Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Antoine Laramée, Guillaume Léonard, Mélanie Morin, Mélanie Roch, Nathaly Gaudreault
{"title":"Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study.","authors":"Antoine Laramée, Guillaume Léonard, Mélanie Morin, Mélanie Roch, Nathaly Gaudreault","doi":"10.1186/s40945-021-00118-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dry needling (DN) is increasingly used for treating myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and has shown significant effects on pain and function. This study aimed to assess feasibility of conducting a randomized sham-controlled trial and to collect preliminary data on the effects of infraspinatus DN on corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomized feasibility study included adults with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain and a infraspinatus MTrP. Participants were randomized to receive real DN or sham DN in the infraspinatus MTrP. Feasibility outcomes included data pertaining to recruitment, retention of participants, completeness and safety of assessment procedures. Neurophysiological and psychophysical outcomes included corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity measured by active motor threshold (aMT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT), respectively. They were assessed at baseline, immediately after and 24 h post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one participants were recruited over a 6-month period. Nineteen participants completed the treatment and follow-up assessment. Motor evoked potential responses were discernible in all but 1 participant. Only 1 minor adverse event related to transcranial magnetic stimulation (mild headache) affected the measurements. No DN adverse effects were recorded in both groups. An overall completeness rate of 81% was reached, with 70% completeness in the DN group and 91% in the sham group. Data analysis revealed that real DN increased corticospinal excitability (reduced aMT) 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = - 5.96% MSO, IQR = 5.17, p = 0.04) and that sham DN triggered similar responses immediately after the intervention (Mdn = - 1.93% MSO, IQR = 1.11, p = 0.03). Increased mechanical pain sensitivity (reduced PPT) was significant only in the sham group, both immediately (Mdn = - 0.44 kg/cm<sup>2</sup>, IQR = 0.49, p = 0.01) and 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = - 0.52 kg/cm<sup>2</sup>, IQR = 1.02, p = 0.02). Changes in corticospinal excitability was positively correlated with changes in mechanical pain sensitivity in the DN group, both immediately (r = 0.77, p = 0.02) and 24 h post-intervention (r = 0.75, p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study demonstrates the feasibility of quantifying the neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of DN, and provides recommendations and guidelines for future studies. Moreover, it provides preliminary evidence that DN may increase corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain and that the relationship of neurophysiological and psychophysical effects is promising to better understand its mechanisms of action.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04316793 ; retrospectively registered November 3, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-021-00118-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dry needling (DN) is increasingly used for treating myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and has shown significant effects on pain and function. This study aimed to assess feasibility of conducting a randomized sham-controlled trial and to collect preliminary data on the effects of infraspinatus DN on corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity.

Method: This randomized feasibility study included adults with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain and a infraspinatus MTrP. Participants were randomized to receive real DN or sham DN in the infraspinatus MTrP. Feasibility outcomes included data pertaining to recruitment, retention of participants, completeness and safety of assessment procedures. Neurophysiological and psychophysical outcomes included corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity measured by active motor threshold (aMT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT), respectively. They were assessed at baseline, immediately after and 24 h post-intervention.

Results: Twenty-one participants were recruited over a 6-month period. Nineteen participants completed the treatment and follow-up assessment. Motor evoked potential responses were discernible in all but 1 participant. Only 1 minor adverse event related to transcranial magnetic stimulation (mild headache) affected the measurements. No DN adverse effects were recorded in both groups. An overall completeness rate of 81% was reached, with 70% completeness in the DN group and 91% in the sham group. Data analysis revealed that real DN increased corticospinal excitability (reduced aMT) 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = - 5.96% MSO, IQR = 5.17, p = 0.04) and that sham DN triggered similar responses immediately after the intervention (Mdn = - 1.93% MSO, IQR = 1.11, p = 0.03). Increased mechanical pain sensitivity (reduced PPT) was significant only in the sham group, both immediately (Mdn = - 0.44 kg/cm2, IQR = 0.49, p = 0.01) and 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = - 0.52 kg/cm2, IQR = 1.02, p = 0.02). Changes in corticospinal excitability was positively correlated with changes in mechanical pain sensitivity in the DN group, both immediately (r = 0.77, p = 0.02) and 24 h post-intervention (r = 0.75, p = 0.05).

Conclusion: The present study demonstrates the feasibility of quantifying the neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of DN, and provides recommendations and guidelines for future studies. Moreover, it provides preliminary evidence that DN may increase corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain and that the relationship of neurophysiological and psychophysical effects is promising to better understand its mechanisms of action.

Trial registration: NCT04316793 ; retrospectively registered November 3, 2020.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

干针与假针对慢性肩痛患者冈下肌的神经生理学和心理物理学影响:随机可行性研究。
背景:干针疗法(DN)越来越多地用于治疗肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs),并已显示出对疼痛和功能的显著效果。本研究旨在评估进行随机假对照试验的可行性,并收集冈下干针疗法对皮质脊髓兴奋性和机械痛敏感性影响的初步数据:这项随机可行性研究的参与者包括患有慢性非创伤性肩痛和冈下MTrP的成年人。参与者被随机分配到冈下MTrP接受真DN或假DN治疗。可行性结果包括与招募、保留参与者、评估程序的完整性和安全性有关的数据。神经生理学和心理物理学结果包括皮质脊髓兴奋性和机械痛敏感性,分别通过主动运动阈值(aMT)和压力痛阈值(PPT)测量。这些结果分别在基线、干预后立即和干预后 24 小时进行评估:招募了 21 名参与者,为期 6 个月。结果:在 6 个月的时间里,共招募了 21 名参与者,其中 19 人完成了治疗和后续评估。除 1 名参与者外,其他参与者均出现了运动诱发电位反应。只有一个与经颅磁刺激有关的轻微不良反应(轻微头痛)影响了测量结果。两组患者均未出现 DN 不良反应。总体完整率达到 81%,其中 DN 组为 70%,假体组为 91%。数据分析显示,真正的 DN 增加了干预后 24 小时的皮质脊髓兴奋性(降低了 aMT)(Mdn = - 5.96% MSO,IQR = 5.17,p = 0.04),而假 DN 在干预后立即引发了类似的反应(Mdn = - 1.93% MSO,IQR = 1.11,p = 0.03)。机械痛敏感性的增加(PPT 降低)仅在假干预组中有显著表现,包括干预后即刻(Mdn = - 0.44 kg/cm2,IQR = 0.49,p = 0.01)和干预后 24 小时(Mdn = - 0.52 kg/cm2,IQR = 1.02,p = 0.02)。在 DN 组中,皮质脊髓兴奋性的变化与机械痛敏感性的变化呈正相关,干预后即刻(r = 0.77,p = 0.02)和干预后 24 小时(r = 0.75,p = 0.05)均是如此:本研究证明了量化 DN 神经生理学和心理物理学效应的可行性,并为今后的研究提供了建议和指导。此外,该研究还提供了初步证据,证明 DN 可提高慢性肩痛患者冈下肌的皮质脊髓兴奋性,而且神经生理学效应和心理物理学效应之间的关系有望更好地了解其作用机制:NCT04316793 ; 2020年11月3日回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信