and aesthetic satisfaction (2). In conclusion, the use of the subpectoral plane for implant positioning in postmastectomy reconstruction is still widely accepted. The prepectoral plane has brought new challenges as well as more questions about the best technique. Studies have shown that the pre-pectoral technique decreases the rate of less desired outcomes. There is an aesthetic improvement, a good impact on quality of life, and the rate of postoperative comorbidities decreases.","PeriodicalId":11885,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8496112/pdf/ejbh-17-386.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-8-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caputo et al. (2) carried out a retrospective study with 94 patients submitted randomly to mastectomies with different surgical approaches with subsequent reconstruction with insertion of breast implants in the various planes. Complications and postoperative symptoms were evaluated, as well as the impact on quality of life. It was observed that the pre-pectoral approach had a beneficial effect on the patient's quality of life, sexual well-being, and aesthetic satisfaction (2). In conclusion, the use of the subpectoral plane for implant positioning in postmastectomy reconstruction is still widely accepted. The prepectoral plane has brought new challenges as well as more questions about the best technique. Studies have shown that the pre-pectoral technique decreases the rate of less desired outcomes. There is an aesthetic improvement, a good impact on quality of life, and the rate of postoperative comorbidities decreases.
乳房切除术后乳房重建解剖平面选择的争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信